Peruta V. San Diego County Case Study

Dick Anthony Heller was a D.C. special police officer who was authorized to carry a handgun while on duty. He applied for a one-year license for a handgun he wished to keep at home, but his application was denied. Once Heller received his denial, he took to the District of Columbia stating that they violated his Second Amendment right to keep a functional firearm in his home without a license. The district court dismissed the complaint. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed and held that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep firearms in the home for the purpose of self-defense, and the District of Columbia’s requirement that firearms kept in the home be nonfunctional violated that right.

Heller.", Oyez). Furthermore, in dealing with the text of the Constitution as well as the history, the court held that “militia” will not be limited to citizens currently in the armed forces but, “…comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense” (Syllabus). The majority felt that due to the period in which the Constitution was penned, to define the Second Amendment as restrictive, and allotting the right to possess firearms to those only serving in the United States military, would be to juxtapose what was expected of the Amendment and enact a state-sponsored power that the Constitution was trying to safeguard the people from ("District of Columbia v. Heller. ", Oyez). Therefore, in correlation to the original and plain meaning of the Second Amendment, the operative clause as Scalia stated, should be interpreted to “…protect an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” (Syllabus).

Gun Control "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." As Thomas Jefferson stated, this right of citizens is a way of self defense. This has been a right of the people in America for centuries, why should this right be taken away now? Enforcing of this law could increase attacks, restrict good citizens, and take away a means of defense from the people.

However, Heller overturns this decision by the means of Scalia’s interpretation of the Second Amendment provided above. Since the Second Amendment’s prefatory clause does not limit its operative clause, the Amendment can be interpreted as an individual right available to all citizens of the United States, not just those who serve in a

Ted Nugent has a few good points on the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms. He states how he believes that it is such an obvious right that it shouldn’t have to be permitted. Ted Nugent believes that citizens of the United States shouldn’t have to be told when, how, and where they should defend themselves. In the United States, there has been a controversy on the right to bear arms due to the multiple mass shootings throughout the nation. Nugent makes a point on how many people could still be alive by defending themselves with a weapon at hand.

The Second Amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." –James Madison, The Second Amendment. The founders of our country as well as our constitution believed that without weapons in the form of firearms, there is no freedom from the harsh rulings of a corrupt government. These founders had just been freed from the duty of war from a corrupt and harsh government, without their weapons or the weapons of the people; this country would not be where it is today.

In other words, the law does not need to be repealed; it needs to be well defined. In any case, Cohen emphasizes when dealing with the law “education is the key; a lynch mob mentality will not solve misconceptions about the law” (Cohen). If you are going to take a position when it comes to law, make sure you are informed. Make your decision on facts. Most laws work when they are applied correctly.

And there are so many reasons why. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This is the second amendment of the United States Constitution which was written in 1791 and has been debated ever since. Conceal and carry is the practice of carrying a weapon in

The second amendment states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”, which means that any u.s citizen who qualifies the standards can store a weapon at his/her house. “The second amendment was adopted in December 15, 1791” which was adopted to guarantee us citizens safety; yet, we can 't feel

Gun Control is a serious issue in America there are over a dozen mass shootings happening every year not counting gang violence. Gun control is a very sensitive topic because there are two sides to every story why is gun control bad and why is it good. Gun control has been a very big issue in the U.S since we have been dealing with a lot of terrorist attacks. The U.S have a had laws to make it harder for people to get guns by doing more background checks and other history about your mental health. Gun control is an issue because shootings are too common now there has to more strict rules on guns.

Wouldn 't you agree that this is Blasphemy? We have a country cannot go one month without having a major televised mass shooting and rebuke. I know many are are saying that guns help us keep our freedom, guns help us keep a non-corrupt government. Many of you are right and I agree with you that guns do help us in ways but what I am saying is that we should have tighter restrictions on accessing guns.

Although the specifics vary by state, a common implementation as seen in the state of Alabama is that "as long as someone is somewhere lawfully and is not engaged in illegal activity, the person has no duty to retreat from an attack and has the right to stand his or her ground” (Fair). In states that do not have stand your ground laws, a victim is expected to make every possible attempt to flee from their attacker before resorting to fighting back (Roberts). This creates a potentially dangerous situation, where a victim of violent crime sacrifices their upper hand in a confrontation out of an attempt to adhere with the law. This also empowers the attackers, as they know that their victims cannot legally fight back with lethal force. Stand your ground laws create a situation where criminals are immediately stopped in the act.

This country is made up with a population that believes that pacifism is the way to go when they are too quick

In the United States, the Second Amendment protects the right to “bear arms”. The Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution. Amendment Ⅱ). This means that a strong military is a necessity for a safe country and household, so dictating the people’s right to own firearms is considered unconstitutional . Self defense and hunting are the most common reasons for owning a weapon in the U.S. Although this Amendment declares restricting firearms unconstitutional, it is nationally debated whether the use of weaponry is a collective or personal matter.

Please see attached examples of signs. The signs must be at every entrance, per the Harris County Attorney’s office. If a person bring a gun on property then he could be charge with a class “C” misdemeanor. However, the owner can verbal tell someone that he not allowed to bring a gun on his property. He must give the gun owner and opportunity to get off the property with the gun.