Pesticide Suicide
After reading Silent Spring by Rachel Carson my perception on the use of pesticides has changed. I was aware of the possible effects that could occur if pesticides were applied incorrectly, such as contaminating the water supply. However, I didn’t realize the severity of such effects and their coupling consequences caused by unregulated sprayings only fifty-six years ago. As Carson illustrated, the pesticidal contaminants, including DDT, PCBs, Dieldrin, Heptachlor, phenols, and countless others, not only affected targeted pests, but also unintentionally affected surrounding organismal populations. These included salmon in the streams, robins in the trees, cattle in the pasture, and eagles in their nests, to list a few.
Fire ant removal in the Southern states caused public uproar. The insect wasn't bothersome to most, yet the government continued their mission to eradicate it. Dieldrin and heptachlor, chemicals far more toxic than DDT, were applied to lands. These chemicals caused a nervous system disease, and in a few weeks, numerous animals domestic and wild died off (Carson 168). Southerners then questioned food quality, worrying drinking milk and eating meat of the contaminated animals would harm them as well (169). Not to mention, once the program came to an end, it was believed there were more fire ants than when they
…show more content…
I live surrounded by dairy farms and farmland, and if concerns arise regarding their operations I will report it to the appropriate authorities. As for individually spraying for weeds and insects on lawns or in trees, I will try and avoid it, but if it’s unavoidable I will take necessary precautions. This includes simple measures, such as only spot spraying where it’s needed, moving pets out of harm's way, and wearing appropriate attire to prevent skin contact and
Carson appeals to the arousal of the basic emotions, such as the arousal of fear in the public. Carson also appeals to pathos, or the emotions, by questioning the “highly intelligent” creators of these pesticides. Carson believes irrational bad decisions based on faulty evidence threaten the future existence of mankind. “Along with the possibility of the extinction of mankind by nuclear war, the central problem of our age has therefore become the contamination of man’s total environment with such substances of incredible potential for harm-substances that accumulate in the tissues of plants and animals and even penetrate the germ cells to shatter or alter the very material of heredity upon which the shape of the future depends.” However, the statement supports Carson’s intention to present a persuasive, and logical point of view without confusing the reader; suggesting she ment to go against a patient audience rather than an impatient one.
2.21 PESTICIDES Manahan (19..) discusses pesticides as water pollutants. DDT was introduced after World War II which accelerated pesticide use. Manahan (19..) states that by the mid-1990s agricultural use of pesticides was over 300 million kg per year and millions more kg of pesticides were used in non-agricultural applications. Manahan: Insecticides such as diazinon, carbaryl and chlorpyifos are most commonly found in water.
There is always opposition to pesticides because of the harm that it can cause on the environment and the animals alike. Pesticides though have saved a lot of hard work for farmers over the past couple of decades because it does all the dirty work, for example, the killing of weeds and other pests. Pesticides have also saved a lot of money for farmers by preventing pests from damaging crops or taking the nutrients and water supply away from crops. (Whitford, 7) In the future we need to start to find less toxic ways to prevent pests from attacking the crops and vegetation. This would prevent a lot of the other costs associated with pesticides for example, health costs for farmers that are exposed to the toxic chemicals or the killing of the habitats in the surrounding areas.
The most affected creature are the bees that are coming into contact with the insecticide. The aerial spraying in North Carolina resulted in the death of millions of honeybees. The product used, Trump, which contains the pesticide Naled, is labeled to be highly toxic to bees. Many beekeepers were not warned about the aerial spraying which resulted in the loss of their colonies. Juanita Stanley stated: “Now, I 'm going to have to destroy my hives, the honey, all
Companies have known that their pesticides and fungicides could cause cancer and birth defects, but have still used them. These companies acted to gain money without any thought given to the people who they were harming. When some of these companies were accused of not stopping the use of the harmful agents, many settled, but not many admitted or felt any guilt for the actions that they took. Corporations have no feelings other than their drive to gain profits, and many companies harm people for their own personal
Rachel Carson, an environmentalist wrote about the negative effects of pesticides and DDT in her book, “Silent Spring”. The book became very popular during the war and showcased how DDT was decimating the wildlife population, especially birds. Illustrated through the book, DDT was causing birds’ eggshells to thin which almost led to species such as robin bird and American Bald Eagle almost becoming extinct. Also, the chemical CFC, which was used in refrigerants, hair sprays, etc. was being overused which led to a hole in the ozone layer that protects Earth from harmful radiation caused by the Sun. Another environmental problem occurring during this time was the disregard for what could be dumped into our waterways.
In 1962, Rachel Carson published Silent Springs, where she noted that pesticides have a connection to human health issues, and found that farm laborers had higher rates of health risk. Due to her strong activism, she had the power to put some restrictions on the amount of DDT being used. Carson cautioned all of society to reconsider the conditions of farm laborers, most of which are undocumented today. In fact, over 75% of California farmworkers are undocumented; 83% in Santa Cruz county (Speaker Dr. Ann Lopez.) After being exposed to pesticide poisoning, they face headaches, nausea, and seizures. Much of these cases head on to cancer, infertility problems, neurological disorders, and respiratory conditions.
In the first chapter of “Living Downstream” by Sandra Steingraber discussed about personal experiences living in Illinois and discovering how much the landscape has changed over the years. In addition to the changing landscape, cancer, especially breast cancer, has increased in the prairies of Illinois and pesticides usage may cause. Much of the discussion first begin with the change of landscape as the prairies of Illinois has become a place for farming and pesticides. As farming became an important aspect of Illinois, pesticides were created to remove any bugs or insects from the product that is being farmed. A few pesticides formulas that came to be are atrazine, dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane (DDT), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
Eradicating one species of insects, for example, can have serious unintended effects. These pesticides can kill of pollinating insects as well, which in turn reduces crop outputs. All living things in the natural world depend on one another, just as people depend on one another in human environments. It is the responsibility of all people to protect this delicate
Her diction is undoubtedly her main “weapon” that she utilizes to address the issue of pesticides. With words such as “direct target,” “poisons,” “killing,” “death,” and “lethal” in her arsenal of care and peace, she roots an alarming sense into her audience by showing pesticide as a relentless beast that causes nothing but harm. In a way, Carson amplifies the word pesticide into much more sinister concept: death. She personifies it with her dire word choice, considering it a “universal killer” (28) and a “wave of death” (50) that was perpetuated by farmers and the authoritarian. She compares the farmers who use pesticide to “judge and jury” who have “doomed” innocent creatures that they are either ignorant of or for whom they care little for (31-32).
Using these literary devices, Carson uncovers a usually unseen perspective surrounding pesticides and other chemical controllers we use, and how they oppress nature’s innate systems and operations. Rachel Carson uses scientific diction to a great extent in Silent Spring, with intent to reveal her intellectual studies and earnest efforts to expand her message about man’s attempts to control nature. Carson uses an effort to include technical terminology in her book, and we see this throughout the passage. For example, Carson displays her extensive knowledge of biology when she says “by their very nature chemical controls are self-defeating, for they have been devised and applied without taking into account the complex biological systems against which they have been blindly hurled” (ll. 22-24). It is assumed then, that Carson has done research to come to this conclusion.
This is what Rachel Carson was trying to tell the world in her essay “Pesticides”. Rachel Carson is a well-known marine biologist and environmental author. She is very knowledgeable about the environmental effects that humans have on nature. In her essay, “Pesticides”, she talks about how pesticides harm the environment, and in turn, harm us. She also says how man has made a war against nature, and it will end with the demise of both sides.
Pesticides and How it Works Abstract: A pest is "a plant or creature unfavorable to people or human concerns". Pesticide is Chemical or natural substance intended to slaughter or retard the development of pests that harm or meddle with the development of products, bushes, trees, timber and other vegetation coveted by people. Keywords: Antimicrobials, Antimicrobials, Herbicides Introduction:
Imagine having so much pesticides in use that people and animals were actually dying from it. In the 1950’s the overuse of pesticides was a serious problem. Rachel Carson was an activist who was against the use and overuse for these pesticides. She wanted to address this problem to the government and the public and warn about the harmful effects pesticides have on the environment and the people. In “A Fable For Tomorrow”, Rachel Carson utilizes ethos, logos and pathos in order to bring awareness to the overuse of pesticides.
In today’s world, there are many people creating new chemical substances that has negative effect to our world. Rachel Carson, in her article "The Obligation to Endure" argues that the pesticides and other chemicals we use are harmful to more than just the environment. I agree with Carson in her article, in that we should reduce most of the harmful chemical use and instead use technological inventions. Carson is a person who seems very passionate about the environment and is very concerned of its inhabitants. It is hard to believe that intelligent human beings would use bad chemicals substances that would affect the environment and themselves negatively.