Peta Is Ineffective Rhetoric

142 Words1 Page
The PETA ad is ineffective rhetoric ad because it has no logic, emotion, or ethics. For example, in the ad it states " feeding kids meat is child abuse". Logic is obviouse, and this is not obviouse because kids need meat for proper nutrition. It is not child abuse to feed kids meat, if so, millions of parents would be in jail right now. One can acknowledge that the author added a picture to show a kid, but the kid looks obiest that is eating a cheese burger. If the creator would of state" feeding obiest kids fast food (junkfood) it would be a way more effective and powerful ad because it is reasonable to feed more fat to overweight kids. For all of these reason one could assume that this is not an efrective rhetoric ad, therefore this ad is
Open Document