However it is a win-lose situation due to the conflict being unresolved as I had to put down my dignity and let him call me names and talk bad about me throughout the clinical attachment. Be that as it may it got the best of me as I was more reluctant to go for clinical attachment. Hence this approach was not the best solution for this situation. (Marquis & Huston) Going with a different approach realising that my previous strategy made no significant improvements in managing the situation, I went with avoiding as it was a small misunderstanding and I did not want to confront him as it may turn it into rivalry between us peers. Furthermore, we may become future colleagues.
Recommendation: Alternative 1: The best solution for Garland Chocolates is to invest in the new equipment. Their old equipment is 20 years old which is when the machinery can be replaced. It has been able to serve them for so long but the maintenance of the old equipment will get very pricey very fast. Justification for recommendation Once you replace the equipment you can get that money back in revenue. If the equipment is replaced then output can increase because of the increased efficiency.
Lying to someone in a wrong way or for your own good is not right because you would not be the person’s true best friend and plus you are not doing your own work. When you lie to someone and after some while that person finds it out, the trust between each other would not be there. I agree in some cases you have to lie for someone else which is totally fine because that is not good for you but good for someone else. I think lying and using someone else is wrong because you should be doing your own work and also the trust between each other won’t be
Ironically he does so by doing nothing. Nick Carraway’s passive nature leads to the many mishaps in the novel, which stresses the idea that not being evil does not necessarily make someone a good person. Had Carraway been less apathetic, the death of Gatsby and of Myrtle could have been prevented. The issues in the novel are rooted in Carraway’s passive tendencies towards the actions of the people around him. “I’m inclined to reserve all judgements” (1) Nick states at the beginning of the novel, which instantly sets up his passivity.
He has succumbed to the idea that he is not a real, complete man anymore; others can probably sense this about him, and they stay away because they do not want to be dragged down by his self-pity. The idea that only “some” cheered him home suggests that no one wanted to see the negative aspects of the war; which the speaker
The question being asked is if Nick Carraway an honest narrator. This question is being asked due to mixed emotions of this particular narrator. At times it feels like Nick is holding back his honest opinion because he doesn 't want to hurt anyone or just because Nick doesn 't want to say the harsh truth. This affects the story at times such as Nick knowing about Tom 's mistress and never telling Daisy about her. Which in the end resulted in a very unfitting demise for Gatsby and Myrtle.
Being in love with someone does not consist of wanting them to be in “some great danger”. After saying this Nora believes that Torvald will do just that but he reacts to the letter by telling her “don 't make silly excuses. Miserable creature--what have you done?” (62). Torvald does the exact opposite of what he said he would do if Nora was in any danger. They way Torvald speaks to Nora after her read the letter was revolting.
To others, taking away Shylock’s religion and livelihood is not considered being merciful because they are punishing Shylock for trying to get what was rightfully his. This shows that the value of mercy is subjective, and differs from person to person. Furthermore, there is the important question of when and how much mercy should be shown. In this scene, Shylock is asked to give mercy when he has to reason to. However, the duke claims that he is merciful to Shylock, even though he is not obliged to.
Perhaps that difference is actually a lack of underlying trust in your relationship. For example, instead of looking past your disagreements like George and Lennie, you hold on to them and carry them around with you like a chip on your shoulder. In hindsight these pointless arguments can greatly affect your relationship because you won’t trust each other as much as you should be able too. What you could learn from George and Lennie is sometimes you have to have a short memory. Those small arguments may seem big in the moment, but in the end they will not matter.
INTRODUCTION It is very palpable that many people tend to criticize love as something that is temporary. Many people also believe that when it comes to love, nothing is forever. This paper would create a big diversion on these rubbish notions about love. For the author, love for him is something that is evergreen or infinite. One must know that love is not the cause of all the problems that one might have.