Peter Singer's Argument Against Vegetarianism
Peter Singer in his essays expands on the concept of speciesism to the public and discusses how the criterion of applying rights to animals and humans is logically inconsistent. The designation of Homo Sapien being the only attribute required for moral importance is too arbitrary. Singer suggests we are to use the clearer requirement of sentience and capacity to feel pleasure and pain to assign moral importance. If this is to be universally applied non-human sentient animals deserve increased moral consideration fitting of their sentient status compared to humans. In this essay I will discuss Peter Singer’s definition of speciesism and through critical analysis look at the roll vegetarianism plays and its incompatibility with his arguments.
Singer argues that a “mental switch” needs to occur in regard to animal treatment during
…show more content…
Many impaired humans exist well below intelligent animals on most measurable qualities that could be deemed “human”. Despite this Singer feels those animals receive far inferior moral consideration than the lowliest human. His solution of vegetarianism though is insufficient as it does not consider the roll animals of plants and the economic outcomes. Meat is considered by him to not be entirely inherently wrong as his argument relies on protein based alternatives feeding the masses. Plants may even fit some of his criteria for moral consideration but regardless animals who could be engineered artificially to have the same sentience as plants would be equally as acceptable a substitute. If the masses suddenly become vegetarian their lives are not “free of cruelty” as the meat industries would need to continue to function now with tighter margins. Switching likely to producing cheaper meat based animal feed or billions of livestock would be slaughtered needlessly
Peter Singer's Utilitarian Theory On The Ethical Treatment Of Non-Human Animals
860 Words | 4 PagesIn the film, "Louis Theroux's African Hunting Party", South African wild game farmers advocate trophy hunting as a necessary activity for saving certain species from inevitable extinction due to illegal wildlife poaching. However, when considering Peter Singer's utilitarian theory on the ethical treatment of non-human animals, the process of shooting and killing an animal to preserve its species seems counterintuitive. Applying Singer's perspective, my position is that trophy hunting is morally unacceptable as it reasserts speciesism by disregarding the suffering of the animals being murdered for sport. Indeed, the act of purchasing a hunting permit so that a person may kill an animal for its material value dismisses the animal's personhood.
Analysis Of Michael Pollan´s An Animal's Place
324 Words | 2 PagesIn An Animal’s Place, Michael Pollan describes the growing acknowledgement of animal rights, particularly America’s decision between vegetarianism and meat-eating. However, this growing sense of sentiment towards animals is coupled with a growing sense of brutality in farms and science labs. According to Pollan, the lacking respect for specific species of animals lies in the fact that they are absent from human’s everyday lives; enabling them to avoid acknowledgment of what they are doing when partaking in brutality towards animals. He presents arguments for why vegetarianism would make sense in certain instances and why it would not and ultimately lead to the decision of eating-meat while treating the animals fairly in the process. Pollan
An Analysis Of Against Meat By Jonathan Safran Foer
1009 Words | 5 PagesIntroduction In this article “Against Meat” (2009) Jonathan Safran Foer explains his experience from a young age until the present struggling whether being a vegetarian or an omnivore because he doesn’t want to hurt animals at the same time he can’t resist food because it tasted good. Jonathan Safran Foer is an American novelist (born February 21, 1977) He graduated from Princeton University with a degree in philosophy, in his freshman year he took a writing class from the novelist Joyce Carol.
Assess The Significance Of Norcross's Analogy
553 Words | 3 PagesHe explains of the stress filled lives these animals endure for the pleasure of humans. The humans are not properly aware of the situations of these animals. They are consistently in cramped cages in farms, while human’s sense of morality towards farm animals has been nonexistent. Norcross’s conclusion does not argue against eating meat, but he justifies it to an extent. Norcross compares two distinctive creatures in his argument, and their comparison does not justify his point of view.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral
755 Words | 4 PagesThis short story explains and questions how people find eating animals morally acceptable. Steiner 's short story explains that whenever people think these animals are being treated respectfully they are being ignorant to the fact of how these animals are truly treated; Steiner brings up the fact of how an animals typical horrid life is and how it transitions from its horrid life to being killed by a butcher in a matter of seconds. Moreover, Steiner also adheres to the topic of how unacceptable, it is to kill these animals just for human consumption. Steiner 's purpose in writing this short story is to display to us the fact that eating any animal is not only wrong, but it is just downright unacceptable as it is mass murder of these innocent animals. Finally, Steiner tries to define at his best, what a strict vegan truly
Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals
862 Words | 4 PagesMany Americans blindly believe that animals deserve the same rights as humans, but little do they know about the differences between the welfare of animals and the rights of animals. In the article A Change of Heart about Animals, Jeremy Rifkin cleverly uses certain negative words in order to convince the readers that animals need to be given same rights as humans, and if not more. Research has shown that non-human animals have the ability to “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love” (Rifkin 33). Animals may be able to feel emotions, however this does not necessarily mean that they are able to understand what having rights mean. While humans must accept their moral responsibility to properly care for animals,
Summary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals By Jeremy Rifkin
713 Words | 3 PagesShe also believes that animals should be treated compassionately and that humans and animals aren’t very different in their feelings and abilities ; which is supported by the studies in Rifkin’s article. She asserts that animals deserve not only our love and respect but that they “have a right to live without being confined, exploited, tormented, or eaten.” She elaborates on this, explaining it as a vegan or vegetarian lifestyle without animal experimentation and fur or leather. Her beliefs are supported by the similarities between animals and humans proven by Rifkin’s studies. For example, the studies funded by McDonald’s found that pigs can suffer from depression and crave affection.
Conscientious Meat Eater Analysis
796 Words | 4 PagesIn the article, “Is It Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater”, the authors argue that processed meat can greatly affect the many things in our everyday life. Sunaura and Alexander’s argument is significantly unreliable because of the certain professions both authors yield. As stated in the article “Sunaura is an artist, writer, and activist in Oakland.” “Alexander’s profession is studying philosophy, and ethics in Athens, Georgia.” This shows that neither of them are qualified to argue in the subject of conscientious meat eaters.
Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis
782 Words | 4 PagesIn this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.
A Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer
673 Words | 3 PagesIn the article All Animals Are Equal, written by Peter Singer addresses the inadequacies surrounding the rights of animals in the societies of today. Singer opens the article by presenting a scholarly parallels between the fight for gender equality, banishment of racism and the establishment of rights for “nonhumans.” In order to explain this constant set of inequalities that seem to riddle our society, Singer readily uses the term “speciesism”, which he acquired from a fellow animals rights advocator, Richard Ryder. Essentially, this term is defined by Singer as a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species. Singer claims that if this idea of speciesism
Arguments Against Alastair Norcross
742 Words | 3 PagesAlastair Norcross takes the position in the animal rights argument that torturing animals for their use is unacceptable. He asks to consider a case where a man, Fred, lost his ability to enjoy chocolate because he lost the ability to produce Cocoamone. Fred’s doctor tells him that a recent study shows that, when puppies are tortured and then brutally killed, they produce cocoamone that Fred can then harvest. So Fred sets up his basement where he can torture puppies and then slaughter them in order to taste chocolate again. Norcross claims that this is obviously wrong and draws a correlation between Fred’s case and the situation where we cause chickens to suffer in order to mass produce their meat.
Themes Of Drew Hayden Taylor's Alternatives
1161 Words | 5 PagesWe consider ourselves equals” (115). In addition, compared to Bobby and the Indigenous peoples living in reserves, Michelle’s social status is higher, and therefore, she can “afford the idealism… [as] being a vegetarian can be expensive especially up north and other remote places” (115). Pragmatically thinking of the reality of most Indigenous peoples, Bobby perceives the factualness of vegetarianism as “another example of middle-class Canada saying their lifestyle is better than everybody else” (115). Although he criticizes vegetarians with a “superiority complex” (116) like Michelle, he doesn’t disapprove of vegetarian devout groups as it’s simply a “part of their religion” (116).
Summary: An Omnivore's Dilemma
1766 Words | 8 PagesIn Michael Pollan’s book, An Omnivore’s Dilemma, we are focused on many different views of eating meat and other foods that are products of animals. The majority of those who chose to consume
Rhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'
422 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Analysis “Down on the factory farm” The last thing that comes to our mind when we order a piece of steak at a restaurant is how that animal we are about to eat was being treated while they were alive. According to author Peter Singer’s article "Down on the factory farm” he questions what happened to your dinner when it was still an animal? He argues about the use and abuse of animals raised for our consumption. In Singer’s article he states personal facts and convincing statistics to raise a legitimate argument.
Eating Meat Is Ethical Essay
768 Words | 4 PagesIn today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.
More about Peter Singer's Argument Against Vegetarianism
Peter Singer's Utilitarian Theory On The Ethical Treatment Of Non-Human Animals
860 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Michael Pollan´s An Animal's Place
324 Words | 2 PagesAn Analysis Of Against Meat By Jonathan Safran Foer
1009 Words | 5 PagesAssess The Significance Of Norcross's Analogy
553 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral
755 Words | 4 PagesJeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals
862 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals By Jeremy Rifkin
713 Words | 3 PagesConscientious Meat Eater Analysis
796 Words | 4 PagesBonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis
782 Words | 4 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer
673 Words | 3 PagesArguments Against Alastair Norcross
742 Words | 3 PagesThemes Of Drew Hayden Taylor's Alternatives
1161 Words | 5 PagesSummary: An Omnivore's Dilemma
1766 Words | 8 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'
422 Words | 2 PagesEating Meat Is Ethical Essay
768 Words | 4 Pages