When an adult has to stay home from work they are losing money due to the fact that they are not getting paid to go to work and they have to spend money on medicine and doctors visits. In Addition, reams of money could be saved in not just the US but the whole world. As said by UNICEF, an organization that helps children all over the world “That $6.2 billion could be saved in treatment costs if the vaccines were more prominent in the world’s poorest countries. ”(“Should Any Vaccines Be Required for Children” n.pag.). When people in our world get vaccinations, they help others by not getting others sick so they are saving money on medical costs as well as the person that got the vaccine.
What do you do when charitable organizations call you asking for money? Do you donate money to the organization or do you ignore it? In 1999 Peter Singer wrote the article The Singer Solution to World Poverty where he argues “that each one of us with wealth surplus to his or her essential needs should be giving most of it to help people suffering poverty so dire as to be life-threatening.” Singer accomplishes this by introducing his article with two exceptionally different examples: a woman who saved a child’s life and a man who killed a child to save his Bugatti. Secondly, he proposes how much money would be required to save a child from starvation, $200, and explains why a majority people do not give even though $200 is not actually that much money considering what people on other desires. Third, he acknowledges that it would be counterproductive to ask people to give too much, especially when a majority do not believe that they need to give above and over their fair share; he even points out that this also applies to countries with the United States giving .09% when the recommendation is .7%.
More people are likely to donate if they would be rewarded so that they are helped just like the recipitant. She states that there are several donors in third world countries that would gladly give away their kidney’s for only the cost of $1,000. They are in such a desperate time they would sell their body parts, just to help their family survive. Another reason why organ sales should be legal is because it would stop the illegal trade of kidney’s. In the illegal trade of kidney’s, no one has the interests of the seller.
One of the main reasons why I side with Singer is the belief that if everyone just gave a little of their pay each month it wouldn 't be asking for a lot(Singer, 1972, 233). Just like we get tax dollars taken out of our paycheck I believe that we should do the same for charities and it would only be a small donation therefore it wouldn 't have a huge impact on your life. Especially when talking about donating to charities that are helping build back communities after natural disasters. I believe that these people didn 't choose this life and therefore shouldn 't have to suffer when we can help. Another reason I agree with Singer is that I truly believe people are greedy and I am guilty of this but to an extent.
Just a kidney transplant can cost around $260,000 stated in the article How Much Does a Transplant Cost. Many people think that they will end up having to pay for the cost of the surgery but it goes on the recipient 's insurance. If someone is hospitalized, the medical staff provides the best possible care, regardless of organ donor status. Donation is only considered after a patient has been declared dead by a medical physician. In a article Health Guidance said by being an organ donor you can actually help to save more than one life, rather it can help to save several and a single donor may touch the lives of up to 50 people.
By providing a specific number, $200, Singer demonstrates how simple and reasonable it is to save a child in poverty. Additionally, he repeats, “to save a child’s life,” which demonstrates exactly what a $200 donation could do for a child in poverty. As an example, Singer references a credible philosopher, Peter Unger, and acknowledges that “by his calculation, $200 in donations would help a sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old.” Next, he establishes, “if you were to give up dining out just for one month, you would easily save that amount.” Singer emphasizes this to show the reader how simple it is to save $200, and, more importantly, save the life of a helpless child. By repeating this number multiple times, following with “to save a child’s life,” throughout his essay, Singer implies a rational yet urgent tone in order to convince the reader that if they donate, they will save a
Although many people think “oh yeah, you’re helping someone out, so they don’t die”, but really no one really going to think that thoroughly. Therefore, not many people think it through when they get the opportunity to become a donor. One thing that sticks out in my mind is my grandpa and mom. Roughly around ten years ago my grandpa had a kidney transplant, he waited eight years for one. My mom said how she would never donate anything because the way we come into the world is the way we go it.
People can help their own community with their own money putting in fixing things they see wrong. Americans donate twice as much as individuals in other rich nations, but only a fraction goes to help the people where the greatest need and where a dollar goes the furthest. Donations don't help the people who need the most aid. There are cures for cancer that seems like
This disease typically occurs in children and when infected is very serious. Brady was only three years old. If he had only received proper treatment beforehand, his life could have easily been saved and this outcome could have been completely averted. For this reason, it is imperative that children be vaccinated. The pluses for infant vaccines outweigh the negatives.
It is because children are born in undeveloped countries that might have an illness happening that could end their life and the country might not have the proper medicine needed. The only solution is to come to the United States and offer them the proper medicine needed to save their child 's life. Every year there’s more than 300,000 to 400,000 children born to illegal immigrants in the United States. It comes to the conclusion that parents come to the United States in order for their children to be born in a place where their child 's future would be brighter than theirs. It is stated in the 14th Amendment that if you are born in the United States you are officially a United States citizen, so why shouldn 't they come to the United States for exceptional opportunities?
There has to be some type of insurance that is affordable for every person that provides them with at least the minimum benefits. Some health benefits are better than none at all. This will give people a higher expectancy of living a longer life, as oppose to somebody who has no medical coverage. Our lack of universal coverage has consequences. According to government and private studies, about 22,000 of our fellow Americans die each year of treatable diseases because they lack insurance and can’t afford a doctor.