Question 1: General David Petraeus’ critical thinking regarding the Afghanistan surge decision was strongly influenced by the critical thinking elements point of view and assumptions while examining the decision primarily through the ethical lens of teleology. Petraeus’ critical thinking point of view based on the concept of counterinsurgency concept and his success in Iraq influenced his critical thinking process. Petraeus’ critical thinking assumption that a counterinsurgency campaign was the only way forward in Afghanistan also impacted his critical thinking. Petraeus examined the Afghanistan surge decision primarily through the ethical lens of teleology which played a significant role in his critical thinking point of view. …show more content…
Kotter stated that, “individual or organizational change at its most basic involves three processes: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing.” In 1943, Eisenhower’s reluctance to change the organization was evident by his unwillingness to address inept Allied commanders or make any organizational structure changes. General Marshall counseled Eisenhower on his complete authority to manage senior U.S. military leaders in his command. By 1944, Eisenhower’s organization of the new Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force and his prevention of the creation of any separation headquarters between him and the field commanders made it evident that his abilities to manage change had evolved. As Eisenhower started to suspect the Allied Forces as an organization was unsustainable, he established an acting deputy commander in chief for air operations, directed General Patton to assess the problems in Tunisia, and directed Major General Ernest Harmon to assess II Corps. After General Marshall’s visit, it was clear Eisenhower felt empowered to finally make changes he had been reluctant to make that included unfreezing the Allied Forces to make organizational changes and to align resources and priorities to realize his long term vision for Allied Forces. Eisenhower learned quickly that …show more content…
Relationship management is defined as handling others emotions with the leadership tools of persuasion, conflict management, and collaboration. Almost from the beginning, Eisenhower struggled with cultural squabbling among senior leaders within the Allied Forces. Early on, senior British leaders thought Eisenhower was, “…too soft and inexperienced to be in command of a large multinational force.” There were many instances where General Patton and other senior U.S. military leaders thought Eisenhower was too pro-British and was betraying the U.S. Army. By 1944, Eisenhower was described by senior British military leaders as, “…he has a generous and loveable character,” ”just a coordinator, a good mixer, a champion of inter-allied co-operation,” “…completely sincere, straightforward and very modest,” Eisenhower had learned over time to effectively use persuasion, conflict management, and collaboration within the Allied Forces to manage the cultural differences. Eisenhower risked his prior long term relationships with senior U.S. military leaders in order to build relationships and persuade and build relationships with the British senior military leaders and civilian leadership. Once Eisenhower improved his interpretation and management of the strategic
On July 30, 2008, a bloody battle involving Coalition forces took place in the mountainous eastern Afghan province of Nuristan. This was the Battle of Wanat and the devastating amount of Coalition casualties began a vigorous investigation by the United States Army. The village of Wanat, defended by Second Platoon, Chosen Company, Second Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team would fall victim to numerous bad decision made by higher command. Although the men of Chosen Company fought hard, they ended up surrounded, vastly outnumbered, and without any Battalion assets. This paper will argue the reasons for the disastrous outcome of the Battle of Wanat; examining the effective company leadership exploiting effective
Analyzing the mission command principles and the commanding officer’s actions will also be discussed. Specifically, as it relates to building a cohesive team through mutual trust, providing a clear commander’s intent, and accepting prudent risk. While the battle of Fort Riviere and the resulting occupation of Haiti occurred over a century ago, it provides us with an example of American foreign policy during this period and bares resemblance to future American military
General Hooker’s commanders’ activity can be analyzed to help better understand why he made the decisions he made, retreating to a defensive posture and failing to use his numbers to his advantage to attack or conduct a successful counter attack. It is important to first understand how Commanders drive the operations
Abrams also stressed a “one war” concept that put equal emphasis on military operations, improvement of the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces, and pacification – all of which are codependent so that the better we do in one, the more our chance of progress in others (18). The changes in tactics under Abrams, and in the concept of the nature of the war, and even the enemy reaction to battlefield reserves, by no means meant an end to fierce combat, or even to large-scale military operations (138). America’s principal national objective became peace. Abrams policy proved to be better than the policy of attrition. The policy of attrition simply meant, under those circumstances, a very prolonged type of warfare, whereas the U.S. can clear and hold, and keep an area secure, and keep the enemy out.
General Petraeus and his Leadership Approach to Mosul A Leaders Restoration of a Nation Following the invasion of Coalition Forces into Iraq in March of 2003 the Army’s 101st Airborne Division, commanded by Major General David Petraeus, found itself in the Northern Iraqi city of Mosul (Lundberg, 2008). With the invasion complete and capturing of the capitol city of Baghdad accomplished, Major General Petraeus and staff began confronting the issues and concerns of what lay ahead for the duration of the unit’s deployment (Lundberg, 2008). The development and implementation of Major General David Petraeus’ strategy to bring stability to Mosul, Iraq and surrounding areas following the 2003 invasion provides insight into his leadership approach
This becomes evident in September, 1940, when President Franklin Roosevelt decided to enter into an agreement with the British ambassador (Doc. F). The agreement provided Britain with critical destroyer ships from the United States for eight valuable defense base stations. When President Roosevelt decided to provide Britain with the destroyer ships it indicated a siding with the allies, and will change the mindset of most Americans to ‘all aid short of war” as neutrality was breached. Also, this change of stance came with Britain being the last one standing against Hitler within Europe since people feared the war reaching the Western Hemisphere, if not kept within Europe. In consideration to keeping the war out of America, President Franklin Roosevelt will highlight how ‘we’ must do everything to help the British Empire defend itself (Doc. H).
Dwight was always talking to foreign countries, to make sure they had everything needed so there were no wars. The tasks he had to perform made it necessary for him to be closely involved in national and international political maneuvers, but he succeeded in defining them in neutral terms. This shows that Eisenhower was always making sure he made everyone happy so he did not have to deal with countries being angry at
Book Review 2: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Cold War Crises by Richard Betts Summary: Betts starts off his book by recognizing the ambiguity around the advocacy of the use of force in a crisis by military leaders even though there is a prevalent assumption that military professionals are more aggressive than diplomats and politicians. He states he writes the book in order to provide a comprehensive survey of the postwar role of American military men in decisions on their most essential function, their use of force in combat. Betts acknowledges the vast availability of literature on military participation in decisions on defense budgets and weapons procurement, but feels there is a void when looking at decision-making from the perspective of military leadership versus civilian leadership.
General Patton, in the Battle of the Bulge exercised the principles of mission command to the fullest and they yielded significantly great results for the Allied forces. General Patton employed each of the principles in different ways in order to ensure that the German surprise attack did not significantly set back the Allied forces in the war. The exercise of mission command allows a commander to conduct military operations and missions through dispersed execution. According to Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 6-0, Mission Command, the definition of mission command is “the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations”. General Patton exhibited four of the mission command principles extremely well during the Battle of the Bulge.
By definition, “mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower agile and adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations,” according to ADRP 5-0. Mission command is about knowing when to change the task to fit the purpose. This paper is intended to analyze the mission command of one side of the battle, focusing on the commander’s role in the operations process. The Battle of Bunker Hill was the most important battle of the American Revolution because of Colonel Prescott’s superior command and control.
Eisenhower was promoted to the rank General of the Army in December 1944. He was an operational command of NATO force in Europe. 28. General Dwight Eisenhower was a matured and an old man but achieved success in military strategic goals in order to gain winning situation at most of his fully committed carrier as a great gentlemen and leader. When General Eisenhower was appointed as a Supreme Allied Commander for the planned Normandy Landings he suggested that
B. Leadership Styles Whether he envisioned his impressive future or not, his leadership skills ultimately guided his career trajectory (Lopez, 2014). Powell’s leadership styles allowed him to contribute in guiding his country to the right decisions. While in the administrative office, he shared his thoughts about the conflicts in some Middle East countries, weapons of mass destruction, and the country’s intelligence information capacity. Guided by his leadership styles, he was able to create plans that could be effective in ensuring peace and order to his country. Despite the difficulties, politicians and foreign leaders encounter, for Powell, effective leadership comes from those who have the ability to inspire a population
A Commander sustains an ethical command climate in war by establishing clear intent and purpose for their organization, accentuated through his vision. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Law of War are the military guidelines and penalties for soldiers to act accordingly. Distinctively, the majority of people know the difference between right and wrong. Command team (i.e. Commander and NCOs) are role models for the organization and set the example for their subordinates, which led to sustaining an ethical climate. Discipline organization exhibits high physical fitness, technical competence and successfully accomplish the mission.
At the beginning of the Civil War, leaders in the North and South understood the imperative task of selecting the best possible men to lead their troops. Both sides needed to find men of outstanding character in order to succeed in their war efforts. Accordingly, Robert E. Lee showed himself as exactly such a man. In agreement Abraham Lincoln sought out Lee, an accomplished U.S. military veteran with 32 years of service, to lead the Union troops. Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederacy, knew Lee lived in Virginia, a state that had succeeded from the Union.
Educated at West Point, George S. Patton (1885-1945) began his military career leading cavalry troops against Mexican forces and became the first officer assigned to the new U.S. Army Tank Corps during World War I. Promoted through the ranks over the next several decades, he reached the high point of his career during World War II, when he led the U.S. 7th Army in its invasion of Sicily and swept across northern France at the head of the 3rd Army in the summer of 1944. Late that same year, Patton’s forces played a key role in defeating the German counterattack in the Battle of the Bulge, after which he led them across the Rhine River and into Germany, capturing 10,000 miles of territory and liberating the country from the Nazi regime. Patton