Phar-Mor Inc., Waste Management, and WorldCom Frauds In the fraud case of Phar-Mor Inc., Waste Management, and WorldCom, the auditors not only failed to discover these companies fraudulent financial reporting but some even help in guidance to continue fraud schemes. Andersen Accounting helps Waste Management in their fraudulent activities by issuing unqualified audit reports of the company’s false financial statements, and engaged in a secret agreement to write-off error of data over the periods of up to ten years and to change accounting practices. Andersen Accounting certified WorldCom’s false financial data of capitalized expenses and false account receivables of $11 billion was all in accordance with GAAP rules. Coopers & Lybrand fails …show more content…
It was a multiyear false financial reporting committed by the founder and five other former top officers. These defendants “cooked the books”. They committed these frauds for personal gains driven by their greed and wanting to maintain their top-level positions. Company’s revenues wasn’t meeting the targets, so the defendants manipulated financial data by deferring current period expenses and inflating the current period earnings. To continue on these fraud schemes, they engaged themselves in multiple improper accounting practices. The fraudulent activities includes avoiding depreciation expense on garbage trucks by inflating salvage values and extended useful lives not set as industry standards, reporting false salvage values on other assets, ignore recording necessary write off of costs of abandoned landfill development projects, failed to decrease the value of landfills when it is use to fill waste, inflated revenue so top officers can earn large amounts of compensation in bonuses, inflated reserves account so that the excess can be used to avoid reporting unrelated expenses, and failed to set up an reserves account to pay for incomes taxes. The founder and five other former top officer are charged for using accounting manipulation known as “netting” and “geography” to make the financial looks better. The netting was use to falsify financial data of $490 million of current period operating expenses and offsetting prior period accounting to unrelated one-time gains on sale or exchange of assets. The geography entries was used to move millions of dollars between line items on the income statement to make the financial look
After looking at the information and evidence laid out before us, we have came to the conclusion that Mrs. Horatio Van Bliven was a fraud. First of all, the glass was shattered from the inside. We think this way because, the glass shards were found on the outside balcony. If the glass was shattered from the outside, the glass would have fallen inside of the hotel room. This eliminates Samuel Schmidt from committing the crime because he could not have broke the glass from the inside.
Approximately 90 percent of the company's revenue was fraudulent, according to prosecutors (Murphy, Kim; Miller, Alan C, 1988). A superseding indictment was won by prosecutors on June
While the main focus of the case is the owner, the article briefly mentions that four of the owner's employees conspired along with him, and that they all had pleaded guilty whereas the owner elected to settle the claims against him in court. After working through the language of the court case, I was
COMES NOW R. Mark Armstrong, PG (pro se) (“Plaintiff”), and hereby files a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial under seal; while it is reviewed by the Department of Justice. The causes of action includes, but are not limited to: 1. Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses 42 U.S.C Section 1983 First Amendment as controlled by Garcetti_v._Ceballos1, the speech the Plaintiff was terminated for was not job required or job related. The Plaintiff spoke of unethical conduct that is basically bribery.
COMES NOW R. Mark Armstrong, pro se (“Plaintiff”), and hereby files a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial. The causes of action include but are not limited to: 1) Qua Tam (Claims A, B and C) Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) (1972) [33 U.S.C. § 1367] : Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (1976) [42 U.S.C. § 6971] : FCA, 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)-(g) 2)Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) 18 U.S.C. §1961 et seq., 3) Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (Claim A) First Amendment as controlled by Garcetti_v._Ceballos Violations, (Claim B) Fourteenth Amendment Violations, 4) Retaliation under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), 5) Intentional infliction of emotional distress, for prima facie tort Tortuous Breach of Implied Covenant
They claimed "the company had coached clients on improper tax workarounds that cost the agency as much as $712 million in wrongly awarded refunds"
Monus response was to fix the numbers before Finn showed the reports to Phar-Mor’s board of directors, and because this was an internal paper it didn’t make it illegal. The fraud consisted in misappropriation of assets, falsification of financial statements, and Phar-Mor’s relationship with its suppliers. Monus initially distributed the losses into the hundreds of other Phar-Mor stores as increase in inventory by issuing fake invoices and manipulating the cost of goods sold. Phar-Mor also counted with two sets of books, one with the real losses and another one with the fraudulent information that would be shown to the auditors.
February 27, 2017 Tax File Memorandum FROM: Derrek Mason SUBJECT: Shelly Zumaya and Kiwi Corporation Tax Liability FACTS: Shelly Zumaya is the president and sole shareholder of Kiwi Corporation (stock basis of $400,000). Kiwi Corporation, incorporated in 2003, is in the business of purchasing and reselling used farming equipment. In December 2012, Kiwi transferred its entire inventory (basis of $1.2 million) to Shelly Zumaya in a transaction that was recorded as a sale.
Another pressure presented in this case for Cendant Corporation was that for the top management once again. The top management needed to have their financial information seem profitable, therefore pressured the accountant of the company to falsify and “cook the books” to make the financial statements seem actually “profitable” when it wasn’t what It really was. As said in the previous question, income smoothing was used in this case by Cendant Corporation as an unethical practice to make the investors believe that their shares were all bright
The CEO made poor decisions that made the situation unethical and illegal. Which caused Sully and Mike to “blow the
1. From the excerpt and article, describe the rationalizations used by Mr. Pavlo? Pavlo said in an interview that he wanted to advance his career and was very eager to make his way to the top level position of the management of the organization (Portal, 2008). He also told that he was rewarded always by doing bad things. Although, he was at pressure in meeting the company’s goals; but he managed his superiors and made sure that he was doing good in fulfilling the company’s goals.
ENRON/ ANDERSEN SCANDAL To preserve the integrity of his reports, the accountants must insist upon absolute independence of judgment and action. The necessity of preserving this position of independence indicates certain standards of conduct. If the confidence of the public in the integrity of accountants’ reports is shaken, their value is gone (Arthur Andersen in a 1932 Lecture on Business Ethics). The purpose of accounting is fairly simple, that is to measure that the portrait the company’s accountants’ paint in the financial statements is as accurate as possible (Ronald Duska, Brenda Shay Duska and Julie Ragatz 2011).
In many different ways, fraudulent activity towards/in a company can be one thing you don’t want to see. A lot of these fraudulent activities towards these firms or even in them begin to worsen as the years go on and it’s an endless cycle until someone is caught in the act of the activity. A well-known writer for the Atlanta news, spoke on some employees from an airline company that were sentenced to around a seven years service in a Federal prison for fraud that costs the company roughly thirty-seven million dollars at the time that the incident accord. Both parties invoiced had been doing this in the workplace for no reason at all, the author writes, “Anderson, an employee since 1977, falsely confirmed Airborne Voice and Data had performed the services” (Visser). It doesn't stop here, both of these guys had been doing years before in 1999 and even years after that, but in the case of this story they both were able to receive the payments by one of them sending the invoices to the other.
Fraudulent Transfer Marcadis Singer, PA, assists lenders in recuperating their assets and money when there is a Fraudulent Transfer or conveyance. Setting Aside Illegal Transfers In cases where a debtor has moved property or assets to a family member, close friend, or any other insider to evade paying for a judgment, he could be legally responsible for a fraudulent transfer. Our Florida Attorneys will help you with such claims, which are based mostly on the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, FL Civil Code Chapter 26.
Background WorldCom, once known as one of the most powerful telecommunication organizations of the world, is now studied as a case of a fraudulent company that carried out unethical financial activities to cover its weakening position in the market. After some aggressive investment decisions, the company started to witness huge financial pressure. The management used various forged accounting entries to conceal its weakening position. Cynthia Cooper, Vice President Internal Audit, discovered the unethical activities and raised the issue with the management and relevant departments and received bitter responses. She carried out internal audits in her own capacity with her colleagues and compiled evidence against fraudulent activities.