Philip Roth's Tripartite Views Of Sabbath's Theater

775 Words4 Pages
Philip Roth charges Sabbath’s Theater with a multi-faceted type of obscenity. At first, the borderline-psychopathic protagonist, Mickey Sabbath, seems like the archetype of sexual perversion and insatiability; and— what is worse— Sabbath is unfazed by his disgraced state. Yet, even through all his cringing qualities, Sabbath transcends his vices: Roth writes in a manner that prompts sympathy for him. For example, the reader gains insight into his internal hauntings— namely, the death of his brother, who left behind only his good taste in music, and of his mother, whose ghost plagues him. Sabbath then quips about the captivating diversity of skin color in Brazilian women. Given, Sabbath’s outright objectification of women is likely to spur controversy, but it is unlikely that his words would be censured in contemporary times. So what marks the threshold by which Plato would unquestionably censure this novel? In order to dissect Plato’s hypothetical stance on Sabbath’s Theater, it is important to understand his tripartite theory of the soul which inherently sheds light on his views on obscenity. Plato believed that the soul was divided into a pyramid consisting of three pieces. The topmost and smallest part is the logical side, composed of “nobler” or “higher” impulses that seek only truth. Furthermore, the topmost part also represent the most rational side of the being. The middle section is labeled as thymos, which can be described as the Greek word that stands for the

More about Philip Roth's Tripartite Views Of Sabbath's Theater

Open Document