The purpose of the study done on cell phone ringing during a lecture was to determine if a cell phone ringing during a lecture would impact learning. The hypothesis was that the students in the ringing condition would not remember content from the interruption and therefore the students would not learn as well. The study was done by randomly assigning participants to either a ringing group or the non-ringing control group. The participants were asked to watch an educational video and take notes as they would be given a test at the end of the section. In the ringing group a confederate’s phone rang twice throughout the study at specific times. The results of the study showed that participants in the ringing control group did worse on test …show more content…
In both studies the researchers were looking at divided attention. The study about cell phone ringing was seeing how people’s learning would be affected when a student had both the lecture and ringing to pay attention to. In the study about note taking, divided attention was also tested because the first set of students had to take notes as well as listen to a lecture, compared to the second set of students who did not have to divide their attention. Divided attention is the process of doing two or more things at once; it can only be done if all of the tasks do not require more resources than is available. Most people are not able to multitask and therefore having to take notes while listening and participating in a lecture is not possible. It also means that when attention is divided between a cell phone and the notes, the students are likely not able to pay attention to both and learning will suffer. The cell phone also activated orientating attention, which is a basic type of input attention. The process to turn and pay attention to the ringing of the phone is automatic and does not require a lot of effort. They do not have to choose to pay attention to the stimuli, but it does take away attention from the other things they are trying to do. For selective attention people choose what to pay attention to. The second study tested this by seeing if students would choose to pay attention to the lecture when they did not have to take notes. Selective attention is only paying attention to one stimulus, while ignoring everything else in the environment. Students are voluntarily using mental resources to focus on the material in the lecture while they could be focusing on other stimuli in the
People have different learning styles and abilities, and some may find it easier to multitask than to focus on one task. Clear acknowledges that some individuals are better at multitasking than others, but he does not address the implications of this
The Stroop Effect and the Horse Race Model Phenomena Rochelle Hall City University of New York- Brooklyn College Abstract Introduction The Stroop test phenomena was first introduced to the world of Experimental Psychology by J.R. Stroop in the year 1935. This landmark article has since influenced the research and publication of over 700 other Stroop-related articles. MacLeod (1991, p. 163).
Also how some teachers deducted grades from students because of the use of cell phones during
You could a do the same study and get similar results if you have half of the students allowed to read a book. Any distraction during a lecture would effect your performance in a class. Pinker
Rubinkam’s Texting in Class is Rampant explains how most highschool and college students use their phones during class and lectures. Rubinkam reports that , “The anonymous survey of 269 Wilkes students found that nine in 10 admit to sending text messages during class-and nearly half say it's easy to do so undetected. Even more troubling, 10 percent say that they have sent or received texts during exams and 3 percent admit to using their phones to cheat.” Rubinkam uses logos to show how many students use their phones during class. The amount of students that do is frightening to most teachers because most teachers do not even notice it.
Attention has always been a prized commodity. The brain knows it and cognitive psychologists know it, but the average person has yet to fully grasp the concept. Articles on how to multi-task still flag the covers of popular magazines, and distracting cell phones and tablets accompany students to class on the forefront of their desks next their notes. It has been verified time and time again that the mind simply cannot attend to two things simultaneously; one can pay attention to one thing or another, but not to two things at once. People know that neutralizing distractions will yield invaluable minutes of clarity and focus, but for most, the application of such, is nearly impossible.
Shut down your screen” week is something our school should take part in. It would be very helpful, even if it’s just for a week. It could service us in the future, it helps us communicate with our teachers and peers, and it will keep us concentrated. Participating in “Shut down your screen” week will assist students remember the material.
After observing the clients behavior, it is evident that she has a problem limiting her excessive cellular device usage. Therefore, the behavioral intervention plan will be targeting the client’s cellular device usage in class, as well as outside of class. The plan will be targeting all cellular device usage, which includes playing games, texting, scrolling though social media sites, and finally listening to music. To prevent the client from using her phone during lectures, the behavioral plan instructed her professors to make her write an essay whenever she is using her phone.
Although Kahn is convinced that a cell phone ringing in a class will leave the surrounding students “significantly impair[ed],” one might disagree about the level to which other students even notice (197). Be assured, there have been moments during class discussions where phones have gone off and no other student has noticed. Though I agree with much of what Kahn stands for, I am not persuaded that a ringing phone leaves students with such impairment. The average student can decide the amount to which such an event will influence their attention and be able to readjust if the event skewed them off course. While a cell phone in a classroom has the potential to distract one from the material being taught, the lack thereof has helped seen an increase in grade and an increase in extra credit
Sixty five percent of students sneak their phones in school, and are distracted by it.” This means that other students are losing focus while trying to learn. Teachers also have a hard time teaching when a cell phone is constantly interrupting the class. The effect of this are students and teachers will not be able to continue on working lesson plans. The Results of this is kids falling behind on subjects and performing worse than schools who ban phones.
Could Phones in Class Be the Key to Learning Seeing a kid in class with their phone out, your first instinct will be telling them to put it away. Although cell phones can be a distraction and used for entertainment purposes they could be used for so much more. Phones should be allowed in classrooms to use as a learning tool, it will help students organize their work, and is cheaper than buying more technology. As you may know, schools are strict on their no phones in class rule.
Especially when someone is trying to get school work done, if they start using their phone, then it takes them so much longer to get that work done than if they had just put the phone down and do it. Smartphones are too much of a distraction to people, and it is sometimes hard to put them down. People nowadays rely so much on their smartphones and it is not okay. For example, for directions they just use the navigation map on ones phone instead of knowing how to get there by looking at directions.
You could be doing anything you want with that phone which is the one problem with having it with you in the first place. You could be texting someone, or playing games. “Who knows”. However, I will be sharing some of the biggest problems of having a phone with you in class and how to solve them. First of all, one way phones can be a distraction is because of the fact that students might cyberbully each other which could potentially distract or discourage them from learning.
Have you ever think about the effect allowing students using phone in school? B. General Statement: mobile phone is such a wonderful tool for communication, education, work, information and somehow we wonder how we survived before this. By looking at its benefit, do you allowing students using handphone in school? How much it will effect student’s life?
Cell phones can use for many purposes like educational things like projects, calculators, research, and even putting important notes or reminders when a homework or taking notes is due in that day. Cell phones can also use to call or text important people if you forgot some stuff at home, forgot your money and your lunch or snacks , or to let your parents know that you have an activity or tutorials after your school session that day. Cell phones are very useful to us. But, there are arguments against using cell phones during class hours. Cell phones, while they might seem like nothing but destruction and a safety hazard for school across the country are in actually quite the opposite (Mockingbird5,2009).