Picasso vs Matisse Pablo Picasso and Henri Matisse were known as the 20th century rivals and influenced each other in becoming greater artists because they would want to outdo one another. In addition, Pablo Picasso believed that he was superior than everyone else, except Matisse, therefore, this caused the rivalry between each other because he felt threatened by Matisse. For instance, many people viewed Matisse’s artwork, The Blue Nude, as ugly and inhumane, but had the attention of many art critics. Because of this, Picasso was eager to view Matisse’s art piece, but viewed it through competitive eyes. This was when he stated, “If he wants to make a women, let him make a women.. If he wants to make a design, let him make a design” (Picasso). …show more content…
The medium of this work of art is made from oil on canvas. In addition, the art piece is figurative and the style is representational. In this art piece, Picasso used plenty of darker colors, whereas, in Matisse’s painting, “Decorative Figure on an Ornamental Background” he uses much more vibrant colors. For instance, in Matisse’s painting he uses: blue, brown, yellow, green, and white. In comparison, Picasso only uses: brown, white, and yellow. In the painting, “Decorative Figure on an Ornamental Background.” the subject matter, like Picasso’s, is also figurative and and the style is representational. Another difference both paintings have is that Picasso uses distorted lines to make a women figure, whereas, in Matisse’s painting his lines are not distorted and it is easy to notice that there is a women in the painting. In addition, in “Woman in an Armchair” there is not a background pattern and the painting seems plain, but in “Decorative Figure on an Ornamental Background,” Matisse uses patterns and different shapes to bring the painting to life and to have the women figure contrast with the background. One comparison that both paintings have in common would be that both women figures in the paintings are nude and turned to the side revealing one angle of their face. All in all, both paintings have similarities and differences, although Picasso’s painting “Woman in an Armchair” was
Therefore, these two paintings use the same colors, but are drawn
Every artist is different and that goes for the art too. Any piece of art looks different with the shape, style, color, or even smell sometimes. On a canvas, it could have similar brushstrokes and completely different. Also, the reason why they started to paint, either to make money, to gain status, or just for fun. Just like there is differences between artists Henrietta Johnson and John Smibert.
The works of art I chose to compare and contrast are Memento Mori, "To This Favour", 1879 by William Michael Harnett, and Bull Skull, Fruit, Pitcher, 1939 by Pablo Picasso. The symbolism behind these two paintings are very similar. There are also some similarities in the composition of these two paintings, but there are many differences in the composition of these two paintings. The first symbolic similarity is that these paintings have a meaning of death.
The name of the painting adduce to the allegation by Henri Matisse: What I dream of is an art of balance, of purity and serenity, devoid of troubling or depressing subject matter, an art which could be for every mental worker, for the businessman as well as the man of letters, for example, a soothing, calming influence on the mind, something like a good armchair which provides relaxation from physical fatigue.1 What is being suggested on hand is not a visual percept. What Matisse is trying to express is an art of retinal sophistication and visual effortlessness that is juxtaposed and well removed from Futurist vehemence and Cubist structures. Matisse’ s art of pure enduring presence of flatness underneath and above the most vivid illusion of three-dimensional space – balance, tint, pictorial equilibrium and homogenous connections - all of which are considered and employed like artistic constituents of his clear masterpieces. Subsequently, Matisse’s brilliant art has definite aesthetic characteristics: shapes are
Wall paintings taking up large amounts of space and showing some type of movement is what The Hall of Bulls and the Bull Leaping Fresco have in common. The Hall of Bulls show different types of animals such as cows, and horses. Whereas the fresco only shows a bull. They both are drawn with a frontal eye and all four legs showing making them strict profile images. The Hall of Bulls have several different types of drawings, which is basically pointing out to us that there was more than one painter.
The next stop on our tour through modern art is Henri Matisse. Compared to Picasso, Matisse was a temperate man with a bourgeoisie work-ethic yet by no means humble. Indeed, he imagined himself the high-priest of art. Van Gogh influenced both Matisse and Picasso. John Peter Russel exposed him to van Gogh in 1896 and by 1899
Neither side is better or worse, just different, so how could these two paintings be similar? As previously mentioned, these pieces undoubtably
Henri Matisse and Francis Bacon are two very different artists. Matisse liked to paint thin and pretty paintings while Bacon liked to paint think and ugly paintings. Matisse liked to use patterns that often drew your attention to them more than what might be going on in the painting unlike most other paintings. They patterns were almost too much to look at
The physical qualities of Diego Rivera’s “Two Women and a Child” feature an oil on canvas medium. In this painting, Rivera utilizes the fresco technique which according to “A Beginners Guide to the Humanities” is a painting on a surface of plastered wall or ceiling, usually applied when the plaster is wet. Using the fresco technique allows any work of art to have a durable consistency and matte finish. The shapes of the figures have curvilinear lines to accentuate the curves and swirls of their bodies.
Same subject matter to draw two female figures, yet they revealed opposite characteristics and techniques on their canvas, and the paintings contrast in these ways such as color, brushwork, and space.
In the painting the drapes are used to point out the painter`s departure from the traditional form of painting. In the era of Renaissance, the painters perfected the ideal of the human form but Picasso approach to the distortion of the ideal human form led to the remarkable work of art . The painting can be seen as a reflection of the artist`s fear of venereal disease, his perception of mysteriousness of sexual energy and his private affairs with women. The painting consists of an element of psychological anxiety communicated by the masked figures. The effort of labour that Picasso indulged in painting Les Demoiselles D Avignon which is although said to be incomplete work has definitely led to a certain sense of liberation of the artist through his work ,Les Demoiselles DAvignon.
Picasso had many drawings that indirectly supported men to be the superior and wiser. For example, in his La vie painting he drew a naked woman standing beside a man who is wearing underwear, as on the other side there was another woman who was holding a baby. One can judge Picasso as a man who looked at women as sexual objects or mothers depending on what his paintings were about, especially this one. Therefore, one can realize how Picasso’s art has supported the inferiority of
Both Woman with Book and Luncheon at the Boating Party have a central purpose. Both paintings were designed using the technique oil and canvas material. Picasso admired the content that Renoir produced because he represented modern urban life and painted fashionable ladies and gentleman during the 1860s and 1870s. Picasso made several paintings and drawings referring to Renoir and Impressionism. Both paintings use a variety of colors.
One work that captures both Matisse’s respect for Signac and departure from the scientific approach is his early Fauvist piece Luxe, Calme, et Volupté (1904). The sky in this painting contains dots not unlike Neo-Impressionist divisionism, though while Signac and others carefully chose their colors to create maximum harmony, Matisse chooses the colors that border one another according to his own whims and fancies. The goal for Matisse may still well be harmony, though it’s a personal harmony that belongs to the moment at which he painted. In addition, Matisse’s highly individual painting style divorces his work from any
Before analysing further into these figures, It is best to understand who Picasso is, and the historical & personal context of the painting. Picasso was one of the most influential and