Pieter Stuyvesant: A Comparative Analysis

526 Words3 Pages

In the early years of migration to the Americas Jews, like in most parts of Europe, were not welcomed in some communities under the Catholicism power. This then caused some problems of confusion of rules and execution and caused fear for the Jews under the new Constitution, however then creating a time of hope for the Jews in the United States. In the first document of letters between of Pieter Stuyvesant a director of the new colony and Dutch West India Company who Stuyvesant is working under, giving a background of Jews in the Americas getting started under religious toleration. Then with the other two documents show how the Jews get religious freedom in the United States during the antebellum period. Creating hope and forming a new safe …show more content…

However the Company has the same fear but care less about it and cares more about the money they would loss if they lost the Jews community in the company. Thus they created a petition for the Jews to live in there area but not ask for support from the company or the community because of there poor state. Stuyvesant still having a problem with giving Jews liberty but once describing the allowed types of liberty given help get Stuyvesant and the Company on the same page. Giving Jews some liberty but not full liberty, which at that time was how most religions were viewed with religious tolerance and not full liberty. Full religious liberty was given to all even Jews under the new Constitution of the United States. Many were confused and concern of there liberties under the new Constitution. Many wrote the president to ensure and clarify there liberties and as for the Jews ecstatic to hear the answer from the president of complete religious freedom. Washington gives the reply echoing the idea of full religious freedom rather then just toleration and sharing his religious views of rational thinking and natural rights given to all people and government needed to stay

Open Document