Primordial sentiments may arise from an individual's language, place of birth, a particular religion, culture, or traditions and or rituals, but mainly it is derived from an individual's ethnicity. It is important to know that primordialists believe that each individual is born into a nation or ethnic group. A nation is an entity which has been in existence since the beginning to time. According to primordialist theorists, these feelings of attachment of an individual to their ethnic group provides a foundation for a bond with others of the same or similar racial background or geographic origin. An example of this in real life is when two Japanese exchange students who come from different prefectures meet at the University of …show more content…
[2] Bergne was born in the Belgian Congo and lived in occupied Belgium during World War II. During this time, and in his time doing fieldwork around the world, he was able to experience the ethnic conflict and racism. Placing Bergne's explanation on primordialism can be seen through the lens of sociobiology. He claims that ethnic groups and nations should be seen as forms of extended kin groups. He even refers to early ethnic groups as 'inbreeding superfamilies' (Smith 147), and states that genetic 'relatedness' is the determining factor of human cooperation. The question that comes up from this way of thinking is how humans can differentiate between their own kin and the others. The answer that Bergne gives is that humans use cultural markers to identify blood and 'others'. These markers may include language, religion, customs, dress, mannerisms, or …show more content…
Often in many societies, superficial qualities such as the color of one's skin, hair or eyes, and other physical qualities reinforce the common belief of common ancestry. This may be reinforced by a common culture, enemy, or language, these are some of the strongest factors which define a group's identity. These common factors reinforce each other over several generations, and a myth of the race is created. A notable example is the Ancient Romans. Despite being the product of several tribes coming together in the early days of their civilization, they developed the creation myth of Romulus and Remus, which they could use to explain their beginnings of a race despite the fact this story probably didn't happen. However, after several generations, there were 'Romans' who looked a certain way, spoke a specific language, and had a unique culture, and more importantly, the myth or Romulus and Remus were held as the true origin of their civilization. The Romans became a powerful ethnic group which was the regional power for centuries because they were able to create an ethos of their own ethnic group to motivate Romans to fight, kill and die for their cause. Primordialism would look at the Romans and state that the external appearances as well as their shared history, and language is what made the Romans, Romans. This is the strength of the
Experiences with people, places and/or things, shape and affect an individuals choices, either to strengthen or break connections and relationships. Through past and new memories and experiences, we are able to reflect, assess and explore our owns concept of connections. There are however, obstacles and barriers one must meet to fully understand our selves and the complicated world of connections and belongingness. The environment or culture we are exposed in since we were infants for instance, greatly affects our identity- behaviour, values and actions- as we get older. Imagine two people from different countries, one grew up in Cambodia and the other grew up in the US.
The Romans emerged from Italy and formed their culture that can find its roots among an array of native tribes and Greek colonies that populated Italy. There are two parts of the foundation of a Roman’s identity that stemmed from the cultural influences that produced the Romans, their culture and their ideals. The first component of the foundation of the Roman identity is the usage and the incorporation of others’ myths into their own etiological myth. The second part stems from these myths that made the Romans believe that their existence and success was the result of fate. By looking into Virgil’s Aeneid and Sallust’s Conspiracy of Catiline one can see that this two-part foundation produced a society and people that embodied this idea that they were the best parts of all the cultures
This is what creates the cultural differences between people from different countries. These ideas have the power to give people self-sense, as Schwalbe writes “The ideas that hold the social world together tell us who we are” (Schwalbe,
This partition between races ‘consists of identifying
Some might argue that the kid was just an ordinary Cro-Magnon who had adapted to the Ice Age. But Trinkaus disagrees and says, “The kid must be the product of interbreeding over the entire period, not a one-time hybrid produced by star-crossed lovers” (11). The way the Neanderthals lived their life was symbolic to humans on how we live our life. Jared Diamond, article “Race without Color”, was about different regions of the world have some significant characteristics such as dark skin in Africa, but that does not mean that humans can be categorized into groups. He uses biology to determine their biological characteristic such as (skin, fingerprints, lactase, blood type) they all come out differently.
I simply thought (as ignorant and naive as it was) that it was how we were born, just like the colour of our skin. By reading a couple of articles and essays about the influences of culture, I have already found out that members of collectivist cultures tend to be interdependent and to have self-concepts defined in terms of relationships and social obligations and in contrast, members of individualist cultures tend to strive for independence and have self-concepts defined in terms of their own aspirations and achievements. I also learned from psychologist Nalini Ambady that both the structure and function of the human brain throughout its development are shaped by the environment. The social environment, in turn, is shaped by culture. This makes a lot more sense concerning the topic of growing up in a cultured household with strict morals and
In ancient history Romans have always been the dominant force that would build itself back up and strengthen into a major civilization for hundreds of years to come. Although, what a lot of people don’t know is how the Romans initially began or perceived to be created as a people that was born from mythological stories that tied into their own culture at the time. Titus Livius (Livy) was an historian that wrote many books on the history of Rome, but today we will only go through an English translation from 1919 of Livy’ first book. We will be discussing what happened (what was written down as the origin of Rome), some interesting points in the text, and analyze the way Livy wrote/structured his work. Let’s start with a summary of what the book is about.
They often follow or believe in what their great grandparents believed. The identity of person comes from the people pasts, which shapes their unique
Race and ethnicity are two terms which are used interchangeably in every day conversation, however, there is a distinction between the two. Race is a categorization of people who have been singled out as inferior or superior, often on the basis of phenotype – observable physical characteristics such as skin color, hair texture, eye shape, or other selective attributes. Race is a social construct and has been known to change with historical and political events. Contrarily, ethnicity does not necessarily provide visual clues, instead, ethnicity is categorized on the basis of a shared common culture and includes elements such as language, norms, customs, religion, music, art, literature. Ethnic Groups are developed by their unique history
George Best describes in his document how people often misunderstand what race is, thinking it to be the fault of the sun, but he describes in his novel that the dark skin of those who live to the south of him was actually a punishment direct from god for being cruel during the biblical flood, (Doc. 2) [B]. While this explanation relies heavily on simple stories, the attempt to describe why some are different through religion is a way to have people widely conform to modern conceptions of race; people always look to god [C]. In another document, David Hume describes that he believes those with white skin are inherently better than those with darker skin, stating questionable and untrue facts about there never being a major African civilization, see Ghana or Mali.
This means that the closer two peoples ancestral groups lived to each other, the more similar there skin color will be. This concept is not isolated to skin color, but is nearly universally constant among biological variation. It is difficult to argue that race is based upon biology when
In other words, race is understood differently around the world. According to the text book, in West Africa, people are categorized into racial groups based on the status of having noble ancestry and not physical features. Also, according to the article, “Defining Race”, race is categorized base on individuals’ social class status and wealth. Furthermore, the invention of race reflects social, economic, and political aspects in society. For example, White American who has white and black ancestry will be considered as black because black slaves are free source of labor, and white population want to increase the number of labor.
Racial identity plays a role in the physical and psychological features of humans. Physically, humans in different parts of the globe endure different conditions and environments. Humans adapt to their environments and obtain different physical traits, henceforth, these physical traits have become adjacent to race. Psychologically, ancestral prejudices and influences throughout history have lingered through the generations and have impacted modern racial identities and tensions. Ethnic conflicts of the past such as the Social Darwinist theory of a "superior race" are morally refuted in current times, but that assumption had a brunt impact in which the world is still repairing today.
What is sociology? Before taking this class, I honestly had a very limited understanding of what sociology meant. However, because of the great diversity of people living in America, I have now realized how viewing the world with a sociological perspective can help me grasp the reality of many beliefs and practices in society today. Starting off with understanding the origin and purpose of sociology and transitioning into major topics such as race and ethnicity and education, I have gained new perspectives on how to observe the world around me.
To fully understand what Robert K. Merton contributed to sociology. We must understand who he was, what he believed in, why he believed what he did and finally, why he argued against other sociologists. In this essay, I will be talking about Self Fulfilling Prophecies, Middle Range Theories, Manifest and Latent Functions and the Strain between Culture and Social Structure. Robert Merton, is one of America’s most significant social scientists. He was born on the 4th of July 1910 and died 23rd February 2003, aged 92.