Essay Comparing Aristotle And Plato
Both Plato and his student, Aristotle, wrote about friendship and love around two thousand and three hundred years ago. Both “The Symposium” by Plato and “Nicomachean Ethics” by Aristotle are great classics about love and friendship. Plato believes that love is a necessity in everyone’s life as it helps us gain happiness and courage in life, or even in death; while Aristotle considers friendship as the most important thing in mankind. Although Plato’s and Aristotle’s ideology is slightly different, both of their works bring out the importance of “eudaimonia” – the final aim which we all should achieve: to do something that can bring us happiness. Aristotle classifies friendship into three different types according to different kinds of affection: …show more content…
Different from Aristotle, Plato defines love as “possessing the good self eternally”. Aristotle focuses more on one’s desire/ mindset towards a relationship while Plato focuses more on the foundation of love. Plato believes that love should not be established on outer beauty but inner beauty. Also, we should look for “immortality” in love. It is interesting that Plato portrays the relationship between men only, but not the typical relationship between men and women. It may because Plato wants to stress more on the “original nature/ value” of love: love that is far away from physical desire (i.e. sex/ impressions towards one’s physical body). We should appreciate one’s spirit according to Plato. We love each other because we share the similar, or same values. Plato’s ideology can be applied in our daily lives: When we are making new friends, or choosing partners; we will see if we can get along with each other well. This can be examined through the conversations, or via the mutual interests between the two persons. If two share the same or similar values and interests, it is more likely for these people to become friends or couples since they can get along with each other. However, if you meet someone’s values or interests that are very different from yours, no matter how attractive or beautiful he/ she is, you will not be friend with that person because one’s “inner
Diotima Ladder Of Love Analysis
476 Words | 2 PagesSocrates learned from Diotima that love is a kind of neediness that can only be fully satisfied by a good, by a kind of happiness that is never fleeting, that is permanent – which is the form of beauty. For beings like us, who are mortal, this means that love looks to stretch out beyond ourselves, beyond our own life. A central part of love, an aspect of love itself, is some aspiration to live on beyond the bounds of our mortality – hence the intrinsic features of unchanging, absolute, and separate of which Diotima
Plato's Symposium And The Oppression Of Sappho
1343 Words | 6 PagesThe language in Plato’s symposium and the expression of Sappho’s poetry are similar in that they both deal with homoerotic love. Sappho, the only ancient Greek female author whose work survived, talks from the female point of observation, where as Plato’s work concentrates on the idea of love among males. In spite of the fact that both of their points of view are comparative in courses, for example, their thoughts of physical fascination and want, Plato’s work creates a better understanding of the nature of love then Sappho’s ideas. This understanding will be shown with three arguments and counter- arguments in order to demonstrate the dominance of Plato over Sappho. It will than be concluded with an overview of the main idea and a recap of the three arguments made for Plato.
Analyzing Pausanias Speech About Love In The Symposium
594 Words | 3 PagesAll of the speakers speeches about love in the Symposium are important because they each have a unique idea to contribute about what is love and the idea of love. One of the speakers, Pausanias goes after Phaedrus’ speech. When it is his turn to speak he present his speech about love as not a single thing and therefore we shouldn’t praise it since there is more than one. Pausanias states that there are two kinds of love, he claims that since “there are two kinds of Aphrodite, there must also be two loves” (Symposium 13). The first Aphrodite is called Uranian or Heavenly Aphrodite since she is the daughter of Uranus, she is the oldest and has no mother.
Alcibiades Speech On Ladder Of Love
1745 Words | 7 PagesMinh Nguyen. Forms of Love. First rotation essay. Seminar leader: Marcella Perrett. 28-2-2015 Question :1.
Agathon's Symposium Speech Analysis
700 Words | 3 PagesThe various ideologies of love mentioned by speakers in Plato’s Symposium portrayed the social and cultural aspect of ancient Greece. In the text, there were series of speeches given by Phaedrus, Pausanias, Eryximachus, Aristophanes, Socrates, and Agathon about the idea of love, specifically the effect and nature of Eros. Within the speakers, Agathon’s speech was exceptional in that his speech shifted the focus of the audience from effect of Eros on people, to the nature and gifts from the Eros. Despite Agathon’s exceptional remarks about Eros, Socrates challenged Agathon’s characterization of Eros through utilization of Socratic Method.
Always Outnumbered Always Outgunned Analysis
620 Words | 3 PagesThis relationship was based upon total compassion and love. Socrates was there in his Right’s last moments. He proved to be a loyal friend giving his own, fairly limited, wealth to better Right’s standard of living. This male relationship is different from the other two, in that it has much more vulnerability. Rather than Socrates serving as a mentor or challenger, he is serving as Right’s equal.
Analyzing Diotima's Speech
325 Words | 2 PagesIn the speech of Diotima, she questions Socrates way of looking at love, Socrates said that love was something beautiful and good. Diotima describes love as needing happiness in order to have that love fulfilled; She thinks that happiness comes when one has beautiful and good things around them. Diotima describes love at the beginning of her speech, she says love was born when Aphrodite was born, Diotima also says that love is hardship and overcoming that hardship is what brings happiness to ones life. Love is described as a person, a person who has needs and desires, a person who is smart and always on the look out for opportunities. She always describes Love or Eros as being neither mortal or immortal, Love or as it is personified is the
Essay On Symposium And Lysistrata
978 Words | 4 PagesThe union of both sexes is a notable metaphor in both “Symposium” and “Lysistrata”; however, the nature of the love between the sexes draws a distinction between both works. In Symposium, Aristophanes described how both sexes were so powerful when united; and when they were separated, human beings still strived to be united once more by any means. On the other hand, in Lysistrata the characters were already married and united; however, women found their true strength when they started a psychological war on their men. Even though both works drew the readers’ attention to the need for love, Symposium emphasizes the union of sexes in a way that the characters in Lysistrata will never reach; where love is not only about sex and physical attraction, but it’s also about a healthy relationship occupied with affection and caring.
Clancy Merton The Symposium Summary
919 Words | 4 PagesHis past experiences has led him to believe that love should be masked by lies that in a sense it should the truth should be a voluntary definition behind love. In Plato’s Symposium, Aristophanes’ delivers a speech about his experiences of have loved or being in love. Aristophanes’ speech captures how powerful the feeling of love, that since birth love has condition our lives involuntary and will remain so. Love to Aristophanes’ is a form of completion that a lucky couple receives once the meet each other. This completion is empowered by an enormous amount of love, intimacy, and affection that neither bonds can be separated.
Thucydides And Plato: A Comparative Analysis
800 Words | 4 PagesThucydides and Plato have a clear set boundary in their writings as to what type of assertion they are fabricating. Thucydides sets a very narrow view with his piece of The Peloponnesian War that holds more weight in solid evidence of what a “good life” is demonstrated as. Plato, on the other hand, has several writings that go into depth of weighing what someone’s soul ought to have within itself. The statement of Thucydides making empirical claims, with Plato making normative claims, is supported with evidence in their respected works.
Role Of Love In Thucydides History Of The Peloponnesian War
234 Words | 1 PagesMany see love as a positive quality and for the most part it is. It gives us compassion for our fellow man, allows us to bond with each other, and care for our families. But it also has self-destructive properties too. In Thucydides History of the Peloponnesian War, the Athenians feel a really strong patriotism to their city and empire.
Qualitative Approach
818 Words | 4 PagesThis essay’s aims are to evaluate the contribution of a qualitative approach to friendship. I will discuss how different approaches studying friendship have been developed and how the findings influenced our understanding of friendships. Also, my focus will be on the benefits of quantitative and qualitative approaches and the limits of using qualitative methods for understanding friendship. In this paper, I will focus on two major
The Role Of Friendship In Plato's Symposium
1163 Words | 5 PagesThis paper uses the text 'Plato Symposium' in the discussion of the Aristotelian notion of friendship, exploration of the different types of friendship, exploration of complete and incomplete friendship and insight on how virtuous actions and
Love In The Aeneid
1684 Words | 7 PagesLove in this sense is obtained through familial love, because love discusses the sense of loyalty and family, and of respect. Love for Aeneas is supposed to be visual, “But now, when I had reached my father’s threshold, Anchises’ ancient house, our home-and I longed so to carry him to the high mountains and sought him first-he will not let his life be drawn after Troy has fallen,” (Virgil, Aeneid 2.857-860). Aeneas’ care for his father demonstrates similarities between romantic and familial love. Romantic love is obtained by being truthful and passionate. While
Plato And Aristotle And Plato's Power And Authority
1212 Words | 5 Pages1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.
More about Essay Comparing Aristotle And Plato
Diotima Ladder Of Love Analysis
476 Words | 2 PagesPlato's Symposium And The Oppression Of Sappho
1343 Words | 6 PagesAnalyzing Pausanias Speech About Love In The Symposium
594 Words | 3 PagesAlcibiades Speech On Ladder Of Love
1745 Words | 7 PagesAgathon's Symposium Speech Analysis
700 Words | 3 PagesAlways Outnumbered Always Outgunned Analysis
620 Words | 3 PagesAnalyzing Diotima's Speech
325 Words | 2 PagesEssay On Symposium And Lysistrata
978 Words | 4 PagesClancy Merton The Symposium Summary
919 Words | 4 PagesThucydides And Plato: A Comparative Analysis
800 Words | 4 PagesRole Of Love In Thucydides History Of The Peloponnesian War
234 Words | 1 PagesQualitative Approach
818 Words | 4 PagesThe Role Of Friendship In Plato's Symposium
1163 Words | 5 PagesLove In The Aeneid
1684 Words | 7 PagesPlato And Aristotle And Plato's Power And Authority
1212 Words | 5 Pages