According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Literary theory" is the body of ideas and methods we use in the practical reading of literature. By referring to literary theory, we not only study the works of literature but also the theories that support the various meanings of literature itself. Literary theory is the descriptive principles and tools used consistently to help writers understand literature and help readers follow along. Most, if not all, literary interpretation capitalizes on the basis, in theory, to help shape the different methods to critical analyzes. A literary theory also helps to develop the relationship between an author and their work; literary theory can focus on an extensive body of work, from class, race, …show more content…
"In every civil society, there is one group that has the greatest strength, and it can and always does set down the laws in the terms suitable to it. Whatever the character of this class, the city 's way of life will be determined by it" (p350). The Republic enhances Plato 's idea of a perfect or utopian, idealistic society. He also talks about the three of the four cardinal virtues that are required for a perfect society; temperance or self-control, wisdom, justice, and courage. Without these virtues, he believes that a good life could not be obtained. In The Republic, Plato also discussed two different forms of morality; the instrumental theory of morality and the functionalist theory of morality. Within the first form, he states that consequences of one 's action will determine if the action is wrong or right. But in contrast, he argues that this wasn 't correct, and the second form was. In the second form, he believes that everyone and everything has a purpose and that one 's action is morally right or wrong depending on the effect of that purpose. Today as I study Plato 's work, I 'm learning from his philosophies and the impact it has on his …show more content…
In the poem, "No, Plato, No", there is a shift of theme and focus. Unlike Plato, Auden wrote from the perspective of humanity and what they were facing and not from the perspective of the elites. In this poem, he took into account the importance of death through the symbolic meaning of his five senses and challenges Plato 's literary theory of a "perfect society" and the absence of humor unless align with the cardinal virtues of what makes a perfect society. "No, God has placed me exactly where I 'd have chosen to be, the sublunar world is such fun" (9-11), Auden 's use of sarcasm in this stanza correspond with Plato 's literary theory of being rational and unfeeling. There we can see where Auden made the correlation of being open to admit that the world is not so great and those that are here, are here for a reason and should find their greater caller instead of being fixated on controlling. Plato believes that poems are to not be imitated and should be banished from the hypothetical, ideal city and denied poetry the access to truth. He also believes artists of poets are ignorant of the things they imitate and choose to talk about and because poetry addresses itself to the lowest level of mankind in which he will never find truth towards reality. However, if poetry makes "a defense for herself in lyrical or some
the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame
In the Republic, Plato gives an extensive theory of justice. Three classes exist, rulers (legislators/deliberates), auxilaries (enforcers), and producers. What God has mixed into one's own soul decides, whether it is gold, silver, or iron/bronze, decides what class one belong's in. Each one of these classes has the potential to best develop a
Frustrated by Socrates lack of a clear, precise definition of justice and his constant quarrel with others over their opinion of justice, Thrasymachus claims he has an explanation of justice “that is different from all these and better than any of them” (337c). Responding sarcastically, Socrates instructs Thrasymachus to share his definition of what he believes justice to be since he is a “wise fellow” (337b). Socrates analyzes each premise of Thrasymachus claim of justice and in the end provides many argumentations as to what he believes justice to be. Specifically, Socrates functionality argument challenges Thrasymachus’ claim of justice the best; however, editing the third premise of Socrates’ functionality argument can make his argument more sound, ultimately, refuting Thrasymachus’ claim of justice and
Persuasion from ethos establishes the speaker 's or writer 's good character. As you saw in the opening of Plato 's Phaedrus, the Greeks established a sense of ethos by a family 's reputation in the community. Our current culture in many ways denies us the use of family ethos as sons and daughters must move out of the community to find jobs or parents feel they must sell the family home to join a retirement community apart from the community of their lives ' works. The appeal from a person 's acknowledged life contributions within a community has moved from the stability of the family hearth to the mobility of the shiny car. Without the ethos of the good name and handshake, current forms of cultural ethos often fall to puffed-up resumes and other papers.
Plato contests this view on justice because he believes doing harm to anyone would be an injustice. This theory leads to their conclusion the just man is one who is useful. Thrasymachus refers to justice in an egoistical manner, saying “justice is in the interest of the stronger” (The Republic, Book I). He believes injustice is virtuous and wise and justice is vice and ignorance, but Socrates disagrees with this statement as believes the opposing view. As a result of continual rebuttals against their arguments,
Plato regarded justice as the true principle of social life. Plato in his day found a lot of evil in society. He saw unrighteousness rampant and injustice enthroned.
I believe that Plato believes that people are inherently good and they will do what is morally right and just for society. They will earn their right to power and ensure fairness for all to prevent the tyrants from trying to take control. Plato mentions three main arguments regarding
Socrates is quoted as stating, “An unexamined life is a life not worth living” (38 a). Socrates was a founding figure of western philosophy, and a stable for many ideas. He lived in Athens, Greece teaching his students, like Plato, questioning politics, ethical choices, and many other things in Greek society. In the Trial and death of Socrates: Four Dialogues by Plato, it explores the abstract questioning Socrates had towards many of the normal social properties, which led to his trial, resulting in his death. The most important aspects discussed in the dialogues is the questioning of what is pious and impious, what it means to be wise, and good life.
Plato claims that in order to maintain a harmonious polis, the people must accept their position as they were born to be by Mother Nature. Only those born with a gold heart will be rulers and they will look over those born craftsmen, farmers who have copper hearts and auxiliaries who have
If we fail to acknowledge our hubris at the highest level, all of our society will suffer. We have given up our ability to evaluate life in favor of something far easier. For example, we choose to elect government officials who then act as tokens of our own values. This is the case in all republics be it Ancient Greece or the United States. By doing this we secure our fate and deny life itself.
Plato’s republic aims to describe a just state, and in turn a just individual consistently throughout the text. By analogising the justice of the state and the justice of the individual, Plato attempts to demonstrate that a just society will breed just individuals. However, there are certain loop holes within his thought process that can lead one to wonder whether or not his ideas are pragmatic, and could function within a real societal structure- and if human beings given their inherently selfish nature, can adopt the traits necessary in order to achieve justice and the ideal state described in the Republic. Plato described the human soul as a “tripartite soul” where three main qualities seen in the human being, will also be reflected in the three classes of the ideal state. Reason is the highest of the three main qualities, and it forms the class of rulers and guardians.
1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.
In Plato’s Republic, Socrates comes to the conclusion that we need to have a strong just society that is in the right order. In Books IV, V, and VI, Socrates explains that every society needs to be built on justice, everyone needs to have an occupation, and what a male and female household should look like. These are my prerequisites to what I consider essential to create a just society. Because without these qualities in an established society, you can hurt an entire civilization. And to Socrates argument, with an ideal king will come forms of co-operated citizens of a city.
Was Plato a Feminist? Plato was one of the only few philosophers from the ancient Greeks who believes the modern feminists’ view of men and women being equal in the society. Throughout the history, many people consider him as “the first feminist” and use his writings and dialogues as the support for the feminist movement. Plato asserts his belief in Book V of the Republic that jobs and responsibilities should be distributed by the person’s nature instead of neither the gender nor the appearance in an ideal state. The main argument of his belief is very similar to what feminist movements are proposing, which that the gender and biological differences should not determine the role of women in the society.
Guy de Maupassant (1850-1893), is a French author of the naturalistic school who is regarded as the greatest short story writer. Though he didn 't originate the short story genre, he promoted it. Maupassant was a prolific writer, between 1880 and 1890 he wrote around three hundred short stories. He was a master of his works and many of his famous works were associated with caustic endings.