In The Republic, Plato wrote about the dream world of education. In his vision, every child can start school life in the same way. Over time and through certain tests, they are proven feasible to proceed to a higher level separated from those who seem to need to work harder to be successful. They were selected, namely those who are eligible to continue their education, and methodological forged slowly until eventually will bring a new group left and actually qualified to be able to lead society. Those who are outside the selected community can then be directed to fill the social positions in society.
Plato 's dream was never realized because it is almost impossible to make all educational institutions to provide education to students with exactly the same. Nevertheless, Plato is then developed and affect the mindset of education providers thereafter.
One thing that seems then became general understanding around the world is that education is a good thing, it is important, and should be pursued by everyone. The motivation underlying the importance of education can vary. A person can pursue education because it felt he needed it, or because you want to change the status and social conditions, or simply want to see their children can pursue the dream of a better future for themselves, or perhaps a mix of all the motivation.
…show more content…
In other words, we can say that the higher education including Quasi-public goods (because it has a mix of properties of public goods and private goods). Thus, the paradigm that must be used is that higher education should continue to be treated as public goods, because of the properties of its private goods only on the basis of the limitations of the conditions or terms that are forced to
(616) Higher education is equal to welfare goods an example being health care. Diversification and expansion are the two differences in a higher education and welfare goods. The main thing when considering higher education and welfare goods is the consumers “choice”. Education doesn’t have as much of an importance than other things in society do. Another thing is the well-being and the demands of personal autonomy.
Similar to the structure and order of the aging process in Anthem’s society, the education system presented is also very organized. At five years old, every boy goes to live at the Home of the Students until he reached the age of fifteen. During these 10 years, they gain a variety of knowledge taught to them by Teachers that “had been appointed by the Councils”, including information about the earth and their society’s history (22). Such an amount of time and energy is put into their educations, despite the fact that their lives would vary from that point on depending on their jobs. This suggests that the community values education, but only the education that they want to provide the citizens because the citizens should only have knowledge of certain things.
The ideal city requires lying in order to reach the ideal point of a city. The ideal city must keep its people just. It is argued in The Republic that “each one must practice one of the functions in the city, that one for which his nature made him naturally fit.” (4, 433 a).
Persuasion from ethos establishes the speaker 's or writer 's good character. As you saw in the opening of Plato 's Phaedrus, the Greeks established a sense of ethos by a family 's reputation in the community. Our current culture in many ways denies us the use of family ethos as sons and daughters must move out of the community to find jobs or parents feel they must sell the family home to join a retirement community apart from the community of their lives ' works. The appeal from a person 's acknowledged life contributions within a community has moved from the stability of the family hearth to the mobility of the shiny car. Without the ethos of the good name and handshake, current forms of cultural ethos often fall to puffed-up resumes and other papers.
Through many of Plato’s works, such as the Republic, the Gorgias, and the Apology, the person that Socrates was and his personality shine through in his dialogue. Socrates was a man who asked many questions and always pushed not only his students but the whole city of Athens to look for more than just physical things. Many people claim, that Socrates went about teaching in the wrong way and that he is an arrogant fool and not an extremely wise person. However, I disagree with this claim. I believe that Socrates was a man who looked beyond the physical world and strived to gain as much knowledge as he could through asking questions and continuing to learn from others and in turn teach others, thus making him wise and striving to live the best life.
Plato's Republic is centered on one simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? This is something that Socrates addresses both in terms of political communities and the individual person. Plato argues that being just is advantageous to the individual independent of any societal benefits that the individual may incur in virtue of being just. I feel as if Plato’s argument is problematic. There are not enough compelling reasons to make this argument.
According to a statement of Aaron Bady, a journalist, regarding education in various universities, he stated that “Public education should be free. If it isn't free, it isn't public education.” The
Leah Martin Mrs.McKenna English /5th period 13 May 2016 Final Copy Our family can only eat whatever we grow on a small plot of land located a short way from our house. We have no other form of income so if we are unable to pick anything to eat from the land we go without food on that day. This happens a lot and we regularly go several days without any food at all. When we do pick vegetables from the land it’s very rarely enough for the whole family to be fed so my husband
Socrates started his life as an average Athen citizen. His parents worked, making an honest living. But as Socrates grew up, he began to realize that his mind questioned things and wondered how come no one else questioned the same things or at least think about the answers to the questions that were not answered. So, as his mind kept wandering, he began to acknowledge the questions that were not answered and sought for those answers. He ended up believing and teaching things to other people, whether it went against the way the Athen government or not, he still continued his work.
According to Socrates perspective, the democracy of Athens was corrupt and even though they courts were made in such a way that everyone was judged fairly, it wasn’t such because there were no rules or principles set forth. When a person was brought to court in the Athenian court and the person spoke against the jurors or offended them, he or she could be prosecuted based on that. In summary, judgment was passed based on emotion rather than on justice. In the Apology, Socrates stated, “my present request seems a just one, for you to pay no attention to my manner of speech-
1. I think one of the most important ideas that Plato expresses comes from Book VII of the Republic, in the Allegory of the Cave. It is an idea that states that the extent of our knowledge will usually only cover topics that we’ve had exposure in. Today, society’s access to information is abundant, but not everyone makes the decision to find that information. Thus, as a person grows up with the scope of their perception isolated in a certain environment (village, city, state, country, etc.), they may not be able to pull a good variety of influence and knowledge from areas outside their scope.
What is justice? This is the crucial question that Plato attempts to answer in his dialogue, The Republic. He conjures up an allegory that justice can be found in a person, and a person can represent a city. Thus, his entire dialogue focuses on this ‘just’ city and the mechanics of how the city would operate. His dialogue covers a myriad of topics about justice in addition to the human soul, politics, goodness and truth.
In The Republic, Plato writes about his thoughts on good, justice, and how we can achieve it. He starts off by stating that for human happiness and to live the best life philosopher-kings are needed. Not everyone can become a philosopher; certain people simply are non-philosophers also called lovers of sights and sounds. Plato makes the distinction between lovers of wisdom(philosophers) and lovers of sights and sounds clear using beauty as an example. Non-philosophers see ''fine tones and colours and forms and all the artificial products that are made out of them''(476b) but are unable to see or to understand absolute beauty.
In Plato’s Republic, Socrates comes to the conclusion that we need to have a strong just society that is in the right order. In Books IV, V, and VI, Socrates explains that every society needs to be built on justice, everyone needs to have an occupation, and what a male and female household should look like. These are my prerequisites to what I consider essential to create a just society. Because without these qualities in an established society, you can hurt an entire civilization. And to Socrates argument, with an ideal king will come forms of co-operated citizens of a city.
So, this essay will focus on evaluating arguments for and against free education in university. First of all, it is essential to assess arguments in favor of making university education free for all interested. First of all, in further, it will inspire more and more people to attend university and, doubtless, this will benefit society as it will lead to a more prolific as well as educated workforce. What is more, generally, researches show that those countries that