Slavery was an exceedingly frequent and common practice in ancient Roman times. Thus it is to be expected that it would have been implemented in many different aspects of the Roman culture including theatrical performances. An example of this is seen in the play Prisoners by Plautus, one of Rome’s most famous comedy playwrights. One item of significance that Plautus reveals to us in his play is the theme of relationships. There are many different kinds of relationships that take place within the play, however, he focuses particularly on master-slave relationships. We learn about the relationship between Tyndarus and his master Philocrates and Philocrates and Tyndarus and their new master Hegio. When thinking of a master-slave relationship, especially in recent history, it is not uncommon for one to think of a negative correlation, however, Plautus, in his play, proves to us that in antiquity, in some instances, master-slave …show more content…
Nearing the middle of the play we see Hegio, in a fit of rage, send Tyndarus to the mines to work himself to death as a means of punishment for lying. (pg. 83m) This is an examples of what may be considered ‘typical’ between and master and his slave. Still, although master-slave relationships are often linked with this form of negative connotation, Plautus, in my opinion, has shown that the relationships held between slave and master can be positive. He shows us in his play an excellent example of how a master and his slave can be involved in a relationship that exceeds just business and enters a friendship. Within the play there is evidence that slaves in antiquity were treated well. Ultimately, I am of the opinion that to be a slave in antiquity does not necessarily mean to be under the ownership of a cruel and brutal master, sometimes it can mean that your master is also your
Primary Source Essay Chapter 5 Reading 3 Roman Women Demonstrate against the Oppian Law (195 B.C.E) The source, Roman Women Demonstrate Against the Oppian Law, written by Livy, a Roman historian, offers a great deal of information into the history of the Roman culture. This document is a reorganized explanation of a debate that occurred in 195 B.C.E between Marcus Porcius Cato and Lucius Valerius over the repeal of the Oppian Law, which was written in Rome sometime between 59 BCE and 17 CE (130-206 years after the debate occurred). At this time in the Roman society, like much of the world, women were valued in the traditional roles of wives and mothers.
According to PBS, slavery played an important role in the Roman Society. Most slaves during the Roman Empire were foreigners and, unlike in modern times, Roman slavery was not based on race (“The Roman Empire in the First Century: Slaves & Freemen”). The life of a slave was quiet harsh. They were often whipped, branded or maltreated. Their masters could easily kill them for any reason, and would not get punished for it (“The Roman Empire in the First Century: Slaves & Freemen”).
In Terry Alford’s novel “Prince Among Slaves” there were many people that strived to bring Ibrahima back to Africa, during this time he also worked to free his children. The role of letter writing had an impact on the course of the book and each person connected the direction of Ibrahima’s journey. A former prince, Abd al-Rahman Ibrahima, was captured through an ambush due to his lost to the Hebohs and is now a slave (23).
This book brilliantly written by Plutarch has the common theme of Agis’ life,
This demonstrates how their power had no limits on how far they could go on treating someone badly, especially their slaves. They both take advantage of their power to get what they want, and to make someone’s life
In the context of the OED, servile is defined as “having or showing an excessive willingness to serve or please others”, and “of or characteristics of a slave or slaves.” The word servile originated in late Middle English, from the Latin word servilis, from severus or “slave.” The widespread understanding of the word was “suitable for a slave or for the working class.” Pamphilia is saying, why she has to be slave to the list of things Amphilanthus wants. She would rather escape and seek refuge somewhere away from him.
However, this quote speaks directly to the idea of natal alienation in society. Natal alienation goes directly to the heart of the problem with the misunderstandings in the play. There is a sense of loss of ties between the both the ascending and descending generations in the play. This type of alienation from formal history, blood, and religion created a detachment from the culture and belief systems of the past. Therefore, the slave was used as the ultimate human “tool” such as to be as disposable as a wrench when no longer needed.
“Yes, sir, he gives me enough, such as it is.” The colonel, after ascertaining where the slave belonged, rode on; the man also went on about his business, not dreaming that he had been conversing with his master. He thought, said, and heard nothing more of the matter, until two or three weeks afterwards. The poor man was then informed by his overseer that, for having found fault with his master, he was now to be sold to a Georgia trader. He was immediately chained and handcuffed; and thus, without a moment’s warning, he was snatched away, and forever sundered, from his family and friends, by a hand more unrelenting than death.”
This is important because this means that no matter how small of how big a crime that you would have made, you would have been sent away from your homeland to be tortured and beaten and worked for the rest of your life without any mercy. The next important part of the passage is where Barbot said that only the higher ranked officials (kings, rich men, and merchants) were usually the ones that would sell the slaves and not the “inferior sort of blacks”. This reason is important because it proves that if you were poor of of a different skin tone, you did not have the same abilities as would a rich person or a high ranked official and that you were looked down upon by the higher people. The last important thing from the text was how when the prisoners would be branded with a ho iron to let the owners know who was who, the women were still held with caution and would not be branded as hard. This is important because it shows that the traders still had some humanity left in them and would not have let the women be branded just as hard as the
One is familiar with Shakespeare’s tragedies such as “The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet”, “The Tragedy of Hamlet” and so forth. Shakespeare’s tragedies have been known for centuries as a reflection of the societies in different eras which appealed to many until today. They express the darkness that lies within the human’s soul and mind. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” and “The Tragedy of Macbeth” are both remarkable works of Shakespeare’s that although they are of different plots, they both share indistinguishable characteristics and themes such as a tragic hero, tragic flaw and hero’s downfall. It had been noted that all Shakespearean tragedies reflect a flaw in the main character or a conflict with an overpowering force that can be observed in the characteristics of Julius Caesar’s, Brutus’s, and Macbeth’s.
Sophocles’ Electra is a well-known Greek tragedy, set place at Mycenae after the Trojan wars. In the tragedy Electra plays one of the most important roles among the Chorus. The Chorus often sympathises with Electra and also helps the reader (or the audience considering it was written as a play) to understand the events better. The Chorus shares emotions with Electra, such as her grief and frustration, or her joy upon the return of Osteres. In my essay I will discuss the importance of the Chorus and how to the presence of the Chorus guides the audience.
This guest-host relationship would be considered the ‘ideal’ in Ancient Greece. Examples of ‘bad’ xenia would be the relations between Polyphemus and Odyssues and the Suitors in Odysseus’
This essay will be explaining the ways in which tyranny was a good thing for Greek states across the Mediterranean during the 6th, 5th, and 4th centuries BC. In the first instance, What tyranny is and how some of the Greek States were, in general, before tyranny will be explained. Additionally, examples of two tyrants from two different locations will be discussed. Finally, why and how tyranny came to be seen as a bad thing will be discussed. Tyranny
For Shakespeare’s plays to contain enduring ideas, it must illustrate concepts that still remain relevant today, in modern society. Shakespeare utilises his tragic play Othello, to make an important social commentary on the common gender stereotypes. During early modern England, Shakespeare had to comply to the strict social expectations where women were viewed as tools, platonic and mellow, and where men were displayed as masculine, powerful, tempered, violent and manipulative. As distinct as this context is to the 21st century, the play exposes how women were victimised by the men who hold primary power in the community in which they compelled women to conform to the ideal world of a perfect wife or confront an appalling destiny for challenging the system. Moreover, Shakespeare utilises the main antagonist, Iago, to portray how men are desperate to achieve what they want and to indirectly fulfil the stereotype of masculinity and power through manipulation.
Slavery had a great effect not only on Ancient Greece, some saying slaves were the necessity to build the civilization entirely, but also had an effect on other countries throughout history obtaining slavery. Greek slavery has contributed a variety of scholarly debate, precisely regarding Aristotle’s viewpoint on his theory of slavery being natural. The theory of natural slavery has produced questions of whether or not Aristotle has contradicted himself making his evidence uncertain. This essay will be examining and analysing the evidence that Aristotle provides in regards to his theory of natural slavery. It will be questioning if he produces a straightforward view regarding his beliefs of natural slaves and the abilities they possess.