Of all the rulers in Plutarch’s Lives, Numa Pompilus was the one king who expressed characteristics of a true ruler. Numa displayed morality known by all the people in Rome. He was a peacemaker, which brought about a prosperous and joyful kingdom. Numa not only built on top of Romulus’s work to start a strong and powerful kingdom. Above all the rulers in Plutarch’s Lives, Numa Pompilus showed morality, good judgment, and self-sacrifice. Numa became king, not for his own benefit, but for that of the people and the gods. When the elders of Rome came to request Numa to accept the throne, he rejected their petition. They soon realized that he would require more vigorous persuasion than they originally intended. Still, when Numa would not affirmatively respond, his father pulled him aside, and said, “Though you neither desire riches, being content with what you have, nor court the fame of authority, as having …show more content…
After Numa came into rule, they both shared something in common: their love for their wise king and their faith. Numa destroyed the separation of the two nations so they would cease to fight over who was Roman and who was a Sabine. He accomplished this by making trades, so instead of being labeled as Roman or a Sabine they were called blacksmith, cobbler, shoe polisher, and so on. This was so his people would be busy with a guild and not with war. Romulas on the other hand, had decided to steal women from the nearby Sabine kingdom to profit his kingdom and disrupt the peace with his foolish plan. Instead of encouraging peace he started another heated war. Before Numa ruled Rome, the people where held together by war. They only stuck together so they could conquer other nations. However, Numa held them together by faith. Because of this peaceful society Numa held the Romans together in peace for 43 years. Numa unified them by giving them faith and busying their hands with productive
Foreign Invaders caused quite a ruckus in the Roman Empire. It was too large of an empire to be protected, and natural borders weren't doing them much justice. There weren't enough legionnaires to guard frontier boundaries, likewise, the legions weakened. The legionnaires were so concerned with their salaries and control of the throne, they lost focus of their job: to protect Rome. Germanic tribes began to invade Rome and they hit their weak spot.
'Assess the significance of Pompey's early military and political career' Pompey's early political and military career were extremely significant and a leading factor to his success in the future positions he held in his time. He was born into both the political and military world, due to his father, Strabo, being in a high political position, eventually becoming consul. His father also impacted his military knowledge, being in command of his son for two years. At a young age, 23, Pompey was already of a high position in the military, and leading armies alongside Sulla, an older Roman consul. This is significant as he was extremely under aged for the position of praetor, however was still granted these powers, nevertheless, despite not holding
Why Americans Would Benefit from Reading Plutarch’s Roman Lives. A recent article by Rebecca Burgess and Hugh Liebert from the Wall Street Journal argues that Americans would benefit from reading Plutarch. The authors give very little evidence to support their case. Plutarch’s Roman Lives could be beneficial for not only Americans, but most of the population to read.
Although Alexander Severus is commonly known for his deficiency in military tactics, we should also remember him for all the good he brought to Roman citizens. He was able to reduce tax and do as the Romans wanted. It is important that we learn about these people who lived thousands of years ago, so that they will be remembered for many more
It reached its peak of material and cultural grandeur under Ptolemy II Philadelphus, who ruled from 285 to 246. After his death, the empire entered a long period of war and constitutional dispute that ended when Egypt became the province of the Roman Empire in 30 BC. Alexander the Great is, amiably, the most famous figure in world history. Alexander's acquisition’s reflected not only his desire for dominance, but also his belief that East and West could be united under one system of government and become a way of life.
Being the ruler of all even though he didn’t even realize how big that role is because no one has been emperor long enough to show how to do things
Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar were two highly important men in the history of the world. In Greek and Roman Lives, the historian Lucius Mestrius Plutarchus, better known as just Plutarch, wrote about the lives of these two great men. He wrote of how their surroundings and the people around them influenced them, and how that affected their success in their plans to reach some form of eternal glory in their desire to become greater than those who came before them. They were both extremely ambitious, quick to fight, and careless of danger on the path to glory.
Alexander the Great, although a great leader, was selfish, power hungry, and heartless. He came to power when his father died. He expanded his empire through blood and warfare. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was reckless and he left his kingdom without a ruler.
From the beginning of his rule in 27 B.C., peace reigned throughout the empire called the Pax Romana, or Roman Peace. Augustus was Rome’s most stable and powerful emperor and sustained Rome by keeping peace and glorifying the empire as well. Augustus stabilized the frontier of Rome which caused the Pax Romana. This two-hundred year period saw unprecedented peace and economic prosperity throughout the empire, which spanned from England in the north, to Morocco in the south and Iraq in the east.1 The population of the vast empire thrived to seventy-million people. The empire was big enough and was well-managed by Augustus’s system of government.
Firstly, the issue noted above that we do not know the order of the Parallel Lives, makes interpretation difficult because we therefore can’t understand how Plutarch’s themes developed and interacted with each other throughout the entire series. This is an issue in Life of Marius because of how singularly negative Plutarch is about Marius, to the point where it has been noted as his most critical work on any character. Secondly, the genre of biography itself and its focus on character rather than fact, inherently suggests that Plutarch may exaggerate some events and omit others, in order to communicate his lessons on morality. For example, Plutarch is far more descriptive of political events in which Marius can be portrayed as immoral and ambitious. However, he says little on the political platform on which Marius ran for consulship, and downplays the political acumen Marius, as a novus homo, or even if he had been nobilis, must have had to gain consulship for 6 straight years.
His leadership was not to be a monarchy, which the Romans equated to slavery, but instead a leader of the people. Octavian managed to secure his power by doing what was best for the state. Octavian believed that the state was responsible for promoting a good life for its citizens and thus initiated many reforms to better the state and, therefore, the lives of the people. When Aristides gained citizenship he praised Rome stating, “You have divided into two parts all men throughout your empire... everywhere giving citizenship to all those who are more accomplished, noble, and powerful, even as they retain their nativeborn identities, while the rest you have made subjects and the governed.” With faith restored in the state, and reason once again to be loyal, Rome continued to expand its
At only nineteen, he had his own army and freed the Republic and made himself ruler. He executed many wars throughout his lifetime and “when victorious [he] spared all citizens who sought pardon.” He did this because he wasn’t seeking to kill innocent people. He wanted to have a strong, peaceful empire. His victories allowed him to restore peace to Gallic and Spanish provinces and also to the Alps, which no other roman had been able to do.
Two million square kilometers of land, fifty-five thousand miles of roads, and sixty-five million people, this was Rome at its height under “Pax Romana”. “Pax Romana” or the Roman Peace was a period of relative order and security which lasted for two hundred years and beginning with the reign of Augustus. The Roman Peace had a significant impact on the political, economic and social systems of the Roman Empire. On the 14th of March, 44 BCE, Julius Caesar is assassinated, sending the Roman Empire into chaos and forever changing the political landscape.
Despite Rome renewed the alliance with the Latins they did not entertain their hope as Rome could become their leader
Oedipus the King is one of the most ironic plays ever written. Sophocles, the author, is a famous philosopher of the ancient times The Play is about Oedipus, the king of Thebes, who kills his father and marries his mother. An oracle warned Laius, the king of Thebes prior to Oedipus, that his son would murder him. Accordingly, when his wife, Jocasta, had a son, he exposed the baby by first pinning his ankles together. The infant, who was adopted by King Polybus of Corinth and his wife was then brought up as their very own.