A police officer protects and serves the public. In a way, they control order in a society. A police officer possesses courage, integrity, loyalty, trust, and passion. Many individuals that become police officers are affected by the stress of the job and adapt a police personality. A police personality is based upon the belief that police officers possess different characteristics from the public.
Law enforcement is known to abuse their power of authority. The type of violence that are done leads to death and injuries. Police officers need to be held for their accountability of their abuse. Police brutality is a problem to the public. The problem can be stopped by these three solutions: body cameras, investigation and different race.
A police officer is required to handle the situation with discretion by all means, but there might be times in which that could not be the best source. A police officer needs to quickly observe the mentality of the detainee because he or she may have mental issues. According to the article Police discretion and encounters with people experiencing mental illness it is stated that, “Mental health legislation in most jurisdictions outlines the responsibility of the police regarding the protection of people who are a threat to themselves or others. It has long been recognized, however, that these laws represent a framework that can be difficult to apply in specific situations (Godfredson, Ogloff, Thomas & Luebbers, 2015, Pg. 1393).” These are situations in which the officer needs to take a different choice in order to take over of the situation.
Regardless of the policing era, this principle still applies and is necessary for police department legitimacy. Peel’s second principle states the ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions (Dempsey & Forst, 2016). When the public and police form partnerships they design and implement police action plans that are tailored to the communities needs. Peel’s third principle is police must secure the willing cooperation of the public in voluntary observance of law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public (Dempsey & Forst, 2016). This principle is evident today by statutory laws that are passed to secure and protect the public from harm.
There are many pros and cons when it comes to the use of police force. The use of force is strictly a part of the job requirement of protecting and serving our community. It is the everyday battles that force police to make decisions that may seem a bit harsh at times. The use of force is only acceptable under certain circumstances and should only be used when absolutely needed. There are cases when civilians are saved by the use of police force, and there are cases when innocent people are hurt or even killed by the use of police force.
This research paper will analyze the importance of nonverbal communication within the field of law enforcement. The idea of this research is to show that nonverbal communication always exists between a police officer and a suspect. At first, it will be important to explain what is nonverbal communication, so a little introduction will explain where it is possible to find signs of nonverbal communication (for example the way someone stands or sits, his gestures and his facial expressions). Then, the goal will be to show the relation of authority between a suspect and a police officer, to know what is a real lie (S. MANN, A. VRIJ, R. BULL), and to detect lies even when there are almost no movements. In order to write this paper properly I will
He explains that we need to reform as a community not just as a police department. He gave strong statistics on crime levels to which his jurisdiction covered. As for the satisfaction in Melvin Russell’s speech, He proposed an understanding in the community towards law enforcement. He talks about how the world has made law enforcement very harsh and thick skinned. Throughout this portion of his speech, Russell has a very conversational tone of voice but yet very professional.
#PoliceThePolice is a call for accountability from the federal government against the misconduct of law enforcement officers. The Cato Institute defines police misconduct as “any action, on duty or off, by a person entrusted with police powers which would violate that trust to an extent that would cause those who entrusted the officer with said powers to reasonably question whether continuing that trust would expose the public safety to an unacceptable level of risk.” Misconduct can range from theft to sexual assault to brutality to raids to false arrest, but what enables officers to engage in these actions is that they believe that they are above the law and that they can get away with it. In a way, it’s true. Law enforcement officers are given specific powers by our government in order for them to do their jobs. Which is understandable, but when law enforcement officers are to get off of offenses or other officers look the other way to their misconduct, there is a problem.
What does Patrol do? Being that patrol officers are most commonly encountered by the public, their duties consist of responding to calls for service, resolving disputes, taking crime reports, making arrest, conducting traffic stops, and other crime prevention measures. Being that patrol officers have to know geographic areas well it is important that they are the first to arrive on the scene of any incident. As an officer it is also important that they take precaution measures to everything they do in the crime scene area; what such an officer does or fails to do at the scene can and will greatly influence the outcome of any investigation. As an active member in the community and a person who is in the field daily, he/she is often closest to potential crime and may have developed contacts who can provide certain information
2. What is the most critical function of auditing and how does the concept of expectation gap affect this function? The most critical function of an auditor is that they have to follow all the auditing standards and the performance of auditors in the prevention of fraud Audit expectation gap: The relevance of the role theory is that every individual in an organization has a part or role to play in fulfilling their job requirements. Roles also indicate specific forms of behaviors required by specific tasks to be performed The main beliefs are directly related to the internal auditor and the issue of fraud prevention. The model is expected to act within socially acquired rules which are the social expectations of the public from the auditor to prevent fraud.
Street level bureaucrats are police officers, teachers, social workers and others who interact with citizens. According to the video, street level bureaucrats are important to the citizens because whatever they get from the government is what the street level bureaucrats do for them. Their jobs are so complex because what they learn from in school or in training is different from what they would have to do when they are actually doing their job. They would have to take what they learned and apply it to the particular situation quickly without a lot of knowledge. Police officers are considered street level bureaucrats because they make the decisions that produce actual police policy as it affects citizens (pg.
The media should therefore try to get the right information from the police to help them to reveal the exact information to the nation. This way the community will feel obliged to inform the media of any information that might be of help to the community (Miller et al., 2014). 2 The police and the media can easily address crime in the community by cooperating with the members. The media should not only post the negative information but they should research and find the cause of the increased gangs. It is also important for the media to note that crime is everywhere and it is unfair to view Anonymous Community as one fool of criminals.
38 ). Section 25, part one in the CCC addresses how law enforcement officer are mandated and entitled to enforce the law, doing so they have to act justifiably and responsibly (Martins, 2016, p. 38). Section 25, part three in the CCC outlines how officers are to deadly or lethal force; this type of force is only mandated in situations where the law enforcement officer believes lethal force is necessary in order to safeguard one self or an other individual (Martins, 2016, p. 38-39). In conclusion, enforcement officials are mandated to use force in certain situations to regain control. What society fails to see is that officers can also be brought before the courts if they did not act on reasonable grounds and use “excessive force” (Martins, 2016, p. 43).
If you pay attention to the news, you have probably heard about police brutality. There are almost constant reports of police abusing their power and, consequently, injuring those that they are meant to protect. Police should not be required to wear body cameras while on duty! Why should they be monitored to make sure that they are properly doing their job? Why should they be expected maintain the same standards that they enforce on others?
Police were seen in many cities as corrupt, receiving bribes in order to ignore real crimes. Police were thought of as brutal, using excessive force against citizens, often in conjunction with fake charges and unlawful arrests. To the working class, they appeared as a tool of economic leaders to battle against laborers and the relatively new unions. A movement grew, advocating the professionalization of the police forces. Escobar (2003) mentions how professionalization meant enforcing, “high standards for entrance into the force, a rigorous training program, better pay for officers, and more modern equipment and administrative procedures.”(p.175) Reformists argued the position that law enforcement should be carried out impartially, removed from the influence of politicians that had been using police as a force to protect their own interests and attack anything that threatened those interests.