It was a right given to them by a case back in 1985, in which a person was killed by deadly force. Nevertheless, that is why sometimes police officers might get away with the killing of a citizen because there is not enough evidence that the use of force was not necessary. If these cameras are installed in officers uniforms the use of force will definitely decrease and will make the community feel safer and police officers gain more respect from the public. Finally, if the use of force is not necessary then a police officer can get suspend from the department after a judge has viewed the happenings of the case. The uses of cameras will not only make police officers use less force and the public feel safer, but it will also help the country become a safer place
Either way there needs to be something that can protect the public from police misconduct and also protect law enforcement from dealing with false accusations that can tarnish their reputation. That is why body worn cameras need to be mandatory for all police officers to wear because it protects the public and the police officers that are wearing them. A couple positive outcomes police officers wearing body cameras is how they can lower police officers misuse of authority and also lower false complaints against officers as well. These are two
Evidence 1 in the article By: Jay Stanley for the American Civil Liberties Union describes body cameras as “They are small clip on cameras or headsets.” (Stanley). Which means every officer should have one. It 's not like they are something that is going to be hard to work around or work with. Evidence 2 in an article By: PoliceOne staff they speak out by saying “Video is a great equalizer.” (Police staff) So many cops are planning on turning more towards them. This relates back because video truly is what happened you can 't change the video on the card when it comes out of the body camera and onto a computer to be played in front of everyone.
However, I believe that police officers should wear body cameras because it prevents excessive force and discrimination, allows to harness the technology, and is a tool for evidence gathering. First of all, some police officers think that body cameras could affect police moral and recruitment. However, it prevents excessive force and racial discrimination. When police officers are using body cameras they have on mind the recording, so they will be conscious to behave; as a result, the excessive force and discrimination could decrease. As the author mentions that Researchers “found that officers who wore cameras used force less often…” (3).
“I do not believe that all police officers are bad, nor do I believe that most are bad. But there must be a transparent, impartial, and fair system to judge those that engage in criminal or unethical acts.”- Al Sharpton In my opinion, all police officers need to have body cameras on ,while they are on-duty. We’ll be discussing the pros, cons, and price of policemen wearing body cameras. To begin with, we’ll discuss the benefits we could reap from cameras. In many studies, they’ve been found to decrease violence, not just from the officers wearing them, but also from the civilians.
Furthermore, when information sharing is increased it allows greater access to data on sex offenders. This would help law enforcement to promote justice by having equal access to information. However, at this stage there is not enough research to show to what extent this will impact the justice system’s efficiency. Members of the public can protect themselves Proponents for sex offender registers claim that they provide an effective preventative tool because, if people know where offenders reside, those in the community can protect themselves from the risk that sex offender pose. The supposition is that by knowing a sex offender resides in your community, the community can take steps to prevent being victimised.
Officers often use their authority in ways that are unexplained. They act based on their instinct and not necessarily what is morally correct. Based on Herman’s article, “Police officers with body cameras are as likely to use force as those who don’t have them”. Body cameras seem to not have any different impact on force says management. Over the years Police Officers reiterate that they are the law, but their actions seem to be above the law.
Very good discussion Thomas, I also concur that the purpose of 'ban the box ' is to give an ex-offender a better shot at going farther in You have provided many valid points regarding the use of body cameras by police officers. Indeed that the utilization of body cameras by officers do provide transparency and accountability towards potential and suspect individual in question to include officers ' conduct. The officers must also use good judgment and with plenty of discretion when executing their legal authority to use such device. Like you also mentioned, some witnesses would be reluctant in assisting with the investigation, if they know that video cameras could potentially be release to the public that could result in retribution.
With technology advancing, we are able to use technology to monitor and examine. As the encounters with officers that may result in violent outbursts, civilians are concerned with police brutality and their rights. Body-worn video video devices as tools can be an insurance for the compliance of the fourth amendment. The sole reason for favor of police body cams are due to the unbiased record of what exactly occurred during an officer 's interaction. With this, testimonies cannot be distorted since there would be a new way to assert evidence.
Unfortunately, there are cases where some people went to jail and weren’t necessarily suppose to go to jail. But who truly knew if the officers or witness were telling the truth about the incident? That’s why body cameras should be mandatory for all police officers. It will force the suspects to not lie and enable the judge to have direct evidence in court, rather than comparing both stories and trying to put two and two together. Body cameras are useful devices that show what exactly happened moments before the crime or accident took place.