Leadership Styles and Their Results
Introduction
Within the discussion, we are asked to review the two leaders and their leadership styles. Then identify which leadership style was used in both scenarios briefing to their officers, and compare and contrast those styles. Then explain if one style was better than the other for the scenario presented. We will also have to explain which leaders’ communication style was more motivating to their officers, and the leadership style that could result in the best officer outcome to the new program and why? Then explain what could be the inadvertent consequence of the less desirable approach?
The leadership style used, the major theories associated with the two leadership styles, compare and contrast
…show more content…
This style is considered by police leaders the one to use when they are looking to motivate, “offer intellectual stimulation and appeal to followers’ moral values, set vision, and let the leader display their desire to make a positive connection to their subordinates” (Campbell, & Kodz, 2011, p.3), which could be viewed as an effective way for a leader to act with their officers. Vito, Higgins, & Denney, (2014) also agree that transformational leaders also makes provisions for influence and power in the leadership process, but to make sure the power and influence remain within this theory, we must also incorporate four physiognomies: inspiration, intellectual stimulation, magnetism, and individual consideration. Once these are added to a leader, this would create a better theory for a police leader to use and apply to their …show more content…
References
Campbell, I & Kodz, J. (2011) p.3. What makes great police leadership? Retrieved from http://whatworks.college.police.uk/Research/Documents/Great_Police_Leader_REA.pdf
Leadership Theories and Studies. Retrieved from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Int-Loc/Leadership-Theories-and-Studies.html
Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Substitutes for Leadership Theory: Implications for University Faculty. Retrieved from http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/ Lunenburg,%20Fred%20C.%20Substitutes%20for%20Leadership%20Theory%20FOCUS%20V4%20N1%202010.pdf
Sarver, M. B., & Miller, H. (2014). Police chief leadership: Styles and effectiveness. Policing, 37(1), 126-143. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/ 1507744492?accountid=27965
Vito, G. F., Higgins, G. E., & Denney, A. S. (2014). Transactional and transformational leadership. Policing, 37(4), 809. Retrieved from
There are four main executive styles that police executives employ in the execution of their roles. They include the administrator, the top cop, the politician, and the statesman. All these executive styles are dependent upon the particular external and internal roles and their time allocation for these responsibilities. In the two cases studies, both the new chief executives employ different executive styles in their attempts to reform their police departments. Captain Ed Davis employs the statesman style in running the Lowell Police Department (LPD) while Chief Ken Fortier uses the administrator style in his governance of the Riverside Police Department (RPD) which bear certain similarities and differences.
The great Criminal Justice system in this country is comprised of a great many number of agencies that can operate both dependent or independent of each other. However, within each larger agency are divisions that provide supporting roles and sections that each agency is reliant on in order to run smoothly and accomplish its larger goals. The purpose of this assessment is to examine how the City of San Diego Human Resource (HR) section manages to accomplish its goals, while enabling the San Diego Police Department (SDPD) with high quality men and women, to achieve its objectives. In studying how, a single section can influence an entire department, one can better understand the inner workings of a large agency intended to provide a needed service
Also, both styles expressed what is necessary for police improvement. Furthermore, although, the effect on external relations is harder to predict in top cop, both styles will experience a certain degree of backlash if they exclude the external sources and interfere with the relationships of the officers and the community. The two styles differ for the reasons the administrator emphasizes the managing aspect s and manifestations of that role; but, top cop focuses more on leading than on managing. The administrator concentrates on the police organization (planning, organizing, staffing, directing, and controlling), while the top cop is heavily involved in police operation (giving out orders and being in the spotlight on the more high profile investigations). Top cops are more likely than administrators to be liked and respected by police employees, depending heavily on their operational abilities, however in the case of Chief Davis and Chief Fortier it was the opposite.
After I talk about both forms of leadership I will discuss each quote that was given on the assignment handout. Lastly, I will discuss the questions that have been provided for us to use. Also, throughout the paper I will have statements or remarks from the reading. From the textbook called ____________________ by Ciulla, there is two quotes that she has put into the textbook which refers back to a key point.
Week Four: Critical Thinking Assignment Do you think that this chapter (8) has accurately described the police personality? Why or why not? Can you identify any additional characteristics of the police personality? Are there any listed here that you do not think are accurate?
The actual life of a police officer is spent responding to crimes, interviewing witnesses and suspects, apprehending fugitives, and collecting evidence. They witness and experience many traumatic events, such as having to respond to a murder call or a rape situation. Things, such as the ones mentioned lead to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Police officers (PTSD). PTSD is a disorder that may be triggered by witnessing or experiencing traumatic events. Law enforcement officers’ experience these events at one point while on duty, which is why PTSD is common within this line of duty.
At the top of the organizational chart, we have the Chief of Police and under him, the assistant Chief of Police; at which point, the chart further divides into other areas with lesser ranked individuals in charge of each of them. This provides a clear example of how “authority flows downward in the organization”. (Swanson, Territo & Taylor, 2012, p. 221). One interesting item of note is that, although the officers in the pictures are wearing military-style rank, they are using alternative titles vice the traditional ones for example, officers wearing the traditional insignia of a First Lieutenant are called Managers or Commanders as described in Figure 6.3 of our textbook. (Swanson et al, 2012, p.
Leadership is an essential aspect of any organization or group that wants to achieve its objectives. Over the years, several leadership theories have been developed and applied in various settings to enhance the effectiveness of leaders. In this essay, we will compare and contrast the application of leadership theory in two case studies of Al Capone, one of the most notorious gangsters in American history. We will also examine the ethical and sustainable use of power in these case studies. Al Capone was a prominent American gangster who rose to power during the prohibition era in the 1920s.
The organizational factors include: flexibility, responsibility, standards, rewards, clarity, and commitment. The research shows that the coercive and pacesetting styles have a negative correlations on organizational climate while the other four styles have a positive impact. Thus, except for unusual circumstances where coercive and pacesetting styles might be appropriate, leaders should normally use a combination of the authoritative, affiliative, democratic and coaching styles to achieve success. The best leaders will sense from their emotional intelligence when to use each of these styles. If you are an aspiring leader or a leader who wants to get to the next level of leadership excellence, Goleman’s article is a great primer on how to effectively use different leadership
In spite of the fact that’ leadership analysis’ is the art of breaking down a leader into basic psychological components for study and use by academics and practitioners, a sound leadership analyses
Business and management research, 3(2), 67-80. doi:10.5430/bmr.v3n2p67 Knies, E., & Leisink, P. (2014). Leadership behavior in public organizations: A study of supervisory support by police and medical center middle managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 108-127. doi:10.1177/0734371X13510851 Russell, L. M. (2014).
In this regard, leaders and managers can appear at any level of an organisation and are not exclusive of each other (Germano, 2010). Leadership theories identify leaders based upon traits as well as how their influence and power is used to achieve organizational goals and objectives (Germano, 2010). As such, trait based characteristics include leaders such as autocratic, democratic, bureaucratic and charismatic. On the other hand, leadership that is viewed from the perspective of the exchange of power and its utilisation to secure outcomes, are situational, transactional and transformational leaders (Germano, 2010). It is of paramount importance to consider the different types of theories of management and leadership and their potential impact on organizational strategy being that management and leadership plays a vital role in the success of businesses.
Through self-reflection and academic readings, I have discovered that I identify with three different leadership theories. During the first meeting in a Strength Based Leadership class, we were asked to write our leadership history. The class then began an ongoing exploration of various leadership theories. Upon reviewing my leadership history from the first class and synthesizing the information from the theories that were examined, I discovered that I most resonate with the Trait Leadership Theory, the Skills Leadership Theory, and the Path-Goal Leadership theory. These theories are leader focused, describing the process and techniques a leader uses to accomplish goals.
Different scholars identified various kinds of leadership styles that affect the job performance, satisfaction and learning and development of subordinates. Warrick, D.D (1981) cited that there are no doubt variables other than a leader’s style that affect employee performance and development but leadership style plays a significant role and not to be underestimated. An awareness of leadership styles and their consequences are very important because it may either facilitate or inhabit skill development. The major theories on leadership are the traits, leadership styles and contingency theories.
If the behavior theory can identify the key determinants of leadership, people can actually train to become a leader. This is the premise of the management development plan. There are many different types of behavioural leadership styles. Each style suggests that the leadership role is based on the leaders’ concern for the people being led and the level of achievement that needs to be