There are many contributing factors that lead the police to arrest and eventually prosecuting Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley. The main factor that effected lead the public to convicting Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley of the murder of those three boys was fear. After the crime was committed, many people were in fear that there was a psychopath out on the loose that might continue to murder with this thought in the public’s mind they pressured the police to find the killer as soon as possible so that they can feel safe. This led the police to apprehend Jessie and coax a confession out of him that should have not been the case. If the police did not find the killer or a suspect in a reasonable amount of time, they would be called incompetent or try to fire people within the police department like Detective Gitchell, this forced the police to find somebody and name them as the suspect. Once a suspect was named in the case, the public further pressured the police to make sure the suspects were convicted just for the public’s need of justice. If the police instead not had the pressure to find the killer they would have had enough time and resources to gather evidence and get the correct killer. The public does have the right to demand justice for a crime but in this case it …show more content…
The media heavily influenced the public perception of the suspects in many ways, one way was by influencing potentially the potential jurors of the case with commentary of satanic cults. In Paradise Lost 3, there was a small portion talking about a juror that had the belief that these kids were guilty of the crime of killing the small boys before even seeing the evidence at the trial. It would be safe to assume that this juror was heavily influenced by what he saw on the news and the rumors caused by the
In the article “Two British Boys”, by William E. Schmidt, James Bulger, who was two years old, was murdered. In the hour before the ruthless murder where they beat him with stones, bricks, and metal, they intentionally lied to concerned civilians who approached the two boys as they dragged a screaming James Bulger down the sidewalk. “Some passers-by did intervene on James 's behalf, only to be told by the boys that James was either a younger brother or a lost child they were taking to a nearby police station. When one woman challenged that explanation, telling the boys they were walking away from the police station, one said they had been wrongly sent that way by someone else. ”(Schmidt, 10).
The West Memphis Three was a trail convicting three teenagers: Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley of killing three little boys; Michael Moore, Stevie Branch, and Chris Byers. This trail was considered to be a satanic ritual because Damien Echols wasn’t considered normal to the other members of society in his town. He did “dabble in many religions” and Satanism being one with admiring photos of torture and death, but it was not a satanic ritual. The court used members that were far removed from any alleged "Satanic Panic" in West Memphis to give the defendants a better shot at a fair trial and unbiased juries. Damien Echols was sentenced to solitary confinement for eight years from his 20 years in prison.
Police interviewed Echols many times, but he denied any involvement in the murders. They also interviewed Echols’ friend, Jason Baldwin, and he also denied his involvement, but police would not believe the pair. Another friend of Echols was Jesse Misskelley, he would babysit for his neighbor and would tell her that Echols would drink blood and that they would go to “esbat,” which is a gathering of witches. Believing that these three men were the murderers of the three little boys, the media gave them the name “West Memphis Three.” Misskelley, being partly mentally retarded, was interviewed by the police for hours and like the previous two, denied being a part of the murders and any involvement in devil worshipping.
The police were unsure as what to do, for the first six weeks they investigators had no leads on who was the killer. The first lead the investigators accumulated was a phone call from a ex convict who was named Floyd Wells. He was in jail for an armed robbery and had a cellmate Richard Hickock but they called him Dick. This was an interesting person to receive a call from since he had previously worked for the Clutter family on their farm. He told his stories to Dick to pass time in jail but his details of the stories included names of the family members and where the
These five boys were all present in Central Park the night of Meili’s assault and that night, April 19th 1989, they were taken to the central park precinct. They were questioned for over twenty-four hours and forced to give a false confession. They were proven innocent thirteen years later when Reyes admitted to the crime and was proven guilty. All of the boys spent at least seven years in prison for this crime they did not even
The topic I have chosen to research is crimes that are infamous in New Zealand. The reason I chose to research this topic is because I find research about investigations of crimes and finding out what actually happened really interesting. My hypothesis for the two crimes I have chosen which is the Mark Lundy Trial and the David Bain Trial is that the people who were charged with the murders are guilty and I believe those who were released should not have been released. The two questions I will be focussing on are “Was Mark Lundy guilty?” and “Was David Bain guilty?”
They grabbed him from a shopping mall, walked with him through the suburbs of Bootle and Walton, then took him to a secluted area on train tracks and killed him. This case attracted media attention, for the reaon of the murderers being only ten year old. In the trial 38 witness testified, that they saw the three boys and most of them saw that Bulger was in distress. But only a few of them intervened but not to the extent that they saved Bulger.
Secondly he brought them to his home and committed the acts, and laastly he used his power, influence, and money to cover up accusations. Some cases were brought to court and others were paid hush money. Survivors continue to tell the stories of horror and trauma today, though they are discredited by die hard fans but all the facts show to him being guilty. MIchael jackson was know to grom the
So some believe that with out a doubt that they should have gone to court. The children should not have gone to court for three reasons. The first reason they should not have gone to court is because it was dangerous. The second reason that the kids should not have gone to court is because they were too young.
The purpose behind all of this was to sell papers and by working side by side with the police the media influenced multiple aspects of the case. In such instances as stating “Why no Inquest, do it now, Dr. Gerber” this is a personal attack that demonstrates how media persuaded this case (Neff, 2002, p. 85). Not only was the media working side by side with the authorities, it helped evolve the case to be that much more one sided. The media was in an excited rage that it not only reported a one sided account that was based on personal opinion but it also mentioned about Sam affair with Susan Hayes, which is more like gossip rather than news. Attitudes about infidelity at that time, this helped to convict Sam because it reinforced that he was an evil person if he would do this to his
The O.J. Simpson case was a different one because he was a celebrity. The celebrity status made all the difference in the case, as most people had diverse views on the case. As a famous individual, the media also had the chance to broadcast the trial and give differences of opinion on the case. The celebrity status had a significant influence in the O.J. Simpson case as the public had to struggle with an image he had created for many years. People knew O.J. Simpson as a footballer and an actor with a charming character impossible to hurt anyone.
Both were unarmed and did not seem to endanger the lives of the police officers who were involved. In En Vogue’s song “Free Your Mind” there is a line “Before you can read me you got to learn how to see me”. This perfectly illustrates the story of these men. The police arguably acted based on their prejudices, before assessing the situation. Also, the most abhorrent part of the entire
The prime suspects were identified within three days of the murder as David Norris, Gary Dobson, Jamie Acourt, Luke Knight and Neil Acourt (Hall, 2009). However, police failed to make any arrests at this time. Brian Weeden, the officer leading the investigation, claims that the decision not to arrest the suspects at the
Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher Name Academic Institution Author Note Class Professor Date TABLE OFCONTENTS1 CASE/OFFENDER 3 OFFENSE/CRIME 4 MOTIVATIONS/BACKGROUND 4 THEORY 5 VICTIMS 6 COSTS 7 ADJUDICATION/DISPOSITION (PROSECUTION/SENTENCING) 7 CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 10 Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher
Over the years, new equipment and methods had been created to help determine whether those charged with heinous crimes are innocent or guilty but before that and even now innocent people are being sentenced to death for crimes they