SUMMARY In this study, the researcher has presented political campaign speeches that encode power and dominance with ideological undertone. The work also reveals some hidden meanings and messages that are embedded in the linguistic expressions used. The linguistic and extra-linguistic variables of the communicative event including the socio-cultural, socio-political and socio-linguistic indices of the environment which influence the structure and the functions of the political messages were also considered. The researcher has demonstrated that discourse has structure, meaning and action. In Fairclough‟s opinion, discourse reflects an action. Secondly, there is a dialectical relationship between discourse and social structures, in which social …show more content…
Within the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, language plays a vital role in manifesting, creating and sustaining power relations and ideological structures of society. These power relations are reproduced, enacted and legitimized by the application of certain linguistic devices. Such linguistic devices, as text production strategy, could be seen in the use of strong and mild imperatives, enactment of lexical items with negative expressive value, use of declaratives and figurative expressions among others. The study reveals amazingly discourse structures that have implications for power and ideology in order to uncover hidden meanings and messages that are embedded in the linguistic expressions used. It is obvious, that politics is a game that can be successfully played through skilful manipulation of language to project ideological positions that do not always square up with the realities of the day. In a final note, it is important to remark that politicians take advantage by developing their fear about certain minorities and proclaiming derogatory remarks as well as the bread mentality of the poor masses to manipulate their thinking and decision on who to vote for, especially in elections. It is important also to note that Critical Discourse Analysis is an important analytical tool for the study of campaign speeches in America. Its provisions as a theoretical framework contain necessary features for demystifying ideological positions that are embedded in linguistic strategies with hidden intentions. It should also be stated that this study does not contain the final word in the study of the language of political campaigns in America. Presidential speeches can be studied using the same theoretical approach. It is hoped that further researches in the field will help to produce results that will be more rewarding. The study, therefore, concluded
We are getting into the season where political canidates will start campaigning and we will be seeing more of this. I believe that these canidates are using rhetorics to munipulate your thoughts and persuade you through manipulations. We will see more speeches with rhetorics as the months go by. I believe the majority of rhetorics are to persuade you through manipulation. It is more difficult to spot the rhetorics that are out there to enhance the statements.
Rhetorical Analysis Essay In the article, “Healing the Political Divide,” written by Kirk Waldroff, he uses multiple rhetorical devices and appeals to make his point clear. This article is based on our time now, the present generation and the most recent, oldest generation. Waldroff’s purpose for this piece is to explain and provide a beneficial source of information on how to heal from being politically divided. Waldroff wanted to provide a piece with reliable sources and information, in order for people to listen to his “why’s?”
In dealing with the structure of something, you must decide how the words must flow, and how much attention each part must receive. Analyzing words, the rhetor is drawn to what is highlighted as important, firstly, and what is deemed not as important secondly; however, in looking at the text as a whole, the analysis is key to this. This could be illustrated in listening to a political speech, as they put forth the most important pressing issues first, and subsequent smaller issues next; this pairs with the form, in how the words are put together for the audience to interpret. In all, the form and genre are productive to persuasion, and in what form the rhetor analyzes text. The type of the message, is also important to how analysis of rhetorical criticism takes place; more so, how the individuals writing, or speaking, and how they deliver the argument, is up for analysis; “whoever controls the shape of the discussion controls its consequences as well.
Similar to how Aristotle and other individuals took a keen interest in the study of rhetoric and selected a particular area of focus, the authors in this essay concentrate on race and race relations. Initially, it points out that the evaluation and analysis of how race is integrated within the study of rhetoric and how it affects various cultures is still in its premature stages. The article is an
Not only was the 2016 Presidential election full of controversy, it was also bursting with multiple forms of rhetoric. Rhetoric was best defined by the 300 B.C. philosopher Aristotle, who stated that rhetoric is “the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.” (Rapp, 2010) This definition has lasted through the centuries; to this day it is still one of the prominent definitions of rhetoric in America. President Donald J Trump and, runner up, Hilary Clinton both used rhetoric throughout their campaign very effectively.
Two American politicians have made speeches about what direction they want their country to take. In this task, I am going to point out what language features and literary devices the politicians use to persuade the ones who listen to their speech. Speech 1 is made by Craig Johnson, and speech 2 is made by Susan Kilpatrick. When writing argumentative and persuasive texts, the purpose is to make someone believe you. Argumentative and persuasive texts overlap each other to a certain point, but when an argumentative text uses facts, a persuasive text also uses three different appeals.
Q1) The writer’s main contention is that it should be made illegal for politicians to tell lies that mislead the general public. The three supporting arguments include: Anyone who knowingly lies in a court of law can be legally prosecuted, and politicians lies can have more implications on the general public than this. Politician’s lies have a vast effect on the democratic system and hence our society in general.
In James Paul Gee’s essay “What Is Literacy?’ , he uses the key term ‘discourses’. Gee explains discourses as a placement in society or the belonging to a group in society. Gee states that it come from an individual’s saying, doings, or just their identity. As Gee elaborates on discourses he breaks them down into different areas in which relate to one another.
The way communication changes when talking to an audience or talking to fellow people in the field is something that occurs in each. Though each of these discourse communities use different sets of jargon. The idea of making an idea easier for an audience of common people is something that happens with both communities. Another important aspect that is the same among the discourse communities is the cost. Though the cost comes from different areas, the bottom line the cost is great.
Creations, like most things in life, are improvable. Ideas and theories are always evolving into different ideas or more sophisticated ones. Discourse communities is a term that has been debated over the years. Three of those debaters are James Paul Gee, James P. Porter, and John Swales. In this essay I will analyze what each of these writers see as the definition of a discourse community while comparing specific points that each of them have regarding their personal view on the subject.
For example, when we write an essay, we need to show how the text convinces us of its position. As a citizen, it is important to use rhetorical analysis in our daily life. It is a great tool to sort out questions about politics and relationship. For example, during the election period, we should use rhetorical analysis to analyze the candidate’s message to critical thinking skill to determine whether or not their words are true.
A discourse in this understanding is not based on the classical distinction between thought and action, it “(…) is about the production of knowledge through language. But it is itself produced by a practice: “discursive practice” – the practice of producing meaning” (Hall, 2006:165). It follows that because all social practices involve meaning, all practices necessarily have a discursive side. A discourse is comparable to what sociologists would call an ‘ideology’. It is composed of statements and/or beliefs that shape knowledge in the interest of one particular group.
Both authors show that power can be obtained in many different ways and can be used to corrupt or build up others, depending on how we use our power. Language is power. Without language, a person might not gain power. By the use of language, we can influence, direct, oppress, and manipulate others. Animal Farm discusses on how power is obtained through language and its correlation with education, class structure, and human nature.
This mini project paper analyses the approaches used by the President Barack Obama in his inauguration speech which he delivered on 21ST January 2013. The study focus solely on the approaches used by Barack Obama to deliver his ideology as the President of the United States of America to get the public to be acquainted with his administration agenda moving forward to strengthen the democrats in the inauguration speech rhetorically. The discourse analysis was carried out based on the video recording of the inauguration speech delivered by President Barack Obama in 2013 which was then uploaded in YouTube and the findings of this research will be presented in textual analysis along with review of related studies. Keywords: Discourse analysis, Barack Obama, Inauguration speech, Rhetoric, Democrats 1.0 Introduction Discourse
Language is a direct indicator of power; those who are adept in controlling the language are able to exploit the ignorance of those under them and thus assert their dominance. As demonstrated throughout