1. Introduction Oliver and Holzinger (2008,p.496) define strategic political management, also called corporate political behavior, as an effort to use the capabilities of the national government or other policy-making institutions in order to increase and seize beneficial returns from the political environment. Especially the aspects of value maintenance and value creation play a vital role when interacting with government policies. In the past years, this attempt became a key determinant for a firm’s overall performance and a crucial source of value creation and value maintenance as explained by Oliver and Holzinger (2008, p.500-501). This paper discusses the roles that corporate political strategies play and their influence upon a firm’s …show more content…
First of all, a firm needs to reflect which strategic orientation it wants to follow, by especially focusing on which dynamic capabilities they possess, and whether they want to maintain existing value or further create value. When a firm intends to maintain existing value it can either make use of a defensive strategy by actively exerting influence on policy makers or persuading the government to maintain current policies. An example for this strategic behavior can be explained by lobbyism where a firms aims at extending entry barriers for competitors as given by Oliver and Holzinger (2008, p. 506-510). The second approach for maintaining value, given by Oliver and Holzinger (2008, p.507-508), would be a reactive strategy, which is more appropriate for firms focusing on internal capabilities. Hereby the firm actively adapts and realigns structures in order to comply with changing …show more content…
Given the societal-political context a firm operates in, it has to choose the best fitting set of strategies and tactics taking into account many interconnected variables such as industry, firm size and various competing interest groups. By being able to actively shape government policy, a firm is able to gain control over critical resources and its policies and thereby drawing an important advantage for the success of the firm. This interplay between the firm and the government bears a great potential in favor for a firm but also for the wellbeing of the whole
Their power to change laws and regulations has given them access like it never had before. Corporate
Politicians who avoided taking strong positions on whether they were pro or anti-trust were seen as cowards who would rather cater to big business than ensure the welfare of citizens. However, politicians were also reluctant to take action because they were being influenced by these corporations. A political illustration that arose at this time titled “The Bosses of the Senate”, demonstrates the ease at which monopolists were able to influence political decisions - or lack thereof (Document 3). The illustration depicts several industries-copper, steel, oil, iron, and coal- as bags of money hovering over senators at their desks. During this era, monopolists were able to buy state legislatures, which directly appointed senators to congress, and controlled which senators were in office through bribery, intimidation, and threats.
There are a vast amount of negative effects that are caused by the political machine in both history and today's modern society. One problem that is present throught both history and now is corruption. As shown with Boss Tweed in the 1800s and most politcs today, politicians can use the political machine for their own financial wants and needs. As an example, Boss Tweed used the political machine to create fake leases and vouchers to increase his wealth, which, as a result, financially drained New York City. Another problem is that political machines will often be negative for canidates not involved in the machines.
The reason for companies wanting to dip their toes into the waters of politics was that if they could control the ability to write and pass new laws, they would be able to expand their capital and grow their business through new laws and legislature. One example of the overwhelming governmental power that a corporation can hold is that of the “third house” of the Pennsylvannian government, which was comprised of railroad representatives in Pennsylvania. It was said that these non-elected railroad heads commanded just as much power as the genuinely elected officials. Another way that companies would gain power in the political sector was by holding their own elections that they had rigged in their own favor. Another form of corruption in the government at this time was not actually orchestrated by companies from the outside, but perpetrated by law makers on the inside.
Legitimacy theory is a “positive theory” that asserts that businesses are bound by the implicit “social contract” that the corporation agrees to perform that are specifically relating to social and environmental issues (Rankin, et al. 2012, 142). To remain congruent with societal values in which it operates, a corporation can address attributes that relate to this theory through voluntary social and environmental disclosures made on platforms like its annual report (Coebergh 2011, 65). Virgin Australia has various groups of important stakeholders who can affect or is affected by both the actions and activities of the corporation (Laasch and Conaway 2014, 97). They are namely, guests, employees, investor groups and shareholders, unions, non-government
As a result, the impact of large enterprises on the government is becoming more and more big, and big enterprises seem to learn more and more how to achieve their own interests in the
As details of economic, competitive, and stakeholder pressures unfold in the case, it is
Our 27th President, Theodore Roosevelt, addressed that “our government, national and State, must be freed from the sinister influence or control of special interests. Exactly as the special interests of cotton and slavery threatened our political integrity before the Civil War, so now the great special business interests too often control and corrupt the men and methods of government for their own profit” (Roosevelt, 1910).
While some Americans blame the government for it being undemocratic, the elected officials have provided us with evidence that America is undemocratic. An ideal democracy is how the government puts the people’s interest before the businesses interest. In Lindblom’s story “The Market as Prison”, it introduces a mechanism called the automatic punishing recoil mechanism (APRM). This provides businesses to have a privileged position in society.
It can be said that by means of organisation’s competitive strategy, it can achieve an upper hand in the business market over its rivals. Competitive Advantage offers a beneficial position to business organisations over rivals in regards of some measure like expense, quality, or velocity. An efficient strategy can help an organisation to achieve an upper hand through commitment to its strategic objectives and the capacity to significantly expand execution and profitability (Bartlett & Ghoshal,
It is the firm’s obligation to evaluate in its decision-making processes the effects of its decisions on the external social system in a manner that will accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains, which the firm seeks. It means that social responsibility begins where the law ends. A firm is not being socially responsible if it merely complies with the minimum requirements of the law, because this is what any good citizen would do.” A firm will not survive without the support of both the stakeholders and shareholders, thus the CSR proposes the indication which states that a firm can never exist In a vacuum (Khalidah et. al.).
Logrolling is when a congressman helps approve a project to gain the other congressman’s vote. Entrepreneurial politics is the opposite of the client politics, they give benefits to the whole society and the costs are directed at a small group of people. One example of it is when the anti pollution and safety requirements for automobiles were proposed as ways of improving the health and well-being of all people at the expense of automobile manufacturers. This is an example that shows that a widely distributed benefits and also a narrowly concentrated costs that are imposed on automobile
Regulations that the government implement, licensing for example, increases the barrier of entry into the market and decreases ways for the traders to gratify consumer demand. This case is prevalent in the monopoly market. The market is sometimes best to decide how much and what to produce since it has better information and knowledge of the consumers compared to the government. Economic decisions may also not be competent when the government is motivated by political power rather than economic imperatives. Sometimes, economic policies are designed to retain power rather than to ensure maximum efficiency in the economy.
“Good units walk a thin line between indiscipline and ineffectiveness. Ignore the rules too often and you’ve got a mob, but enforce the rules too strictly and you’ve got a herd.” by Henry V. O’Neil represents the notion behind an effective organizational behavior. In an organizational settings, how well the employees are managed and understood depends on the leadership style exhibited by the leaders. Finding the right balance between being too strict or too easy with the employees not only create an ideal work environment but also increase productivity and reduce employee turnover.
State-owned enterprises are difficult to penetrate for a foreign company like JPM. Employees with guanxi can minimize JPM’s costs, especially for government procedures, requirements and taxes. Connections add a significant measure of flexibility and freedom inside an authoritarian political system and is critical to JPM’s market access. Hiring the sons and daughter of these ruling elite give JPM immediate access to not just their connections but the connections of their parents as well. This is reflected in the hiring practices and the resultant connections with China Everbright and China Railway Group.