Hegemonic Stability

INTRODUCTION

Research question Isolated for the centuries, where ideology grew up within Bushido (code of values espoused by the samurai class during the Tokugawa era) rules and the place, which ruled by skilled shoguns, has become political-economically one of the inconceivable strongest figure in the world politics. Moreover, Japan can easily compete with the giants like United States, China or Asian tigers even in case, which it suffers from a scarcity of the natural resources most critical to its economic well-being. Despite catastrophe in Hiroshima and Nagasaki after bombing, United States and Japan still allies. After 2000, both sides decided to strengthen their relationship and focus on developing military power. My thesis question

The first deficiency is the problem of not dealing straightforwardly with the question of political unions. In the theory of economic liberalism this deficiency is clear, but even in political realism a narrowness of vision has seen the problem of political union only within the framework of the nationstate. In other words, there has not been an adequate attempt to deal with the state (or its functional equivalent) on a global scale. Certainly the worldstate does not exist. But the political agenda of providing a common foundation for world governance throughout the world does exist, if only for the sake of the ideal of free trade. As mentioned above, the theory of economic liberalism has a theory of public goods as an imperfect substitute for a theory of the state, and one can at least imagine a similar approach to the discussion of international relations. In short, if a liberal theory of international relations is to apply the theory of the domestic market economy to the international economy, then the suppliers of public goods who are tacitly assumed to exist in the domestic economy should also be assumed to exist in the international economy. The mainstream of existing theory on international relations has in fact ignored this necessary requirement. However, we must consider the question of public

Of course, given resources and other conditions, disparities in economic scale (for example, GNP) will appear among the various countries. But this does not mean that a single great power will tower above the rest in terms of technology and standard of living (for example, per capita GNP). The problem is not only with the rise of a hegemon. As Gilpin says, "uneven growth" among the various countries is a fundamental fact in the industrialized world, but neoclassical economics has nothing to say about why this should be