ipl-logo

Political, Social And Economic Causes Of The Bolshevik Revolution

996 Words4 Pages

Throughout 1917-24 Russia was undergoing a massive political, social and economic change that started with the Bolshevik revolution. The First World War had left Russia in a tragic state where the land was fronting a lot of communal discontent and confronting a huge revolt. The year 1917 was the start of Russia’s struggle for control as the revolt started political, social and economic changes. A lot of Russians had lost their trust and faith in Tsar Nicholas II’s ability to lead by 1917, political corruption was widespread, the Russian economy continued backward and Nicholas repetitively disregarded the Duma, the elected legislative body that constituted the imperial Russian legislature, however, the direct reason of the February Revolution was Russia’s devastating connection to World War I. Militarily, Russia was no match for Germany, and Russian casualties were greater than those sustained by any nation in any previous war. Meanwhile, the economy was miserably unsettled by the expensive war and everyone joined the calling for the overthrow of the Tsar.

The Provisional Government was successful in a smallest degree in terms of keeping Russia under control. There was a lack of food in the towns due to the peasant 's attacks. The people in the towns liked Alexander Kerensky and supported him to a certain level, however the peasants wanted him gone. There were many casualties. This is why it is ineffective and would 've been improved if Alexander paid more devotion to the

Show More
Related

  • Oscar Wilde's Examples Of Disobedience Throughout The World

    776 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the early 1900’s the Russian people had become angry at the way the Russian monarchy (Tsar Nicholas II) had handled foreign affairs and how he was treating his people unfairly. They had many protests, one in 1905 and two in 1917. The revolution in 1905 overthrow the absolute monarchy and put in a provisional government. No one really listened to the provisional government, so they overthrew it again in 1917. These revolutions and acts of disobedience led to many unnecessary deaths of innocent people.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Nicholas II: Twilight Of The Empire By Dominic Lieven

    658 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the historical monograph Nicholas II: Twilight of the Empire, Dominic Lieven revisits the life and times of the last emperor of Russia and the Romanov dynasty—Nicholas II. Lieven analyzes Nicholas II’s life experiences from early childhood to his death during the Bolshevik Revolution. With the conviction that past studies on Nicholas II and the fall of the Russian Empire have been insufficient for better understanding the tsar’s true role in the context of his time. Lieven argues that Nicholas II was not strictly a stupid or incompetent leader, who single handedly brought and end to the Russian autocracy. Instead, Lieven suggests that numerous decisions made by the Russian tsar were in many circumstances reasonable—when considering Russia’s political, social, and economic contexts.

    Read More

  • How Did Stalin Lead To The Russian Revolution

    774 Words  | 4 Pages

    From 1928, when the plan started, to 1932 to its end, many factories, dams, power stations and even cities were being built. Despite there being harsh penalties implemented to workers for failure to meet their targets, there was still a significant increase in Russia’s industrial growth in a very short period of time. Just like the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, under Tsar Alexander II, in protest of Stalin’s policies, the peasants, in protest, refused to work harder than they needed too, causing them to destroy livestock and crops, which eventually lead to their unnecessary death. Stalin, just like the Tsarist autocratic regime, was not committed to collectivism but preferred capitalism in his ruling of the Soviet Union. This caused a lot of rebellion from the Kulaks who opposed collectivism.

    Read More

  • How Did Stalin Influence The Soviet Union

    93 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Soviet Union in Russia used violence to govern their people by exiling or exucuting the bourgeois. The Bourgeois, during that time, had major influence on Russia because of their status, power and wealth. Stalin was the ringleader, as he controlled the population through his swordsman called the KGB. When the Soviet Union was in power twenty million innocent Russain citizans died, and for the people who survivied they lived in famion, fear and fatigue. Therefore, because Stalin killed over twenty million people for his lust of power, Russia was governed by

    Read More

  • Czar Nicholas And The Romanov Dynasty

    1227 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Provisional Government: The Provisional Government was the system appointed to rule Russia after the citizens had lost faith in their leader, Czar Nicholas ll. This system was planned to be permanent, until the Soviet inflicted. On March 1st the Soviet issued its first order into taking over Russia; taking control of the army by commanding them to only obey the Soviet. As the Soviet was becoming stronger, the Provisional Government was becoming weaker. They reorganized four times.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Terror In Joseph Stalin's Blood Purges

    656 Words  | 3 Pages

    Joseph Stalin, 1878-1953, established totalitarianism in Russia, and forever changed the nation. He used police force to gain power, and instilled fear in all of his followers. This reign of terror was known as the Blood Purges or the Great Terror. During the Blood Purges, Stalin blamed Russian citizens for crimes he committed, and imposed the worst of punishments on them. Death or being sent to a labor camp, such as Gulag, was the fate of most.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq Essay

    1044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Question: Evaluate the rule of Stalin in the Soviet Union, taking into consideration the changes made and the methods used. Russia’s turbulent start in the 20th century was characterized by their involvement in the first world war, being the critical factor in the Bolsheviks seize for power in the October Revolution in 1917. Vladimir Lenin rose into power and lead Russia toward a communist nation with extreme centralization and doctrinaire socialism but the Kronstadt Rebellion of March 1921 forced Vladimir Lenin to begin the New Economic Party in order to stay in power. The policy allowed private ownership and management of agriculture, trade, and small businesses. However, upon Lenin’s death in 1924, rose Joseph Stalin as the leader of

    Read More

  • The Bloody Sunday Massacre: The Cause Of The 1905 Russian Revolution

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    On Sunday January the 9th , or the 22nd depending on whether you are going by the Julian or Gregorian calendars, peaceful demonstrators marched on in the snow blanketed streets of St. Petersburg, continuing through the cold and frigid temperatures of January in St. Petersburg to go and voice their concerns to their Czar. These protesters, armed only with only religious symbols, pictures of the Czar, and the petitions in which they had outlined their grievances, had no idea of the horrors that awaited at the Winter Palace. The Grand Duke Vladimir, having failed to halt the protests, met the peaceful protests with gunfire and bloodshed. Bullets ripped through the cold St. Petersburg air, replacing the silence with screams of terror and agony.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx: The Contributions Of Vladimir Lenin And Marxism

    1543 Words  | 7 Pages

    Andre Abi Haidar PSPA 210 INTRODUCTION It is always difficult to write about and discuss Karl Marx, or more importantly the applications of Marx’s theories, due to the fact that he inspired and gave rise to many movements and revolutionaries, not all of which follow his theories to the point. Although Marx tends to be equated with Communism, it might not seem righteous to blame him for whatever shortcomings occurred when his theories were put to the test; Marx passed away well before the revolution in Russia, and he played no role in the emergence of the totalitarian regime at the time. When discussing Marx, however, Vladimir Lenin is one of the biggest highlights when it comes to studying the outcomes of Marx’s theories.

    Read More

  • Nicholas II: The Student Resources In Context

    736 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although Russia was once again in a terrible position for war the fought in the first World War and their country and its people faced further hardships. The people began to revolt and took over the government and then assassinated Nicholas II’s entire

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Memoirs Of A Revolutionist By Vera Figner

    444 Words  | 2 Pages

    In analysis of Vera Figner’s Memoirs of a Revolutionist, Figner expressed a few political goals that led her to assume violence as the only answer to the economic, political, and social injustices forced upon the peasants, by the government authority and Russian traditions. All of Figner’s energy was spent in effort to achieve these goals at any cost. These goals were to use influential propaganda, to educate the peasants1, and to kill the Tsar. All of which, were used to motivate a peasant uprising, to remove2 the suppressive Tsarist regime and to give birth to democratically3 free institutions4. To justify her violent means, she used her personal belief that there were no other peaceful ways, that they had not tried, to provide liberty and justice for the peasants.5

    Read More

  • Positive Benefits Of War Communism

    1012 Words  | 5 Pages

    War communism had a devastating impact on the peasants and proletariat in Russian society between 1918 and 1928. However, the New Economic Policy that followed the Civil War effects was opposite, raising living standards and reinstating support for the Bolshevik party. Vladimir “Lenin” Ulyanov, known as the head of the notorious Bolshevik party, introduced War Communism (1918-1921) and the NEP (1921-1928). As Martin McCauley states “If War Communism was a leap into socialism then the New Economic Policy was a leap out of socialism” The aims of War Communism and the NEP were both successful in a large number of areas, however, the effects of both policies were not all favourable.

    Read More

  • What Are The Similarities Between Mexico And Russian Revolutions

    1147 Words  | 5 Pages

    There was lots of cruel treatment towards the peasants of the society. The working conditions in Russian were very poor. The city laborers experiences terrible service in the industrial economic system. The discontent of the proletarian lot was further expounded by lack of food, and many military failures. The army structure saw no reason to be loyal to Czar Nicholas II anymore.

    Read More

  • Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).

    Read More

More about Political, Social And Economic Causes Of The Bolshevik Revolution

Open Document