Introduction: After Gorbachev came to power in 1985 a whole series of changes came for the Soviet Union and mostly the Eastern bloc. When the Berlin wall fell on November 9th, 1989 it was clear that the end of communism in that part of the world was coming and Bulgaria was part of that change as well. After being under communist rule for 44 years it was time for the country to transform into a democratic state, however doing that was harder than it looked like. How successful was the political transition of Bulgaria depended on factors that were in close connection to the economic and social transition as well. To begin with, Bulgarians had the choice to go through a peaceful transition or a violent revolution and fortunately for the country …show more content…
A new constitution had to be made in order for the country to turn into a democratic state and the left and the right were able to work together for the creation of this document. Of course, there were still some tensions between the two parties and both were really keen to be in power, however there weren’t any confrontations taking place between the two. Both parties, the Socialist and Democratic, had opportunities to prove themselves on the government arena, but the Democratic Party seemed to have better understanding of how transition would work the best for Bulgaria. Finally, one of the main difficulties that the country had to overcome were the economic problems that arose during 1997 and that was the last step Bulgaria had to make in order to successfully go through it’s transition years. The transition in Bulgaria between 1989-1997 was a long process that through the unity of the people and parties was able to successfully change to a democracy. This whole period of Bulgaria’s history was important, because it put the basics of the country's …show more content…
UDF was formed at December 7th 1989 and Dr Zheliu Zhelev was appointed as a chairman , later becoming the president of Bulgaria. They are the ones who would later organized public demonstrations whenever BSP was doing something contradictory to democracy. Both parties didn’t have much in common, except for the fact that they both had a vision of a democratic Bulgaria. Being able to overcome the differences was crucial to how well transition would go and it seemed like UDF had a harder time doing that. 15th of May 1991 UDF leaves Grand National Assembly, because of an argument about the constitution with the socialist party, however it didn’t take a lot of time for them to come back. National Roundtable Talks were organized between the leaders of UDF and BSP in order for them to come to agreements on how they need to carry out the transition and to make the new constitution of Bulgaria. They had to go through really hard negotiations and often had to make compromises towards each other in order for those talks to go smoothly. The Turkish minority was invited to participate in those talks as well, however none of the invited people decided to take part of this. The propositions from both sides of the roundtable were contradicting and it took a lot of time to come to an agreement. Controversies were mainly centered on the presidential institution, because the UDF wanted the elected government to
Furthermore, Ronald Reagan started his argument with uses of word choices and appeals of emotions which creates strong feelings that effectively helps him to persuade the Soviet Union as well as the president Gorbachev. As he mentioned in paragraph two “standing before the Brandenburg gate, every man is a German, separated from his fellow man, every man is a Berliner forced to look upon a scar” here Reagan expressed the feeling of not being able to be connected to the other part of German. Those emotional appeal makes the Soviet Union to think about how the people were not connected to the other side of the berlin wall, which creates an eagerness inside them to bring down the
The restart of a central government demonstrates that the majority of people resented government ideas, and that these needed to be taken over by one that’s unbiased and listens to the demands of the
Geographical variations between the two countries demonstrates the need for two very different systems of government. One is able to deduce from a visual perspective, that Greece is much
Soviet Union: What Should Textbooks Emphasize? The Soviet Union, or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), was a transcontinental country that ran under an Authoritarian Communist regime. It was established by Vladimir Lenin in 1917 after the fall of the Russian Monarchy, and officially became the Soviet Union in 1922; The USSR eventually collapsed at the end of 1991 due to destructuring of its centralized government. The history of the Soviet Union is rich and can be difficult to break down. Trying to grasp the Soviet Union’s description for a textbook can be done by separating it into three categories.
At first they were democratic, “It is the people in the Assemblie who grant office to those that deserve it through the elections…and most important of all it is that they make the final decision on the question of
Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.
Back in the 20th century, Russia was a country known as the Soviet Union. On December 25, 1991, however, the Soviet Union came to an end. When the Soviet Union ended, the country was then renamed to Russia. In this essay, we will compare and contrast the Soviet Union with the current U.S and Russian governments. There are many differences between the Soviet Union and The Russian and U.S governments.
After the Second World War, America and the Soviet Union were involved in a political war, although no actual combat took place, there was always impending war hanging over the Americans and Soviets. The growing power within the Soviet Union stirred both government and citizen awareness of the increasing threat to the cultural well-being of the United States. When reviewing the powers of the Soviet Union George Kennan stated, “The Soviet Union is a political force committed to the belief that there is no way to get along with the United States, and they believe it is desirable and necessary that the internal harmony of our society be disrupted…” (Kennan Document 1). The Soviets wanted to destroy the balance of the United States government
The beginning of the 1920s started out peacefully, but by the end of the decade and throughout the 1930s, signs of war were starting to show. Although World War I had ended in victory for the Allies and post - war objectives by the victorious nations had been met and successfully maintained, these underlying causes created the longest and bloodiest war the world had seen. Countries such as Germany, Italy, and Japan started taking aggressive actions. The British Prime Minister Chamberlain suggested that the best way to deal with Hitler was by making a policy of appeasement. European nations waited for the worst before forcing Hitler to halt his invasive actions.
Even though the Cold war ended, the influence of the Soviet Union didn’t. The Soviet Union grew out of the Bolshevik revolution and Civil war in 1917. The USSR was officially established in 1922. So what should textbooks emphasize about the Soviet Union? Well i feel that the three things that a chapter on the Soviet Union in a school textbook should emphasize the Culture, their military, and their economy, now let me explain why.
The Russians Fight Back Three outcome and causes of the Russian revolution were the large amount of peasant population, Russia joined the war when they knew that they couldn’t even pull their own weight, and communism took over Russia. The tsar joined the war thinking that he would gain nationalism and patriotism from the peasants.(doc.1).He thought that all the people would rush to sign up to fight for their country and support the tsar. The first months after joining the war were disastrous. The tsar had to steal from his people to give to the troops who had very little supplies.
20th Century Russia had a massive transformation from being an Autocracy
The Soviet Union has been an enigma, but still, a very significant contributor to the history of the world. There have been many rulers in Soviet Union history. The Soviet Union has been through economic successes and downfalls, ages of terror, a world war, was once an ally of the United States, today is an enemy of the US. If we were to add the history from the Soviet Union to our textbooks , what information should be emphasized? There are many important areas about the Soviet Union, three of them are: cultural achievements, military strength and political repression.
"The Cold War was an ideological contest between the western democracies especially the United States and the Communist countries that emerged after the Second World War" (Tindall 972). The United States and the Soviet Union had differences over issues such as human rights, individual liberties, economic freedom, and religious belief. "Mutal suspicion and a race to gain influence and control over the so called nonaligned or third world countries further polarized" (Tindall 945). After the WWII Soviets dominate European countries and thought the U.S. had the same motives.
Next, the authors (2013) narrow down this definition of technocratic government to “technocrat-led government” by specifying that “a prime minister or minister is a technocrat if, at the time of his/her appointment to government, he/she: (1) has never been elected as a party representative to parliament; (2) is not a formal member of any party. The table 1 shows the final output list of technocrat-led governments, which came into existence in various European Union member states after the Second World War. It would be appropriate to analyze citizens’ technocratic attitudes in all these countries, however, due to the data availability, not all of them will be considered in this paper.