To answer the question we must compare every types of government to determine the best type of government that exist and could exist because every type of government has its own issues that differ from other types of government. But it is said that the best and ideal type of government is the one that gives the greatest happiness and the largest utility to its people which was also the purpose of the state of Plato and Aristotle. Also that a representative democracy is the best and ideal for it gives more responsive and efficient government, representative democracy ensures that the government would not be threatened and be overpowered by a person or a group of people because the state have a representative assembly or a legislature that is paired with a separate branch of the government to ensure balance of power. This tells us that Aristotle’s most practical state a Democratic type of government is also the best and ideal type of …show more content…
St. Augustine thinks monarchy is the ideal type of government and is led by God in a city called the city of God which purpose is to give eternal life and is based on love. This is exactly the opposite of Machiavelli’s political thought wherein for him a secular state is the best and ideal state led by the Prince that lets political not religious criteria determines politics that focuses on immorality not on morality and is based on fear and power. Machiavellian principle was the basis and was used by some leaders in the past that used dictatorship and power to conquer nations to gain more power. In the present time Machiavellian principle is still relevant and used, Russian President Vladimir Putin is one of this. The president wants to return the principles of Machiavelli particularly regarding removing morality on taking political action and setting moral standard on private life and personal …show more content…
It’s because of its two main principles that separates the state from religion and gives equality on people of different religion and beliefs under its laws. Secularism provides separation of religion from the state protects believers and non-believers, religious freedom, equal access on public services, protects freedom of speech and expression which brings democracy and fairness to its people. Secularism creates a society in which all people with religion and those who does not have can live together equally and in harmony with each other. This proves Machiavelli’s political thought is better and is right about the ideal state compare to St. Aquinas.
Machiavellian’s principle also states that it is better to be feared than love, but he also said that achieving both is better. However, being loved and feared as well is hard to achieved so when this times come being feared than loved is much safer but the prince must avoid being hated. In business it is said to be a leader or a CEO must be loved not feared. You could also relate this on managing a country, just like a CEO manage for the company a leader of a country or a state also manage his or her
The Age of Absolutism The Age of Absolutism was a period of prosperity in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries. While at this time many countries had absolute rulers, these rulers were able to make a lot of progress in advancing their nations. These rulers are some of the greatest rulers these countries have ever had and helped lead to the prosperity of this era. During this time period, a majority of the rulers were absolute rulers, having absolute power over their country.
In the beginning, Machiavelli says the ruler should not be concerned with what his people want; however, this does not mean the ruler should not be concerned about having support from his people. Machiavelli simply means a ruler should not go about understanding exactly what the people want and trying to fulfill the needs of the people. A ruler should know whether or not this support exists, and if it does not, he should go about his own ways to acquire this support. Machiavelli talks about different methods to gain this support, but mostly he stresses the importance of the support in helping maintain a calm and controlled rule. Internal support and agreement is crucial in any form of rule.
When you hear the name Machiavelli what do you think of? Malevolence, dictatorship, or Tupac Shakur? What you should think about is cunning or unscrupulousness, “The ends justify the means.” The father of modern political theory, Niccolo Machiavelli was a 15th century political theorist and advisor who insisted we shouldn’t think that politicians are bad or unelectable for manipulating people. In Machiavelli’s distinct view a worthy politician isn’t honest and moral.
He believed that actions done in the name of power should be judged according to their efficiency. Machiavelli believed in no particular religion, but even though he had no sense of it, Machiavelli had a positive view of religion and acknowledged it as a tool of influence and control. With this said, Machiavelli can be compared to the Greek philosopher Critias who said that rulers should encourage the fear of non-existent gods as this encouragement will allow the ruler to control the people. Machiavelli advised that the ruler should spread and support religious beliefs that he knows to be false as it will keep the people well conducted and
Role of Violence While some leaders believe in the rule of law and protection of lives and property, others perceive effective leadership as a combination of controlled violence, cruelty, and extrajudicial killings. Some political philosophers, such as Niccolo Machiavelli, believe in necessary brutality and the capacity of a ruler to act in an entirely self-serving way. Throughout “The Prince,” for example, Machiavelli makes numerous claims about perfect governance that strike the ruler as unnecessarily cruel or harsh. Other scholars, such as Las Casas believe that effective leadership refrains from any form of violence or intimidation. This paper will outline the role of violence within the political arena with reference to the views of Machiavelli
Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the
Niccolo Machiavelli was a person who believed in a strong state. One who believed in the greater good of the state as a whole, not for the great good of the individual. Machiavelli would see the election of President Donald J. Trump as one of good and possible bad. It is hard to say how a political philosopher who lived in a different time, and different place could view a politician like Donald Trump. To be able to do this one would have to look at the philosophies that Machiavelli believed how a state should act.
The main point made by Machiavelli was that men are inherently bad, so a leader must rule in a way that takes this into account. He taught that because of man’s ungratefulness, it is safer to be feared than loved (D-4). This shows that Machiavelli believed that the power and success of a country will lead to the prosperity of its inhabitants. Both influential people believed that a country prospers the most under absolute power.
Aristotle thought the best form of government was a polity or constitutional government; however, a polity was non-existent in Aristotle’s time. Correspondingly, Locke
In Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, he maintains a harsh perspective on reality. His advice on how to maintain power leaves no room for compassion or generousity. While some may believe that these are qualities of a good person, Machiavelli believes these qualities lead to the downfall of rulers. He acknowledges that, in reality, it is impossible for someone to have qualities of a good person and simultaneously a good ruler. Machiavelli’s realistic outlook causes him to emphasize that it is better to maintain power through fear, rather than compassion.
His mindset was simple. to manifest dismay and use the overwhelming power as a dictator. His intentions are clear, and his words are powerful. With a combination of rhetorical devices, a symphony of teachings are made and preached. Machiavelli is a strong advocate to use fear to herd together the common man, he begins his argument by asking a simple question, “ Here the question… safer than to be loved”.
The Prince and the Discourses, by Machiavelli as a gift to the prince. Because it was the best thing that Niccolo Machiavelli could give to him. He was trying to teach the prince ways to stay in power. Machiavelli even stated it himself “I can consider of this subject, discussing what a principality is, the variety of such states, how they are won, how they are held, and how they are lost” (Machiavelli xxiv). The main focus of his work was with monarchies because he did not care for republics.
Machiavelli believed that men will follow a ruler as long as the ruler serves their interests, and a quick to turn against the ruler unless they fear great punishment. Machiavelli would say that it is best to be feared rather than loved as long as the fear does not cause hate, which he believed to be perfectly possible.
He writes that for a government to be successful, the master must allow everything to work around them, without trying to stop of change the universe. They must simply allow the people to believe that they are in complete control and that their master only helps to put all things into motion. Niccolo Machiavelli took a much different approach to his idea of government. He wrote that the ‘prince’ of a land must be extremely deceitful to maintain their power. The prince must always assume that someone else is planning to take him out.
In order to compare and contrast varying types of government within two or more countries, one must have a clear definition of Government and know the purposes it serves. Therefore, I did some research and I have established that Government is a group that exercises dominant power over a nation, state, society or other body of people. Governments are commonly responsible for constructing and implementing laws, handling money, and defending the general population from external threats, and may have other obligations or privileges. All over the world, there are many different types of government within countries. Each kind has its advantages as well as disadvantages regarding the general well-being of its peoples and economy.