The video I chose is about a girl being forced into a polygamist marriage. In the video, the Jones, go to dinner at a family restaurant outside of Colorado City. The family consists of Frank and his three wives Sherry, Laura, Cathy, and a 15 year old named Susan. This video illustrates the bystander effect because the Jones family is placed in an environment where people could intervene. Susan is crying and is told to stop because it is her time to become a wife. Susan keeps saying how she is too young and that she isn’t ready to be a wife, this starts to create a bigger scene. Throughout the video you see many guests just watching this. This setting was recorded for two days, and more than 100 diners witnessed the video and only four intervened, …show more content…
Many viewers could have not joined in to help Susan because of the group or her family, and seeing that the older man was there could have discouraged many people from trying to help out because he is viewed as an authoritative figure. Susan could have not been provided help because of the stereotype that people could have had for the family such as the dress and style that the family was in at the restaurant would allow the other diners to make the assumption that the family is Mormon. Even though polygamy is illegal in the United States, Mormons do still practice it. This same idea could have made the diners prejudice as well, by not wanting to interfere because of the ideas that they have of Mormon faith and practices, the diners could have felt as though that was their faith and although they think it is wrong, it might not be their place to step …show more content…
In the article, would increase or decrease bystander behavior. Four studies were conducted, “participants were asked to imagine that they were walking down the street, then asked to imagine one or five other people walking on the same street. These others were described as strangers, friends, or students. Having imagined the presence of others, they were asked to imagine encountering an incident between a man and a woman that rapidly escalates into a violent attack by the man on the women. Participants were then asked how likely they would be to do nothing/remain uninvolved, to intervene directly (by calling the police, e.g.), or to intervene directly themselves.” In the study the group (Levine) was imagined as strangers, then the greater the group size, the less participants were willing to get involved or to intervene directly. This action can be proved by the video of the young girl Susan. In the first few minutes hidden cameras show a diner clearly upset by what she is hearing and seeing, she and her husband do not interfere directly, the husbands finds a manager and asks to be moved to the other side of the restaurant. As well as another scenario with a diner who takes pictures of Susan with her family, when asked why he did it he said “to show to the pictures to the cops”. Both the couple and the man are acting indirectly. The article goes on to say, when
George Reynolds, was a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints living in the Utah Territory under federal laws. Reynolds married Amelia Jane Schofield while still being married to Mary Ann Tuddenham, therefore he was charged with the violation of the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act which is a federal law forbidding polygamy in all federal territories. This act stated that "Every person having a husband or wife living, who marries another, whether married or single, in a Territory, or other place over which the United States have exclusive jurisdiction, is guilty of bigamy, and shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500, and by imprisonment for a term of not more than five years..." Reynolds did not dispute the fact that he had broken the law, but instead argued that it was a religious requirement that he marry multiple women. The Mormon religion supported multiple marriages; in fact, polygamy was even seen as a religious obligation for most Mormon men.
From the article it states,”Later,
After a young lady, Kitty Genovese, was stabbed to death, it was found that there were about 38 witnesses to the stabbing but none of the people had tried to help Genovese in any way. Of the 38 witnesses, no one had even called the police (Darley & Latane, 1968). Researchers were curious as to why in emergency situations, bystanders do not help the person in need. They found that in Genovese’s situation, most witnesses saw that there were many others watching. The responsibility to help, and also the blame of not helping, was spread out amongst the witnesses.
However, there are some things that can break the bystander effect. When one person decides to help the other human in distress it is very likely that other people will join in to helping them. Another thing, if this person dressed up in something modern that an important person would wear to a business meeting or a fancy party. What happens is the people think that because that person is dressed up like them they are “One of us” and they also think that it could be them in distress. In other words, they have more empathy for people they view as similar to them.
However, “The Cult of Domesticity” is refuted and supported in “High Noon”. “High Noon” shows Amy Kane going against submissiveness by refusing to stay with Will, reaching out of her domestic sphere when she joins the gun fight, and her religious piety through her strong religious views. “Story of An Hour” depicts married women as being controlled and wanting to break away which refutes “The Cult of Domesticity”. In “The Bride Comes to Yellow Sky”, married women are depicted as not being individuals.
Bystander behaviour can generally be described as the actions people take when they witness an emergency situation in a public place. There have been many studies on bystander behaviour, this essay will explore two approaches to explain this behaviour. It will look at the experimental method performed by Latané and Darley and at the discourse analysis done by Levine. First the essay will describe and outline the methods.after that it will examine the similarities as well as the contrast between those techniques. Latané and Darley did their research on bystander behaviour in the aftermath of the murder case of Catherine `Kitty´ Genovese,which happened in the Suburbs of New York in 1964.
Every day many of us are faced with the question, “Should I step in and help?”. Some of us immediately think yes and jump in to help, while others believe it is better to keep walking. The bystander effect happens when a person does not stop and help because they think someone else will. In these situations, some people stand up and respond to the crisis, because they are not worried about what will happen to them, but what will happen to the person in crisis instead. In the novel Night and the poem “The Hangman”, the bystander effect took place because people were afraid to bring attention to themselves.
The dinner itself is very uncomfortable due to a lack of water and high room temperature. The twins ask to be excused and run away from the residence. Everybody creates search parties to go look for them. The police are notified about the twins running away. The father is as well.
Two major approaches when studying bystander behaviour are discourse analysis and experimental method. Latané & Darley and Levine have contributed to psychological study into this matter, using these different methods of experimentation to reach conclusions regarding the bystander effect. This essay will begin by describing the different uses of evidence in both methods. Furthermore, it will discuss what these methods have in common, for they equally attempt to understand why bystander behaviour occurs, and the reasons that they differ. It will examine why each method is a useful way of analysing human behaviour, and the similarities in the limited demographics used by these particular psychologists.
The actual narrative of the film instead, turned out to be more about when the dish was devised and where it came from specifically. This film while most of it is shot in present time, dealt more in historical content of the narrative. Interviewing scholars, and restaurant owners who have served the dish for years helped move the narrative forward. A few other interesting characters were also interviewed.
The indifferent group really has no opinion for or against polygamy. If a number of consenting adults want to enter a relationship and live this lifestyle that is their choice. This is most likely a lifestyle the average person would not commit to, but they also see no harm in it if it does not affect them personally. This group may even be a little curious on how the family runs the day to day operations, how each wife interacts with each other, or how it effects the children. Yet, some in this group do have a valid concern about the
Fleur Beale wants readers to understand that no matter what others think, what others talk about doesn’t matter as you should do what you think is right. The main character, Hannah Carstairs was sure she didn’t want to get married but everyone who knew her believed she should. Despite the talk about this and disapproval from others she didn’t give up her opinions and stayed strong with what she believed. This is important as often in life we will have an original opinion which is good but courage is sticking with that opinion even when it is obvious that others disagree and not changing that because of this mater. A movie that is similar to this book is Divergent.
The bystander effect is defined as the effect in which one person feels unobligated to help a situation because there are other people around. An example of this is the movie is when the two black guys in the stolen vehicle hit a man and because the other is present they feel it is best for their sake to stand by and run away from the man they just hit. This behavior shown towards the man who was hit is discourteous and occurred because the two men did not feel inclined to help the man they hit because the other was present. Defensive attribution is the tendency to blame the victim for the crime and is another aspect of social psychology found in the film Crash. One example of this in the film is the same example as stated before; when the two black men hit the pedestrian with a vehicle they stole.
The bystander effect states that during an occurrence or a crisis, the more observers there are, the less
Whereas in a crowd, there are many people who have the potential to help but don’t because, they believe someone else in the crowd will (Feist and Rosenberg, 2015). There is also the fact that people are getting misinterpretations based on the acts of others. If no one is doing anything, then there maybe is no emergency. This is an example of informative social influence (Feist and Rosenberg, 2015). Another factor of the bystander effect can be the cost-benefit analysis.