The education sector in general has been hampered by a lot of problems that need solutions from all possible sources. Possible solutions are likely to come from the government, the school itself, or even parents. Problems facing individual schools are likely to be solved by the schools themselves. The solutions from the school can only be witnessed after organizational restructuring. Of many of the problems that are witnessed in the educational sector, this article seeks to narrow down and describe poor academic performance in schools. The paper seeks to analyze a major problem in education, which is the United States government’s role in threatening to punish schools that continue to show dismal academic performance. It will achieve this by …show more content…
A decision making process that is likely to raise some concerns is the personal tactic of decision making. This is where the school principal makes all the decisions in the school. As a result, teachers feel discouraged and unmotivated (Wong, Ormiston, & Tetlock, 2011) .Through scenarios like these ones, good teachers are likely to seek transfer letters, contributing to poor academic performance in the school. Dysfunctional structures are as a result of the poor decision making by the school leader, who in this case is the principal.
Possible solutions to the problem of poor academic performance in schools begins with a proper plan that aims to restructure the school’s organizational arrangement. The organizational arrangement mostly focuses on the leadership structures in the school narrowing down to the whole process of decision making (Owens, & Valesky, 2011). A good solution can only result if all the stakeholders are involved in the decision making process. To agree on how to enhance the school performance, the school principal and the teachers have to agree on the ways in which students can be helped to achieve better
…show more content…
A few problems related to organizational decision making is that a lot of time is wasted and on some occasions, no results are realized. The waste of time comes with the fact that a lot of committees have to be formed to enable everyone to get involved. Some of the committees formed may be irrelevant and a waste of time. On the brighter side, organizational decision making preserves the culture of the school as opposed to the personal form of decision making (Owens & Valesky, 2011). In this case, good decision making structures can have a positive impact on the performance of the school.
In organizational decision making structures, all school leaders are involved in the decision making process. The participation of all members brings about a higher level of satisfaction in relation to the solutions made, simply because everybody was part of the process. New schedules and rules agreed upon to improve academic performance are positively embraced by the
It seems that governments in the United States are having difficulties meeting the needs of the people with the current resources allotted to them. Government has the task of disturbing revenues to programs that act in the public interest. At times, programs, such as education, are underfunded. Schools then confronted with the challenge of funding beneficial with insufficient revenue and finding alternative methods of funding. More often, we are seeing schools asking students to bare the financial burden in order to participate.
The article “School vs. Society in America’s Failing Students” (2015), by Eduardo Porter reveals the debate surrounding the reasoning behind the failure of America’s educational system. Porter efficiently utilizes logos to fulfil his purpose of informing his audience of the multiple sides of the situation. Porter uses logos to fairly and thoroughly showcase both sides of the discussion. He begins his article by introducing the situation through a declaration of statistics of America’s ranking in the PISA standardized tests in math, reading, and science. He then presents Professor Martin Carnoy’s beliefs that “socioeconomic deficits impose a particularly heavy burden on American schools” and once these social statuses are adjusted for, the American educational system will
Although on paper our schools seem to meet the needs of everyone, the U.S. school is nowhere near perfect, and reforms and actions need to continue to be implemented.
Inappropriate actions included strict authority, force, fear and pain (The Struggle For Public Schools). Other gaps proved severe in performance of elementary students. For instance, before the education reform areas of less focus on homework and instruction, poor test scores, lower academic performances than competitors in other countries occurred (Galens). Unquestionably, children did not perform well with the youth education system in place. *The final
In Carl Singleton’s article, “What Our Education System Needs is More F’s,” he argues that students aren’t receiving the failing grades they deserve. School systems are to blame for the lack of quality in America’s education. No other recommendation for improvement will succeed. The only way to fix the American education system is to fail more students. According to Singleton, the real root of the issue is with the parents.
Many people think that most American schools are satisfactory. That is far from what is actually happening. The harsh reality is that schools that are unsatisfactory do exist. In Jonathan Kozol’s “Fremont High School”, he points out the flaws of a high school located somewhere in Los Angeles. This helps shine light on differences in the quality of education in various areas of the country.
n “The Failure of American Public Education” (February 01 1993), John Hood explains the sundry perspectives on the American education system. Hood tactfully uses cause and effect to demonstrate the viewpoints of a myriad of individuals regarding American schools and their approaches to effectively educating students; he explains how “free-market thinkers believe that applying market competition to the public schools will solve many of America’s educational problems” (Hood) ; “critics believe that public education reforms fail because they are compromised or sabotaged by the education lobbies—teacher associations, administrators, and the legislators in their pockets” (Hood) and “many conservatives believe that American public education is in
1. What are the primary issues in this scenario and what information is Principal Miller likely to need in order to demonstrate appreciation for and sensitivity to the diversity in the school community? The primary issues are the quality of instruction received by all students and Principal Miller’s lack of knowledge regarding the political, social, economic, and cultural context of the community. To gain a better understanding of the issues, Mr. Miller will need to collect and review data.
As leaders, it will be incumbent upon us to ensure these disagreements are handled fairly and equitably and to the benefit of all parties involved. We must weigh the evidence carefully, consider all options, and make the decision that is in the best interest of the school community. Sometimes, our choices may not be popular, but if they are made with integrity and purpose, we can get buy-in from all stakeholders. Staff members need to know that their concerns will be acknowledged, validated, and addressed.
The current plight of the American education system is partly due to a serious shortage of teachers who can effectively instruct the students on the material and skills expected of their grade level and beyond. One reason may be because the current requirements for all teacher candidates are quite soft, as in many states, candidates are subject to only a number of requirements, including a bachelor’s degree, the completion of teacher training, an exam of school content knowledge, and other certifications (“Teacher Certification and Licensing Guide”). The most likely reason, however, of low-quality instruction in school is due to an inherent lack of intrinsic motivation and discipline in many teachers to do their best for students to excel in school and life, and if the teachers are too lazy and incompetent to do their jobs, students are more likely to follow that example and do so likewise in their own lives. This is shown in a chapter from Theodore R. Sizer’s book Horace's Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School called “What High School Is,” where a story is told from the perspective of Mark, a typical high school student in the United States, including
The text states, “The superintendent did have enormous power of initiative in virtually all matters concerning the schools: the appointment of staff, the selection of textbooks, plans and contracts for buildings, the determination of the curriculum, and normal decisions about everyday running of the schools” (159). When examining the formal education of our current educational institutions, it is evident that the power structure lies with superintendents, school boards and principals who share expectations on how classrooms should be run as well as decision making for the betterment of the institution and students. Overall, formal education has evolved and will continue to evolve as educators search for their perception of the “one best system” for their students. Throughout the history of education, power structure and social class matters have influenced how educators implement regulations, interact with community members and fellow educators, but most importantly, the education of students so that they may be instilled with the skills and confidence to further themselves as
As for the executive elite school, it emphasized the development of the students’ analytical intellectual abilities. Students were encouraged to reason through a problem, and to produce work that was of top academic quality. Overall, the “hidden curriculum” of school work causes students to
Employees are allowed to make their own decisions but the leaders are still responsible for the final outcome. It is because of employee confidence that there is no requirement for central coordination. More recently, Judge and Piccolo (2004) indicated that that leaders who scored high on laissez-faire leadership scales avoid making decisions, hesitate in taking action, and are absent when
There is great variation in accountability systems. In some, information on student achievement is published in league tables, and sanctions, including monetary rewards, are attached to performance for schools and teachers. The use of monetary rewards, however, has proved controversial, and usually has not lasted very long. Furthermore, rewarding successful schools at the expense of increasing resources to schools that are failing would not contribute to overall school improvement.
Several studies have been done to identify problems that affects student’s academic performance. The students’ academic performance depends on a number of socio-economic factors like students’ presence of trained teacher in school, teacher-student ratio, attendance in the class, sex of the student, family income, mother’s and father’s education, , and distance of schools (Amitava Raychaudhuri,