Analytical Paragraph In the article, “It is Expensive to be Poor,” author Barbara Ehrenreich effectively uses causes and effects to prove that poverty is expensive. The causes and effects are effective because they support her article, and they help the reader understand the problem. Some of the examples of causes and effects in the article are how the war on poverty slowed down due to lack of funds, and the war in Vietnam. The article also included examples such as not enough earning from jobs so people were not able to switch to other jobs, and a varying work schedule didn’t allow people to have a second job. The causes and effects showed the reader why the war on poverty was slowed down and the reason behind the occurrence of poverty.
In addition, she could have made the novel more interesting if she would have explored what it is like to be homeless. This brings to the conclusion that the experiment would have been better off if she would of set no conditions. The majority of individuals who are part of the low-wage workforce do not have the opportunity of having accommodations like Ehrenreich did. Leaving these utilities out of her project,Ehrenreich would of given the reader a better insight to how difficult it is to live on minimum wage, as well as being in
another self-strategy was the alliance exchange making farmers focus on a central purchasing house. all these actions failed because farmers were too poor or in debt due to prior sales. the system was poorly capitalized, prices were too high for farmers, they ended up being victims to business causing the uprising of boycotts. the subtreasary plan succeed this plan helped farmers by giving them loans in order to grow and sell crops. The back and forth communication and strategies not only lead the famers to a political path but it also began the start of the populist party.
The first-hand account Ehrenreich provides as a low-wage workers may not be enough to warrant the audience’s trust in her claims, so she sprinkles in actual studies/statistics to make her claims more convincing. She states “Preamble Center for Public Policy was estimating that the odds against a typical welfare recipient’s landing of a job at such a ‘living wage’ were about 97 to 1” (3). Ehrenreich’s main point is that it is very hard to get by with minimum wage, especially without any help from friends or family. Referencing a reputable source that follows her claims made through her experience makes the narration seem more trustworthy. In addition, Ehrenreich notes “rents…have to be less than 30 percent of one’s income to be considered ‘affordable’” and then cites “Housing analyst Peter Dreier” who reports that the majority of poor renters spend “50 percent of their income on shelter” (170).
Terri Babbage wrote an article called, “Dignity for the Workers”. She talked about the reality that workers in low earning jobs have to face, how difficult it is for them to meet all there needs. There wages are low and they dont get much time off. Terris’ essay shows sympathy saying, “We cannot allow this ruthless exploitation to continue, especially since the companies know they are doing wrong”. (Babbage 12) The big corporations know that the pay is to low but they are still meeting the minimum wage requirement so nothing will
Mistaking Poverty Throughout the text, “Changing the Face of Poverty,” Diana George is certainly precise when claiming that the common representations of poverty limit our understanding of it. She expresses that most of our knowledge of poverty becomes misinterpreted due to advertisements, media, and images. Consequently, the way that we look at poverty focuses around that in which is in third-world countries, but poverty can be anywhere, even in your backyard. American citizens are the audience for the text, because Americans typically portray as being wealthy, happy people who are oblivious to the poverty-stricken areas surrounding them. Diana George’s, “Changing the Face of Poverty” expresses to its readers that non-profit organizations such as Habitat for Humanity, utilize unauthentic pictures as a way to convince the public that there are people out there that need help.
Americans never seem to be fulfilled, and they end up spending their lives trying to fill an endless desire. Although, in the end of Paul Piff’s T.E.D. Talk, he explains his last case study. In this study, people are shown a video about childhood poverty. In Piff’s discoveries, rich people were just as willing to help out an underprivileged person just as much as ordinary people were.
She mentions a few problems with prison systems such as; how they are mistreated as slave-works and how much money is wasted in these prisons. Although it is commonly assumed that the prison systems are helping society, in fact, Goldman argues that it is hurting it because it is not helping the prisoners change their bad behaviors. The prisoners are only being used to help benefit the state by being subjected to harsh labor and being in an income that goes to the state. Problem claim: One of the claims that Goldman argues is that the prisoners are being mistreated and used for cheap labor. She states in her book, how the prisoners are being used to do jobs that no normal individual would do if they had their own feel will.
This part of the book supports Nielsen’s claim on how only those who are seen to have the ability to provide an advancement in their world are able to advance themselves in society. Nielsen further supports her claim by explaining how those in this new compound are even more divided from those in the Pleeblands and she also explains how it is seen in the book how Jimmy’s mother doesn’t agree with the way things a run and how she is the only one who notices the “…the social injustices that are taking place…” (Line
This all can result the audience to feel empathic towards not only Ehrenreich, but others who are forced to work under these conditions. Ehrenreich’s narrative proves to be compelling and successfully is able to get the audience to recognize the hard work of low income individuals. Furthermore, she addresses a common misconception among Americans, that those living in poverty are not hard working people,
A mass body of people pointed out what they liked and disliked. Throughout history, one can clearly see change is made through citizen’s inputs that eventually makes an impact on the quality of life. During the Progressive Era, America was portrayed as the “best country” in the world. However, no one bothered to bring up the fact that one out of three people were starving to death or only six out of ten children were attending school due to financial instability in American households. The government was well aware of the poverty issues but they did not make an effort to help the people.
The writer Michal Harrington once wrote about the young population who were marginally educated and suffered from social disadvantages such as the possibility of being displaced from a job and received a low pay. Such group as described still remain today, and the only difference is that they have increased in number. There is a need for the government to address this predicament, and President Obama suggested the implementation of a more innovative strategy. As presented, the solution to both the social and economic problems can be solved through new technologies and educational programs. Unfortunately, there are only a few initiatives that benefited the poor and low-income American families as the programs sponsored by private foundations are aimed at helping the more academically skilled.