BUSINESS
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis:
1. Medium barriers to entry: the new entrant does not need to carry high fixed cost to run the business and could lease airplanes from third party. But the congestion of Hong Kong International airport limited the entry.
2. Low threat of substitutes: For travelling in the long distance for a short period of time, airplane is still the best option for consumers to choose.
3. High bargaining power of suppliers: The airline industry relies on few suppliers for aircraft (Boeing vs. Airbus), energy (crude oil), and human resources (pilots and flight attendants).
4. Low bargaining power of buyers: The customer base for Cathay pacific is expanding as a result of larger demand from Mainland China and premium
…show more content…
Stable Growth Period and Growth Rate: Constrained by capacity and congestion of Hong Kong International airport, it is not easy for Cathay Pacific to enter into high growth model until the completion of new runway around 2024. Therefore, we predict that earnings will growth at 2% on yearly basis after 5 years, which is consistent with GDP growth in Hong Kong. Valuation would be changed if Cathay Pacific could benefit from new runway in the future.
DCF VALUATION
Key Assumptions:
1. Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE): We use DCF of FCFE to value equity of Cathay Pacific mainly due to the considerations that it is hard to accurately estimate the value of complex cross holdings, which consists of listed companies (e.g. Air China) and private companies (e.g. Hong Kong Airport Services).
FCFE=Net income-(Capital expenditure- Depreciation)-Payment of loans and obligations under finance lease+ New financing-Change in non-cash working capital
2. Capital Expenditure: Based on estimate of Cathay Pacific, capital expenditure will be around 15 to 16 billion HKD in 2016, which is assumed to be constant for coming years.
3. Payment of Loans and Obligations under Financing Leases: based on estimation disclosed in 2015 annual report
4. New Financing: based on average three-year financing record.
5. Estimated Cost of
…show more content…
Market risk premium: Average of estimates made by NYU and Bloomberg up to Apr. 2016-8.19%
C. Beta: regression on stock return against market return (Heng Seng Index, Apr. 20106-Apr.2016)-adjusted beta=1.029(raw beta=1.043) 6. Growth rate: previous year reinvestment rate and ROE contribute to current year growth rate
RELATIVE VALUATION
Key Assumptions:
1. Comparable company: Selection is based on business nature, geography and financial conditions.
2. Ration selection: P/E and P/B are both commonly used in relative valuation. Price refers to last price on 27/4/2015. Earning refers to trailing 12 month net profit as of 31/12/2015 and book value is based on equity book value on 31/12/2015.
GLOSSARY
Available tonne kilometers (“ATK”): Overall capacity, measured in tonnes available for the carriage of passengers, excess baggage, cargo and mail on each sector multiplied by the sector distance.
Available seat kilometers (“ASK”): Passenger seat capacity, measured in seats available for the carriage of passengers on each sector multiplied by the sector distance.
Revenue passenger kilometers (“RPK”): Number of passengers carried on each sector multiplied by the sector
TO: Dr. Jim Turner FROM: Tyler Mead DATE: October 20, 2015 SUBJECT: New England Seafood Company Risk Analysis Overview: Accompanying this memo is a risk analysis I have conducted for New England Seafood Company. The risk analysis I have conducted will show which weighted average cost of capital would be best to use in evaluating the project along with how New England Seafood Company could utilize the land if the project is accepted. A 10% cost of capital will result in a positive net present value but the coefficient of variation will be much higher than New England’s average coefficient of variation. A lower or higher cost of capital could under or over value the project and risks involved.
Conversely, Nordstrom has been able to produce value in the market, which is reflected in their high market-to-book ratio. Because of this, investors using these ratios will be more likely to seek equity in Nordstrom’s rather than
In spite of the fact that Disney is included in a wide range of commercial ventures, the industry it fits in with in this particular case is the film distribution industry. As a first stride to assessing Disney 's present situation in the business, we conducted the Porter 's 5 Forces Analysis demonstrated below. •Power of Buyers: The customers in the film distribution industry allude to theaters and retailers that help movies through showings, DVDs, Blu-ray, and so forth. Despite the fact that retailers and theatres settle on a definitive choice of which motion pictures they should to buy, because of the distributor’s size, brand acknowledgment, high client loyalty, bargaining power for retailers and theatres are limited. Client 's
Porter’s Five Forces Porter’s Five Forces framework is to identify the level of competition within the industry and to determine the strengths or weaknesses which can utilise to strengthen the position. The framework consist of five elements: threat of entry, bargaining power of supplier, bargaining power of buyer, threat of substitutes and industry rivalry. Forces Analysis Implication Threat of new entrant Low Threat Diversified of product There are high demand of furniture and electrical appliance.
Market Structure - Oligopoly Oligopoly is a market structure whereby a few number of firms owns a lion’s share in the market. This market structure is similar to monopoly, except that instead of one firm, two or more firms have control in the market. In an oligopoly, there are no upper limits to the number of firms, but the number must be nadir enough that the operations of one firm remarkably influence and affects the others (Investopedia, 2003). The Walt Disney Company is categorized under an oligopoly market structure.
Another aspect of Porter’s Five Forces model is the threat of substitution, or how easy it would be for another company to take over the present business by innovating in some way. The threat of substitution is low but still present in the trucking industry. Due to the fact that a large majority of freight moved in the United States is moved by truck, it would be difficult to shift to a different mode of transportation. However, there are still other methods of travel that can be used, for example freight can be moved by airplane or by train within the United States. These alternative modes of transportation tend to be more expensive though, meaning it makes more sense for a company to simply purchase the services of a trucking company.
For worldwide airline industry, opportunities can emerge from new client expectations, items, business sector structures or regulatory
Another socio-cultural factor is the fear of terrorist attacks. Example would be the recent ISIS attacks in France, Russia etc. With terrorist bombing, airline companies are affected by the number of passengers traveling overseas. This could cause a drastic change to Rolls Royce’s income. Urban countries that are affected by overcrowding of air-craft are asking for larger aircraft as larger aircrafts are more powerful.
Each of the forces is determined how competitive in that industry as well as the structure of the industry. Porter’s five forces factors are consists of competitive rivalry, the threat of new entrants, the threat of substitutes, bargaining power from
Hong Kong Dragon Air is Hong Kong-based international airline, belonging to of the Cathay Pacific Group. The airline was established in 1985, and operates a fleet of narrow-body A320s and A321s, which were both powered by V2500 engines manufactured by International Aero Engines AG (“IAE”) for both passenger and cargo service to destinations to destinations across the Asia-Pacific region, and China. Their vision is to be the World’s best regional airline serving China and beyond. Their missions; places emphasis on safety and operational excellence with customer focus. The airline seeks to embrace innovation by implementing ideas that improve their business.
This theory is based on the concept that there are five forces that determine the competitive intensity and attractiveness of a market. Porter 's five forces help to identify where power lies in a business situation. This is useful both in understanding the strength of an organization 's current competitive position, and the strength of a position that an organization may look to move into. Strategic analysts often use Porter’s five forces to understand whether new products or services are potentially profitable. By understanding where power lies, the theory can also be used to identify areas of strength, to improve weaknesses and to avoid mistakes.
The Five Competitive Forces of Industry will influence prices, costs and investment (Porter, 1980). The potential retaining of customers, profitability of a holiday inn can be determined by being aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the hotel industry. (Figure 2.2: Porter’s Five Forces Model (Source: Adapted after Porter,2008) Porter’s 5 model helps in success of Holiday inn between suppliers and buyers. Giving customers the service they are looking for, acquire customers, retain customers and looking externally how the competitors are doing is very important. To ignore the power of customer relationship is not an option.
Porter’s five forces interact to shape the competitive landscape facing port authorities and port service providers. The 5 forces are stated below; 1. The rivalry among existing competitors 2. The threat of new competitors 3. The potential for global substitutes 4.
Porter’s five forces model To analyse the microenvironment facing United Biscuits in China, Porter’s five forces model is selected to provide an understanding of the competitive forces, to determine the competitive position of the company and profitability within the biscuit industry whilst offering a framework for predicting and influencing competition over time (Porter, 2008, p.80). The findings are explained below: Threat of new entrants • The high capital cost required for investing in developing distribution, sales network and acquiring production equipment could deter new entrants. The barriers are high when capital is necessary for unrecoverable expenditures such as marketing and product development capability which is difficult for new entrants to succeed in the short-term (Euromonitor, 2014; Porter, 2008, p.81).
3.2 Industry conditions (Porter 's Five Forces Analysis) Five forces which would impact an organization 's behavior in the market. Understanding the nature of these forces provides organizations the required insights to enable them to formulate the appropriate strategies to be successful in their market (Thurlby, 1998). 3.2.1 Threat of new entrants (high entry barriers) High capital investment for competitor entry into telecommunication industry. Companies in this industry maintain development, spend fairly large amount of capital on network equipment and incurred high fixed costs. Besides, technologies are also considered as barriers for new companies to enter the market.