Describe The Pros And Cons Of De-Extinction

Supporters of de-extinction reason that by studying resurrected species first hand, scientists can learn the underlying causes of extinction and the role that humans played in the destruction of both the extinct species and their natural habitats. The idea is that researchers will be able to develop countermeasures that will restore the earth’s ecosystem to its original state.This counter argument is not valid, however, for two important reasons. According to Strayer, “First because we’ve been changing our world so rapidly, a de-extinguished species won’t be restored to its former ecosystem, but to a different, sometimes radically different ecosystem” (Strayer). This statement illustrates that the damage caused by humans may very likely have cumulative effects that have occured over many centuries; therefore, it is not reasonable to assume that all of these cumulative effects can be repaired by bringing back one species at a time. It would not be possible to recreate the exact circumstances of the earth’s ecosystems at a specific point in time because of differences in the role of species in the environment, the condition of the environment itself, and the present and future impacts of humans.

Those products aren’t like the ones we use, they have different types of chemicals and they try them on the animals to see if it will affect us. Animals testing should not occur because killing an animal is not helping us It’s messing up the world. Animals aren’t something that we could manipulate they are living creatures that have feelings just like us. Humans wouldn’t like to be in cages or laboratories right? Animal testing is cruel because scientists do many horrible tests on the animals.

Nothing is wrong with bringing a terrifying hairy 6 ton mammoth back from the dead, right? I believe that raising extinct species from the dead is a dreadful idea. Many examples are from disease carriers to environment changing. To start, “Animal welfare: People could be exploiting animals for solely human purposes, and may cause individuals of the de-extinct species harm,” stated by Breanna Draxler author of 5 Reasons to Bring Back Extinct Animals (And 5 Reasons Not To). This was to shows how some of these animals would be hunted if they were come back to life.

This means that animals will eventually become extinct, if the scientists do not stop soon. Those on the other side may argue that animals don 't have rights, but it stills is cruel and

The initial catalyst for the loss of the black footed ferret population was poisoning efforts made in the early 1900s. The target of the poisoning was the prairie dog population, which in turn caused a sharp decline in the black footed ferret population. The most common poisons used by North Dakota residents are zinc phosphide and Rosal. Most people dislike prairie dogs, so they use poison to terminate them. This decline in the prairie dog population in turn affects the black footed ferret population.

In this article, the focusing point is on endangered species. I will state the ways animals can be in dangers. I will identify the pros and cons of endangered specie act in U.S. I will be investigating the drawbacks if a specie is extinct… Endangered specie is the species which are going to be extinct soon. We all know that there are lots of animals we are losing right now, but what’s the exact number of the endangered specie.

The collapse of the marine ecosystem would result in the a massive amount of loss in fish stocks, resulting in the loss of business and the starvation of many people around the world that rely on fish as their major supply of food. (The main cause of overfishing is large fishing companies

Millions of animals and birds cannot withstand such environmental changes; their populations become smaller and, eventually, disappear altogether from the face of the earth. Clumping of debris in the ocean is one of the biggest problems of the world, as it is far from people, no one takes it seriously. So, this research paper is dedicated to such problem as

To start off, I think animal testing is wrong. It may benefit OUR lives, but it doesn’t for the animals being tested on. It is cruel, inhumane, and sometimes isn’t necessary for the product. There are alternatives to this and it can cause much pain and suffering to the animals. In my opinion, animal testing is wrong and here are my reasons why I think so.

Invasive species are causing harm and killing the rest of the native plants and animals.The insect,the ash borer, deadly to trees, has threatened millions of ash in the Midwest in recent years. This bug is originally native to Asia. Invasive species are plants, animals, or pathogens that are non-native (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and whose introduction causes or is likely to cause harm. One invasive plant is Kudzu. Kudzu is a vine that climbs over trees and bushes and grows so rapidly that it kills plants by keeping them from getting |any sunlight.