A date that has gone down infamously in America’s history is the tragic event that occurred on September 11, 2001. This date was a turning point in the world, and many changes could be seen, such as the addition of the TSA in airports and increased security. However, one of the lesser known effects was the sense of fear that was unconsciously instilled within our communities. Today, this fear is represented through our heightened awareness towards terrorism, and the increased distance we tend to place between ourselves and our fellow community members. While 9/11 was a day most noted for its horrific display of terror and the loss of many lives, it was also the day that we, as a nation, lost our sense of security and replaced it with a sense …show more content…
In fact, according to a study of attitudes towards Muslim Americans post 9/11, after 9/11 “the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported a 1,700 percent increase of hate crimes against Muslim Americans between 2000 to 2001” (Khan). While discrimination towards Muslim Americans existed before, after 9/11 the general public’s view of Muslim Americans rapidly declined and resulted in an increase in the Muslim-terrorist stereotype as well as many individuals having to face unwanted hostility. In a study on microaggressions directed towards Muslim Americans, a participant shared, “’A truck driver said to my mom, ‘Say hi to Osama,”’ presuming that because she was Muslim she was associated with terrorism (Nadal). While in another case, a participant described how because his name was Osama, his seventh grade teacher “accidentally” called him Osama bin Laden during attendance, “but [he knew] she was doing it on purpose [because] she kept doing it over and over” (Nadal). These subtle actions are forms of aggressions based out of contempt, hated, and fear towards Muslim Americans. Similarly, since 9/11, there has been an increase in the monitoring and surveillance of Muslim Americans. In a study on the emotional and behavioral responses Muslim Americans have to …show more content…
As a result, the media that cover these events dictate what and how they are shared. However, it only helps to feed our sense of fear towards terrorism as well as fuel the Muslim stereotype. In fact, according to a study on deconstructing the terrorism- news media relationship, “terrorists use media as a tool to gain increased coverage and communicate their message,” but sometimes the news does it for them (Ross). For example, in the UCLA shooting, where two men were killed in a murder-suicide, the news’ portrayal of the situation led many to believe that there were multiple attackers instead of just the one. While this may not directly convey terrorists’ message, it helps to spread unnecessary fear of terrorism in our communities. However, if we were to instead reach out to local mediums, like the news or paper, and spread basic information about Islam, it would possibly have the reverse effect and be a faster more effective way in changing the general public’s perception of Muslim Americans to be more
Do you agree with the notion that the United States Government has seriously discriminated against Muslims in post 9/11 era? In this paper I will argue whether the United States Government has seriously discriminated against Muslims in post 9/11 era or not. On this topic, I chose to agree with the notion that yes, Muslims have been discriminated against by the United States Government especially after the events of 9/11. First, I will argue that the United States Government has implemented procedures and regulations against Muslims that violate constitutional law in response to the events of 9/11.
“The world changed on September 11, 2001. We learned that a threat that gathers on the other side of the earth could strike our own cities and kill our own citizens. It is an important lesson; one we can never forget. Oceans no longer protect America from the dangers of this world. We are protected by daily vigilance at home.
After 911, muslims have become a target for racial violence and religious discrimination and if the government
Harlow and Dundes (2004) surveyed 403 college students only weeks after the 9/11 attack and asked them about their thoughts on 9/11 in hopes of seeing how united they stood. Following the survey, researchers meet with two groups of students, one group was made of white students and the other of black students in an open discussion meeting. To ensure that everyone felt safe in their group, a black researcher was assigned to talk to the black students and a white researcher was assigned to talk to the white students. After talking with the two groups, the researchers found that there were many differences between the groups in terms of patriotism and their views of the terrorists. One main difference between the groups was that the white students took the attack much more personally than the black students.
Have you ever seen something so horrifying, so disheartening, that you couldn’t even bring yourself to look away? Well, that was most of the population on September 11, 2001. Most were absolutely stunned, not able to even process what they just witnessed. In “From Terror to Hope,” by Kristin Lewis, we learn about a young girl who witnessed the September 11 attacks. Not only were thousands of innocent lives taken on that day, but soon after, a certain religion called Islam was attacked.
For this reason, terrorist organizations like, ISIS, rely on the media to show their awful killings. In Douglas Kellnar's, " 9/11, Spectacles of Terror, and Media Manipulation: A Critique of Jihadist and Bush Media Politics," Kellnar discusses how the media aids terrorists groups by repeatedly showing the massacres that they commit. This was particularly true in the case of 9/11. These terrorist acts were the most documented event in history. The media constantly was burning images of planes hitting the twin towers and people jumping from burning buildings into their viewers brains.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ushered in a new era of security and governance in the United States. In response to these tragic events, the U.S. government enacted a series of laws and regulations with the aim of enhancing national security and preventing future acts of terrorism. While proponents argue that these measures have safeguarded the nation, there is growing evidence to suggest that the post-9/11 laws and regulations have had a hurtful impact on American society. This essay explores three key areas through which these policies have inflicted damage: the erosion of civil liberties, the cultivation of a culture of fear, and the disproportionate targeting of marginalized communities. By examining these facets, it becomes
Many Americans felt justice due to his death and united once again (MacFarlane). However, while the country was trying to unite, the problem of hate crimes against Arab Americans was increasing and Muslims were given a label as terrorists. To help with this problem, President Bush used a speech to “condemn domestic hate crimes against Arab Americans, who suffered from scattered violence throughout the United States after the attacks” (MacFarlane). This showed the laws and regulations that were being passed were in no way trying to assume any Arab American were a threat, but to punish those that needed to be.
When George W. Bush delivered his “Freedom at War with Fear” speech at the Congress on Sept 20th, 2001, America has just suffered from the single deadliest terrorist attack on US soil. Apart from the intention of establishing himself as a capable leader in times of crisis, Bush’s speech dealt primarily with how terrorism has trampled the very core of American values and how America should respond accordingly. Knowing that Americans were already raged about being attacked on their homeland (“our grief has turned to anger”) and the fact that many demanded actions (“and anger to resolution”), Bush’s general purposes was “strengthening commitment”; more specifically, to strengthen citizens’ and congressmen’s commitment to a long-term war on terror “until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated”. Throughout his speech, Bush extensively used common knowledge – universal beliefs and values shared by people of different cultural and religious background1 – to support his argument. He mentioned freedom, a value held highly by most Americans, thirteen times during the speech.
The attack on the World Trade Centre September 11th, 2001 marked the change in global attitudes towards the Arabs and Muslim communities. What Evelyn Alsultany discusses is the new portrayal of Arabs and Muslims in the media by referencing popular television series like “24” and “Sleeper Cell” in addition to analyzing news reports since this major event. Before the Cold War, Arabs and Muslims were stereotyped as rich oil sheiks surrounded by opulence in an exotic land, whereas during the Cold War when the United States gained a considerable amount of geopolitical power, the generalizations gradually became darker and more focused on terrorism, violence, and the oppression of women. The theme that Alsultany is choosing to elaborate in her introduction
Many say that 11 September 2001 was a start of a new era for muslims in the United states, as they became unfortunately targets of hate and racism from many.
In the wake of 9/11, concerns about international terrorism permeated public political discourse in the UK, with the focus largely resting upon measures that could be taken to prevent similar attacks from occurring in Britain. The identity of the perpetrators of 9/11 as Muslims has had a significant negative impact on the British Muslims, who now are seen as a threat and have been identified as the key problem in the fight against terrorism home and abroad. For example, not long after 9/11, a former British Home Secretary, David Blunkett, accused impoverished and radicalized British Muslims of indulging of alleged segregation and of not speaking English at home. Certainly, the 9/11 attacks have had a significant influence on the implementation
This present obsession is tinged with negative signifiers with the overall media's overwhelmingly negative portrayal of Islam and Muslims, depicting Muslims generally as awful, over the top, intolerant, or as fan and terrorists. These examples demonstrate the hugeness of the topic, which has significance for various countries in Asia and Africa where Muslims can be found. F. A. Noor battled that "Muslim character and the stresses of Muslims are dynamically being portrayed similarly as an oppositional justification that pits Islam
Many have stated that western politicians and their actions, both direct and indirect, regarding Middle East political turmoil and religion-based conflicts are what truly cemented anti-Muslim prejudice into the western stream of consciousness. Islamophobia is a problem that has plagued western society for decades, present in various forms and demonstrated in a multitude of ways. To many, Islamophobia has become a seemingly indestructible social construct in the western world. The research presented in this paper will examine the roll played by political rhetoric in the perpetuation of Islamophobia in western society, focusing primarily on American politicians and the global repercussions of their often divisive positions regarding Islam. Political
" This is a very good idea because it will open up discussion about the problems radical Islam causes and how to fix them. It is better for people to know the truth about radical Islam and the numbers than to be fooled by unreliable news sources. Furthermore, fixing the economy will help solve many problems because working long hours at a tedious job and getting paid little makes it easier for a person to be involved in crime be it radical Islam or otherwise. Inbreeding is one of the major problems mentioned previously, and the only way to fix it is if Muslims realize it is unhealthy and harmful to their children and to themselves because of the struggle of raising a mentally handicapped child, which will stain economies of countries to which the immigrates migrate to. There are many problems which are upon the Muslim community and there is no easy solution, and it is confounding to think people can protest things that are not relevant or helpful for example feminists in Sweden burned the equivalent of 13 thousand US dollars to protest women 's pay inequality by wasting money .