Post-Empiricism And Critical Rationalism

826 Words4 Pages
1. The difference between Post-Empiricism and Critical Rationalism: Critical Rationalism has been discussed to, as the system of falsification. A point is a form of rationalism insofar as it embraces knowledge (or other psychological state and capabilities) about some specific subject matter, drives from the use of reason or more commonly from the rational nature (Kuhn, 1970:231). Rationalism is the view that rational instincts are the most essential way of obtaining knowledge (Dick, 1993:53). whereas a Post-Empiricism is the desertion of firm empirical approaches by recent empiricists. A point is a form of empiricism insofar as it embraces knowledge (or other psychological state and capabilities) about some specific subject matter, drives from experience of that subject matter (Kuhn, 1970:231). Empiricism is the view that experiences, interpretations or sense data are the only or the greatest significant way of obtaining knowledge (Alston, 1988:257).  Examples related to education: Critical rationalism: educators practise the achievement of their tactics, to denote that the system following it is effective. The point that the policies they have practiced in a certain condition have twisted out to be effective proves very slight. Some cannot conclude greatly from a solo experimentation in a casual perspective just because a testing requires a constantly showing of some causative element (Popper, 1980:96). There is similarly the modification amongst what educators actually

More about Post-Empiricism And Critical Rationalism

Open Document