Postmodernism is a movement that was started in the late-20th-century that essentially focuses on the deconstruction and the undermining of institutions that possesses a tradition and an established reputation. Derrida’s deconstruction is interested in finding the hidden meanings of a text, or representations of any kind, which the author may have not intended it to have (Thompson 2004, p. 10). Such examples of which institutions that are the target of the postmodernist movement are the arts, literature and history—which consists as one of major themes of the postmodernist movement. Hence, the focal point of this essay will be the examination of the take of postmodernism on the subject of history, and its techniques, along with a close correlation …show more content…
This is relevant in how historians pen history, through the usage of interpretations of records. As Hutcheon states, the historical facts are a product of the interpretations of archival records and meanings that are given to them and how different perspectives will glean different meanings from the same events (2002, p. 54). This is further supported by Thompson as he explains that historians construct an account of historical representations that would be relatively convincing out of the records that are fragmented (2004, p. 29; Hutcheon 2002, p. 55; Evans 2002, p.2). It is the role of a teller—in this case, a historian—to give a particular meaning through gleaning a truth through the facts, as those facts are not able to present themselves in either form of narratives (Hutcheon 2002, p. 56). With interpretations and piecing together historical evidences to form meaning, this suggests that there is a certain sort of fictionalisation that goes into the method of how history is created and the ease of its readability raises the issue that historians would write history in a causal and linear fashion, almost so that it would read like a narrative with the implications that one thing would lead to another (Currie 1998, p. 79). As proclaimed by Alan Munslow: “The past is not discovered or found. It is created and represented by historians as a text.” (Evans 2002, p. 1). Combined this factor and the flaw of human beings’ inability to remain objective, this jeopardises the perception that history is a text that is free of biasness and that is ultimately neutral. This flaw is further supported by Greenblatt as he argues that the interpretations of historical representations can never be neutral or disinterred (1989 cited in Currie 1998, p. 88). It can also be
In History: A Very Short Introduction, author John Arnold states, “A historian should be like a lawyer: balancing conflicting accounts trying to establish the exact sequence of events, treating ‘witnesses’(documents) with dispassionate and
Novick states that while the typical understanding of a myth is something that is considered untrue or factual. He, on the other hand, views the idea of a myth as being a tool that can back historical objectivity as it works to rid historians and history of bias views of an event (Haskell, 3-4). Haskell states that his problem with Novick’s view of the definition of myth and objectivity. While Novick feels that objectivity shows a flaw, as a historian way of viewing and writing history from an opinionated stance, Haskell states that his view on the way Novick views the “myth of objectivity” is nothing more than a way for historians to “professionalize their discipline, enhance their dignity, and maximize their incomes” (Haskell,
This work guides the reader along a path of history that is often misconstrued
When thinking about history in the past, I have always believed that it was straightforward. I knew that if I wanted to know something, I had to find the sources that contained the information. I had never thought about how that information came to be or why the author chose to include the information that he did. Reading “The Strange Death of Silas Deane,” helped me to see that everything is not as straightforward as it seems, and in order for you to completely have a full picture of something, you need to know all the information that is surrounding it.
History is made from stories, stories that have been passed from generation to generation, eventually written down and recorded as a record. Most often History is written by the powerful, the victorious, and so facts can become twisted and history can grow to not truly reflect reality. In context, the winners of a game may justly say they won but intentionally leave out the penalties they took or the goals the other team scored. Similarly, this happens in history and so history must be revised upon the discovery of new facts and evidence to be able to do justice to the reality of events.
In the journal article “ Andrew Jackson versus the Historians”, author Charles G. Sellers explained the various interpretations of Jackson, from the viewpoint of Whig historians and Progressive Historians. These interpretations were based on the policies of Jackson. The Whig historians viewed the former president in a negative way. They considered him arrogant, ignorant, and not fit for being president. Sellers pointed out that it was not just because of “Jackson’s personality…nor was it the general policies he pursued as president”
History is a novel idea that has been a continuous idea throughout our time in class. We have gone over what history means to us, the students; as well as the authors and filmmakers we have studied. For me, before this class, History merely meant what we
Marie Hull Mr. Santini Global H 16 March 2015 How Religion in Rome Influenced the Development of Culture When most students and even some scholars study history, they view the past as just a series of facts and occurrences. And unfortunately, this is more or less the only way we are able to view history, simply because it has all happened many many years ago. But if we were able to look at history the way we look at our lives today, as not just a series of facts, but as a real era with real, living people, then we can gain an enormous amount of insight into what a certain period in history was truly like. We can begin to view history this way by studying how one event influences another.
Historical criticism strives to cognize a literary work by examining the social, cultural, and intellectual context that essentially includes the artist’s biography and milieu. Historical critics are more concerned with guiding readers through the use of identical connotation rather than analyzing the work’s literary significance. (Brizee and Tompkins). The journey of a historical reading begins with the assessment of how the meaning of a text has altered over time. In many cases, when the historical context of a text is not fully comprehended, the work literature cannot be accurately interpreted.
History books writers want to “soften” the past by rewriting the past by taking out important facts and details. No more false history. “The state of Texas voted to soften slavery roles.” (Isensee 2015). The reason why
Different kinds of credibility determines wether the historical narrative is fiction or not. This
History does not always convey the absolute truth. It offers only one side of the story. The strong and powerful voices always drown out the sounds of the weak and beaten. The winner’s word will always be taken over the loser’s. The content that lies within the textbooks was not written by the defeated.
The struggle for truth has arguably inspired and produced the greatest achievements in human history. Truth is only attainable through change, and to change is to be open to truth. History's overwhelming presence of biases and dogmatism has contributed to stifled progress and deprived men from pursuing the truth. To oppose a viewpoint contrary to one that is strongly believed in, is characteristic of humans; however, few are open to change, even when confronted by the status quo. If observed, further, it is found that views which substitute the consensus for an objective standard have certain consequences which few would accept.
1. Introduction Writing about a living phenomenon is a complicated effort especially when realizing it is a dynamic, changeable and heterogeneous structure. This happens when we try to study contemporary practices today, in postmodern era, which is definitely a special expression of specific moment. If Modernism, among others, tried to enforce authority, postmodernism brought anarchy. Many things found today in postmodernism can be traced back, transformed of course, in the main modern flows; dadaism, futurism, surrealism.
The criticism behind Catch-22’s Post-Modern Aantihero The postmodern movement in the late 20th century opened plenty of doors to new traits to culture, arts, and others. Among these was literature, which had a more cynical worldview in its works. Its abundance in irony, black humor, fragmentation and hyperrealism became some of its most distinguishable traits which made it an enjoyable literary movement. With the postmodern movement reaching its high peak with Catch-22, analysis of postmodern literature became inevitable. Some of the recurring themes in works of postmodern literature turned out to be paranoia, minimalism, metafiction and twists on heroism.