Power In The Prince Machiavelli

1164 Words5 Pages
Power is usually divided into two relating forces, consensual and coercive. These two defining dividends of power define the different types of leadership of which to truly define a leader as well as to manage and to maintain the subjugated as a factor of a primal exemplar of being the locus power. This study of power over another exemplifies the existence of The Prince. Machiavelli showcased the means of having power through the comparison of various leaders, which he called the "Prince", individually of course. These princes are the exemplars of power where one holds and other to take. More so, The Prince shows the cycle of power being lost and gained through the actions of every prince. With that, princes are the main actors to attain power or to lose power. In this paper, Machiavelli 's The Prince will be examined to study the actors, or princes, on the traits of power and the characteristics of a true prince for Machiavelli, while the study reiterates the examples or comparative facts that supported the work of reverence and of importance; it is to say, The Prince. The Princes are dependent variables. Machiavelli saw the prince as a person that is defined on what is at his own hands, principalities, armies, and so. These possessions can make the prince as powerful as he can be or as weak he shall be; nor be the definite strife for the downfall of his triumph. Princes are defined by the environment he has brought upon himself as well as the calamities that
Open Document