Men have the power Knowledge is power. Knowledge allows you to get an opportunity for advancement in very good jobs. Knowledge sets you in a higher social class. Knowledge enables you to be in control of other people. According its definition, power is the ability or capacity to do something or act in a particular way.
Coleman, The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (2000), pp. 108-130. "Power can be usefully conceptualized as a mutual interaction between the characteristics of a person and the characteristics of a situation, where the person has access to valued resources and uses them to achieve personal, relational, or environmental goals, often through using various strategies of influence."(p. 113). Another popular understanding by Articles from Breakthrough Consultancy,Ashton,Roundwood,Ireland suggests that “ power is the control, influence and exercise of authority over others; the ability to bend others to our will; to dominate people and situations for the purposes of self defence and self interest .
Power functions from all social relationships and is imposed throughout society. Sexuality therefore isn’t something that power crushes, but it’s a great channel of power. Sexuality then spreads through four major central points- the sexuality of children and women, the perverts and the married couples. The spreading of sexuality through these four points allows extension of power into the families, and thus throughout the
Power is an important tool for interaction among individuals and establishing authority in many aspects of life. Power is evident everywhere in the world. Bosses and their subordinates, teachers and peers and also government and its citizens. They are all expected to follow their dominant 's rules. Power can be seen as "The ability to influence or outright control the behaviour of people" (Power (social and political)/Wikipedia).
They defined a resource as “anything that one partner may make available to the other, helping the latter satisfy his needs or attain his goals” (Blood & Wolfe, 1960). Blood and Wolfe conceptualized couple (marital) power as the differential control of resources. They believed that socioeconomic, occupational, and educational resources influenced power relations most strongly, and therefore examined these particular resources in their studies. Ultimately, they believed that marital power is determined by the spouse who brings the greatest number of resources to the marriage. Their approach to the study of power became known as resource
Most members of society believe that power originates from individual belief and actions, however, humans derive self-power through the support of friends. Without guidance, individuals face problems on their own, abolishing the moral support brought by friends. During times of grief and despair, a friend’s company plays as the driving force that provides humans with the vital life skills to survive in society. The closest friends assist each other by motivating one another to take the right step, to reach for their goals, and shape them into their best selves. During the Great Depression in the 1930’s, bankers felt no impact, and remained oblivious to the anguish many families and individuals faced.
Human interaction is necessary for human beings to live a healthy life, and therefore, social groups are formed. People’s evolution of a relationship, from within a social group, into a friendship may be predicted because of the Big Five Personality Traits. Kleinman states in his book that, “The human mind develops from the interactions between people and society. He hypothesized that certain tools from culture, like speech and the ability to write were created so that people could interact with their social environment” (263). Without human interaction, the human brain remains underdeveloped, and once this occurs it may be irreversible (Kleinman 263).
Power among women has only recently received attention of social scientists. Recent literature has shown that among women, power motive interacts with sex-role conception or style of self-definition and other social roles (Steward & Winter, 1976). McClelland (1975) suggests that the traditional female role accentuates the power motivated women’s concern with building up her resources in order to be powerful (rather than to act powerfully) a concern was focused particularly on the body and its discipline. Women power can possibly be defined in terms of two dimension-attitude and belief-which are not mutually exclusive. It consists of the extent to which women express their likes and dislikes towards power behavior as well as their belief towards social system, i.e., when, how, over whom, for what goals and with what constrains it should be exercised.
Before going in further I would like to mention that, they acknowledge those to be just the “especially common and important ones” and the relationship between two actors is characterized by a series of qualitatively different variables which constitute the bases of power particular to each empirical case. Moreover, they make an important leap, that is not further explained in the book, from power as the ability of an individual A to enact an action towards another individual B in order to change their behavior, to power as B’s perception of the ability of A to act upon him. This opens the possibility for a division of power, based on the two components of the relationship, as actual power, or the real extent of the ability of actor A to enact upon actor B and change their behavior, and perceived power, or the assessment of actor B of the ability of actor A to enact upon him. This can only complicate out mission to asses the sources of power of a specific actor, but I believe it will provide a good framework for the conclusions as to allow a dual perspective on the results of this
Adopting of extensive classes in leaning and using of cooperative among the learners leads for positive outcomes and it can promote the creative thinking and having more though and experiences while the process of learning. According to Robert , E , Richard , R , Nelson , S , (2012) , Peer relationship leading for promote lots of positive outcomes , and support to achieving different thinking strategies . In Oman Air experiences and uses related to Peer relationship as strategy intended for learning in workplace positive use of Peer relationship as strategy planned for learning can leads for having more facilities in learning and to learn more in short time. focus on Peer relationship as strategy planned for learning leads to help for relationship and to learn more about different functions , the group can leads for having sharing in feeling and more motivation to achieve success. Peer relationship as strategy planned for learning to achieve effective commutation and more skills in communication among the group.