As a class, we have been reading The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. We have learned about the two different types of characters, pragmatic and principled. Cassius is a pragmatic leader, but Brutus is a principled leader. A pragmatic man is down-to-earth and solves problems, no matter the consequences. A principled leader, on the other hand, is someone who follows the rules, is honorable, and tries to please everyone. Cassius and Brutus are friends throughout the story; however, we learn that in comparison, they are very different. On one hand, Cassius, the pragmatic leader, wastes no time in solving problems. In this case, he has a problem with Caesar and the way that Caesar rules. Cassius, along with many others, believe …show more content…
This shows that Cassius is pragmatic because he is efficient in overcoming problems and situations and he will let nothing stop him. A second example of Cassius being pragmatic is that he said he would kill himself if Caesar became king. A pragmatic person will do whatever they have to do to deal with a problem, despite the consequences. Again, Cassius’ problem is Caesar, and even though it would result in death, he believes that being dead is better than Caesar becoming the ruler of Rome. An example of real life pragmatism is my cross country coach, Kristi Speer, I believe she takes on pragmatic qualities because she sets goals, and makes the team work hard to accomplish them. My coach is very good at setting her priorities straight and solving problems that may come up throughout the year. For example, Coach Speer makes her runners fill out journals that help to keep track of how they feel, how well they eat, the amount of time they sleep each night, and other health related topics. If a runner has a bad race or does not feel well, Coach Speer looks at the journals to figure out what went wrong. …show more content…
When Brutus was trying to decide whether or not to join the conspirators, he spent an entire night thinking about it. While debating this in his head, Brutus was trying to find a way to please everyone by analyzing every aspect of the situation. Principled people try to make everyone happy, just like Brutus was trying to do. He wanted to please the people of Rome and the other conspirators, but he did not want to betray his friend, Caesar. Principled people also spend ample time looking over, analyzing, and reviewing possible outcomes of situations and clearly, Brutus demonstrates this when he is deciding to join the conspirators. Another example of Brutus being principled is his reputation for being an honorable man. Throughout the play, Brutus’ honor is pointed out multiple times. In fact, Cassius believes that Brutus’ trustworthiness and honor will help to make the conspirators look better as a group. One of the key pieces to being a principled character is having an honorable reputation, and Brutus clearly demonstrates that he is one of the most honorable characters in the entire play. I see a real life example of a principled person when I look at a good family friend, Jordan. Jordan is studying to become a priest and receiving his Holy Orders. He is principled because he is a rule follower and strictly adheres to his moral beliefs. Jordan is a hard worker and very respected and
He was courageous when killing Caesar for the people of Rome. He had integrity when making unselfish decisions and joining the conspiracy only for the citizens. Lastly, he was kind when making choices no matter how risky, but only with good intentions of others. The citizens of Rome craved the leadership of someone with courage, integrity, and kindness Brutus possessed. Brutus was the leader who could step up to the plate and be
In their introductory scene a discussion is taking place about Caesar's claim to the throne. Through this discussion the audience learns a lot about Cassius and Brutus’s values . It is revealed that Brutus is an honorable man who believes in the general good of mankind. He states, (1.2 84-89)“ What is it that you would impart to me?/ If it be aught toward the general good, / Set honour in one eye and death
Not only does Cassius explain that his conflict is not meaningless, but he also holds himself to Brutus’s own judgment. Cassius powerfully has Brutus evaluate whether he is trustworthy instead of feeding Brutus credentials. Once his trust is bought, Cassius began to contrive doubt into Brutus’s mind about Caesar. Furthermore, ethos was used to ignite Brutus’s flame within. Cassius elegantly builds an allusion to a former founder of Rome, Brutus, who “ would have
In William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Cassius is a foil to Marcus Brutus, for Brutus is consistently described as honorable and kind, contrasting the always clever and self-centered, Cassius. Cassius acts as a character who goes against the virtues and weaknesses of the main character. Brutus announces, “Why man, he doth bestride the narrow World like a Colossus, and we pretty men Walk under his huge legs and peep about To find ourselves dishonorable graves” (Shakespeare I. 2. 142-145). By appealing to Brutus' feeling of honor and loyalty to Rome, Cassius hopes to persuade him to join the conspiracy against Caesar.
When Brutus was talking to the conspirators Brutus was going back and forth think if he should help the conspirators kill Julius Caesar. He was going back and forth because he was thinking of the power he could have and could rule Rome. The reason behind Brutus killing Caesar was for the better of Rome. If Brutus would not have killed Caesar, Rome would have turned into a dictatorship, and in turn it would have ruined Rome and all of its people. Brutus did not kill Julius just for the power to rule Rome, he killed Julius to save Rome from Caesar’s dictatorship.
Brutus believes that Caesar will do more harm than good to the people, and reap benefits for himself. Brutus has already said this, but had said it in his own words, (II, i, 12-14). He has no clue if Caesar will use his power for the good and betterment for the people, or use it for his own needs and other
While Brutus maintains noble intentions, Cassius goes into this scheme with every intention of leaving everyone else behind to claim the power for himself, as he has been compelled by their society to do. Cassius tells Brutus that Caesar “doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus” while convincing him that Caesar is accumulating too much power for one man, despite harboring the belief that all of that power should be his (JC I.ii.142-143). To further prove his point to Brutus, Cassius gives Brutus fake letters telling him that the common people would rather have Brutus in charge than Caesar. While this is just Cassius himself manipulating Brutus, Cassius is motivated by the pressures of their society and Brutus, motivated by the belief that his society wants him to, joins the conspirators in their plot to kill Caesar and take power for themselves. Caught in a vicious cycle of societal pressure, these men continue to fight for power even after they achieve their original goal as evidenced by the civil war that breaks out following the assassination of Julius
Honor in the world gives people a reason to fight for the things that they believe in. Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus has had to make many tough decisions that display the great honor within him. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare's, it is made very obvious that Brutus is an honorable man. Brutus preserves his honor by taking care of Rome’s issues with good intentions and without going too far.
Marcus Brutus and Cassius are both strong characters in William Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar; but Brutus is the only character who experiences a crucial change towards the end of the drama, which makes him the dynamic character. Brutus can be considered the dynamic character in William Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar. Brutus ' role changes from the beginning of the play to the end while Cassius remains fairly constant. At first he is known as Caesar 's dear friend. He then joins a conspiracy to kill Caesar.
(II, i, 53-55) which allows to say that he wants Rome to be just and do whatever it takes to maintain it away from any threat. Indeed, Brutus states this very clearly when he says, “If it’s for the good of all Romans, I’d do it even if it meant my death. Let the gods give me good luck only as long as I love honor more than I fear death.” (I, ii, 86-88), he explicitly says that the good of the majority is over any feeling or personal benefit which in this case is the love of Caesar for him and viceversa, and the throne. To conclude, Brutus is a complex character that is characterized by three recurrent traits: his well-intention, his hypocrisy, and his naivet.
Cassius saves the life of Caesar, sees him beg for water, and witnesses his epileptic seizure. From these weaknesses, Cassius finds himself to be just as worthy of the crown as is Caesar. His reasons are emotionally tied to getting rid of Caesar, Brutus chooses to become a conspirator for the good of Rome. He does not know how Caesar will use his power.
Brutus was a lifetime friend of Caesar 's that was deceived by a man that feared tyranny to betray Caesars trust and become an accomplice to his murder. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” (III, II, 21-22). Brutus loved Rome more than Caesar and he
Early in the play, Cassius states that Brutus does not seem to see him as a
The power of language Language, when used to manipulate, can solely cause war. Language can be used to manipulate others for the purpose of political change to the point of war. In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, the power of language is represented by the use of strong language by characters to persuade others to follow them. War is caused by the manipulation of the senators to kill Caesar and the manipulation of the plebeians to revolt. Cassius in act 1 shows how figurative language can strike emotion in the minds of people.
Sin’s Perpetrator and Victim Human desire knows no bounds; everyone thirsts for something. Some thirst for power, some for wealth, and others for truth. This thirst is a driving factor for most actions, but it is not always for the best. Nowhere else are the dangers of wanting more prevalent than in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. The underlying premise of the play is that one’s own ambition can end up destroying him/her and creating unintended chaos.