A number of people believe before you speak as a negative practice. They state that when you think about your words before you speak them you censor your true words in fear of making another person feel offended by what you want to express. Thus, they suggest that we shouldn’t think before you speak, and instead always say exactly what is on our mind. Though I agree that we should censor our true thoughts only because another person might feel hurt by them, I disagree with the negative perspective on thinking before speaking, Thinking about our words before we speak them, in my opinion, will not always result in us censoring out true thoughts. On the contrary, through personal experience I have come to the conclusion that thinking before we speak has more pros than con, for it helps us express our ideas and thoughts clearly and exactly as we want them to be expressed, it prevents us from being unnecessarily offensive, and helps us stay out of trouble.
At last, the characters no longer have their same feelings of dread. They have useful feelings of dread without bounds, as they don't realize what's in store for them. On the off chance that the kids did not have fears they would not have been spurred to runaway and locate a home where they genuinely have a place. On the off chance that the Fringes individuals did not have their feelings of dread, they would not have found each other. On the off chance that the Waknuk people group did not have fears, they would not understand that the world lives on transformation and difference.
They shouldn’t have been so self centered and actually considered the consequences of the decisions that they were making. The Capulets are a great example of showing that not being there for your child’s life can make them unstable. Consequently the child would soon make poor decisions which will get them into trouble. Hopefully now the Capulet’s will put other people’s opinions into
What are you supposed to do then? Should you speak to someone better capacitated to help that yourself, or should you keep quiet and possibly allow the situation to get worse? No one could possibly blame you if you chose either option, but which one is right? Some would choose the former, others the latter, but it’s safe to say that there wouldn’t a right or wrong action. The uncertainty presented in this situation is evidence that event will arise in which the notion of right or wrong may be
He says in the quote to “Let me be cruel, not unnatural” which means he doesn't want to kill her. It's not natural to kill your own mother, he only wants to hurt her with his words, but why would he have to pray to help not to kill her? He fears that he is going to lose control of himself, which proves that he might actually be a little mad. He doesn’t exactly know what he is going to do and it scares
Father Flynn wants to keep Sister Aloysius and Sister James out of trouble. He wants the school to operate normally for the students, and he cares about the students. Father Flynn’s conversation with Sister James suggests that he did not tell Sister Aloysius because he wants to help Donald Muller. However, this position is flawed because Father Flynn does not want Monsignor Benedict to know his crime. He is trying to prove to Sister Aloysius that he is innocent but his action does not show it.
For example, you don’t want to act nasty to your parents in front of others because others might view one as disrespectful. The second part is commitment where a person will think if the deviant behavior is a respectable way to proceed. Specifically, people that place school, work, and social activities as a center point in their lives would be less likely to engage in crime. The factor of involvement, which is the third point, is a person’s choice to get involved in conventional versus deviant behavior. People that spend more time doing activities like softball practice or field hockey practice don’t have time to commit a crime.
Spanking can also be used to stop kids from doing something shouldn’t be doing or stopping them from doing something dangerous that can potentially harm them. A good spank will snap the child back into reality, the child will know why he/she got spanked and will be too afraid to do it again; however spanking should be used as a last resort when all fails. Children are supposed to respect and obey their parents and it is the parents’ duty to take charge and make sure that their doing just that. However we all know that that isn’t always trust. Some time talking or taking away their cell phone might not always be that effective.
If I were to ignore this core value of respect, I would not be a good role model for my pupils. They might think that since I do not value respect, it would also be 'okay' for them to do so, and thus it might result in them behaving badly and disrespecting their classmates, their teachers, and even their family members. Respect is the foundation of a good and trusting relationship, and since I want my pupils and their parents to trust me, I should treat them with respect for them to learn that it is a valuable moral necessary for good
They don’t see that the teacher could have just been trying to help them become better. They could also think that the teacher doesn’t like them and they won’t want to have that teacher anymore. If one student is called out they could automatically think “If the world think I am wrong, I will be wrong and solve this so they are right”
Sometimes it is best to understand the law first before obeying it. When one thinks a law is unjust, they will go out of their way to go against it and do something about it. At a certain point, one doesn’t have to act accordingly to what they don’t believe in, but they can’t do whatever pleases them. There has been many controversies involving the act of non violence civil disobedience. Although most feel like breaking an unjust law might be the best solution to what they think is right, in reality, I agree to the fact that people are afraid to face the consequences that are given after their actions.
Children that feel they can’t have an interest in something because of their gender need to be shown that it is alright to be different or they will lose interest in it. Moving on to Leslie, when she is bullied because of the way she dresses and for her boyish attitude she becomes upset and yet she does not attempt to change. This can be an example for children that pursue their interests and are self-confident but believe
One may disagree with these reasons, however, and say that it is not justifiable for a doctor to withhold information from their minor patient in any case. For example, children may hear whispering or talk surrounding them and know that a secret is being kept. According to Cole & Kurdish (2013), research shows that “withholding information may result in the child’s imagining a worse scenario or a least a different scenario.” This imagined situation could then create the same anxiety and depression that withholding the information was intending to prevent. Also by withholding the diagnosis, the child is prevented from participating in therapeutic resources such as support groups or cognitive therapy that could help them cope with the disease much more completely and quickly than a child who has been denied access to these resources. Even though the physician and parents may have had the well being of the child in mind when choosing to withhold the information, they are actually unintentionally harming the child’s emotional development even further.
Also, if we want friends, we may want to go for what everyone expect us to do, even if it is bad, this test will help us not do it because it is not beneficial to everyone. That is my point of view of the four way test. The four way test is a way to test different problems in life. I used it on if it is ok to start a fight. I also used it on if it ok to friend a bully.