INTRODUCTION Analogical reasoning is a core of cognition. It is a skill to see the similarities between objects or ideas. The existing knowledge or the prior knowledge of an object or idea is used to explain or understanding the new idea. It allows students to combine two basic reasoning skills of categorization and generalization to cope with new information more effectively. Analogical reasoning involves two components, which are, the source and the target. Source and target are analyzed to see certain patterns that exist. The purpose of analogical reasoning is to adapt the existing knowledge, which is the resource, to form a new concept that can be applied to the target. Analogical reasoning requires higher-order thinking as the analogous patterns is often not obvious. …show more content…
The proportional analogies start from the process of acquisition of the data, to the comparisons data until the usage of the data. Predictive analogies are related to the ability of human brains to predict. Prediction can occur as our brains had going through many incidents which help us gains experience. Analogical problem solving is related to the ability of human brain to solve a problem. These analogies make sure human brain can function
This comparison creates a connection and understanding about growth in people by using
Analogous argument sets up a direct comparison between two things in order to prove a certain thesis. Abductive explanation uses its conclusion to explain its thesis. Authors may use cause and effect strategy to strengthen a claim by proving that there is a direct link between one thing and another.
The subject was able to play the baseball game and time remember many things because he had already practiced that skilled and acquired it so it became automatic for him. Another theory that applies to the subject would be Jean Piaget’s. According to Piaget he believed we have schemas, adaption processes, and stages of development. The subject showed to know what baseball was all about it and he able to interpret to play with just dad instead of his teammates that would be adapting himself to the new situation. The subject was able to show that his cognitive and process skills were effective to the activities he did throughout the
Furthermore, by understanding the purpose, we can see the cause and effects, we can use documents like this to
The psychoneuromuscular theory suggests that imagery works by simulating a command from the brain to the associated muscle or a movement (Cox, 2007). This creates, or strengthens, neural pathways that are similar to the ones created when the physical activity is actually performed. This creates a state where the neuromuscular system can rehearse for the real motions without really activating the related muscle(s).
The metaphors main goal is to take an existing thought in the audiences mind and affiliate it with a message or concept (usually persuasive) that the author has in mind, therefore using the metaphor as a sort of medium of vehicle to propel the targeted concept for the audience to a meaningful resting point were an agreement of the idea can be reached. Metaphors allow the author of persuasive discourse to use fewer words when conveying persuasive thoughts. The aspect of language economy comes to mind here, simply put the fewer complex words needed, the likelihood of agreeableness with the use of metaphors is obtainable. The society of North America is filled with metaphors the people associate with in order to not only justify actions, but to also convey messages that are hard to explain with multiple words. People use elaborate metaphors for multiple means which can be effective with the economy aspect of language usage.
This was one of my primary struggles because when completing the poster portion of this project I had not completely understood the definition of an analogy. So on my poster, I wrote what I assumed was an analogy on this poster. However, when a family member had pointed this out to me when peer editing my project I realized I had completely misinterpreted the definition of an analogy. This had caused me to redo this poster which was very time-consuming. However, at least now for the future, I will understand what an analogy is and will be able to do it right the first
Since 1980 the year when George Lakoff and Mark Johnson published their book “Metaphors We Live By” conceptual metaphor theory has got an important ground in critical discourse analysis. Indeed, several critical discourse analysts have been particularly interested in metaphor as a powerful rhetorical strategy in political discourse (Charteris-Black, 2004, 2011, 2014, Chilton, 2004; Lakoff, 1992, 1995, 2002). In this chapter, it is assumed that Bush’s speeches are metaphor based. As a result, the aim of this chapter is to demonstrate how metaphors can be used subconsciously and deliberately at once, sometimes to hide certain sensitive issues, and others, to construct some cognitive connotations in the listener’s mind in an attempt to shape
In my narrative essay I use informative processing a lot to explain how my athletic program works and how cow sales are done. I briefly use comparison and contrast in my narrative essay when I discuss how I made my decision on whether i was going to the heifer sale or the soccer game/ In my argumentative essay I used development by example in my second body paragraph. I use an example of a school shooting in relation to violence in mass media. In my argument essay I also use comparison and contrast to discuss the different sides of violence in mass media. When discussing Relational Aggression I use definition to explain the term that most people would be unaware of.
The criteria we are going to be looking at for the analogical argument is relevant similarities, relevant dissimilarities, number of instances compared, and diversity among cases. While determining the strength of the inference to the best explanation I will be looking at consistency, testability, fruitfulness, scope and
A metaphor is connected to a simile. They are similar because they both compare things. A metaphor says one thing is another, a simile uses like or as to compare. They are connected because in the book the sniper it talks about his arm as if it were to be cut off. A metaphor would have said he is a bear in a trap armless.
A good reasoning is a reasoning that leads to certain, true and valid conclusions. There are two kinds of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Both processes include the process of finding a conclusion from multiple premises although the way of approach may differ. Deductive reasoning uses general premises to make a specific conclusion; inductive reasoning uses specific premises to make a generalized conclusion. The two types of reasoning can be influenced by emotion in a different manner because of their different process to yield a conclusion.
I mainly use metaphors to help someone better understand a concept. For example, one could say that another is a walking dictionary. This helps us to infer something about another person. We assume that she knows a lot of words and definitions. Right now, I mainly see a lot of repetition and metaphors in music.
1. Metaphor: This would be considered a metaphor because it is a comparison that does not use “like” or “as”, thus connecting two or more usually unlike things that have something in common. “it 's a desert" there is nothing to eat or do” 2. Metaphor: This would be considered a metaphor because it is a comparison that does not use “like” or “as”, thus connecting two or more usually unlike things that have something in common “You do not know how well off you are, I wish I was, Im so caged” 3. Foreshadow: This is a foreshadow because it is hinting at the future or events occurring later in the work.
Furthermore, blackboard drawings were displayed to show the contrasts. Hence, the abstract concept was visualized and it was relatively easy for students to perceive