Presentence Investigative Report

The judge will make a bail decision and determine the amount of bail and the bail schedule. The monetary amount will be based on the arrestee 's criminal record, the arrestee 's ties to the community, employment, and family, the seriousness of the crime, and the danger that the suspect 's release may result to the community. If the arrestee cannot afford the full amount of the bail, he or she can post a bail bond in lieu of the full amount. A bond is a kind of written promise that the full bail amount will be paid in the event that the suspect fails to appear in court as agreed. The bail bond is usually acquired through a bail bonds agency.

It 's a common misconception that someone arrested for DUI must plead guilty in court. With a skilled defense attorney who can examine all the nuances of your individual case, you may very well find that you 're spared having to put your future on the line in this manner. You have the absolute right to challenge the procedures that were used during your arrest, the cause for which you were arrested, and the evidence being used against you. But you can 't do it alone.

This is my persanl anylisa on the Lindbergh case and how the police, courts, and corrections play a role in the case. The police conducted investagations on the case that lead to the arest of Bruno Richard Hauptmann. Then came corrections who kept the suspect at the time Bruno Richard Hauptmann in custody while he was going through the court process. Now we have have courts they place him at the crime scene and used the evidence to prove Bruno Richard Hauptmann is guilty. Last the corrections play another factor in the case were the carried out Bruno Richard Hauptmann 's sentancing.

Before we jump to judgmental conclusions about someone that has been convicted of a crime, then sentenced a lengthy prison term under the mandatory minimum laws, we must first dissect ourselves. I will leave you with this simple question: Have you ever made a decision without fully understanding how the outcome would turn

Also, with the criminal justice system there are 3 parts which include police, courts, and corrections. Police are the ones who enforce the law, investigate crimes, and apprehend offenders. Corrections include carrying out sentences imposed by the courts and they also provide safe and humane custody and supervision of offenders. Courts are to conduct fair and impartial trials and they also decide criminal cases.

It also guarantees that life, liberty and property cannot be taken away without the due process of law. The Sixth Amendment allows for one accused of a crime to have a trial and a jury. The accused has the right to know what crime they were accused of, and has the right to hear all witnesses against them. The accused have the right to call witnesses to court. The accused is also guaranteed a lawyer, if they cannot afford one, the government must provide one.

The Judiciary- Judges have an important role within the court system, because they are legal experts of the law if the prosecution and defence are in dispute. The judiciary mange and oversee the conduct of trails and they sum up them up for the jury in a criminal case. They also pronounce sentence if a defendant is found guilty. In order

David, I agree with many points in your discussion board. Prosecutors and Defendants both take an oath that anything they present to the court is proven to be true. The integrity of the attorneys is a key role in the law aspect of criminal justice. When a prosecutor brings false evidence is brought to the court room then individuals have the chance of receiving a sentence they are not guilty for. While if an officer violates a convicted individuals rights and the defense does not present the violation in the trial, then this individual was misrepresented and both the defense attorney and officer should be punished.

So in a nut shell, every state has its own set of rules for the punishment of criminals called sentencing guidelines, which are sentencing policies prosecutors and judges use for people convicted of serious misdemeanors and felonies (Peak,2015). The crime and the criminal 's previous criminal history is considered when a judge hands down a sentence. People that oppose alternative sentencing argue that an individual 's circumstances are unique and should be considered during sentencing, otherwise there is a possibility of

Judges are also given the power to decide/figure out the realness/respect/truth

To evaluate the offender 's risk level and provide effective treatment for this individual, I would collect as much information about the offender as possible by reviewing case records and conducting observations, interviews, background checks, and a formal evaluation (CITE, 418?). I would use the risk and need scale provided by The Level of Service Inventory-Revised to assess the offender 's criminogenic needs along ten domains, including: personality characteristics, pro-criminal attitudes, substance abuse, and family and marital history. There are several other assessment tools that would be useful throughout the process of evaluation: the PCL-R, the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, the Historical, Clinical, and the Risk Management Scale.

Ever since Sherlock Holmes, police and prosecutors have solved cases by confessions or eyewitness accounts, but recently they started solving cases from the forensic evidence found. In the passage, “Forensic Science: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is explained to be the most important evidence to present at trial. Forensic evidence are things like “fingerprints, body fluids, and bullets” (paragraph one). Forensic evidence is the evidence that’s found at the scene of a crime. In paragraph two, it says, “after police have secured the site, criminal investigators collect physical evidence.

While the state of Mississippi, my home state, does provide for the expungement of juvenile records, the actual process of expungement is rare. The reason for this is the state laws, which govern the sealing of all juvenile records. Even though the state law calls for the sealing of juvenile records, juvenile adjudications can be taken into consideration, by judges of the circuit courts, when determining sentences. This records can also be used, and disseminated to others, usually by court order of the youth court. Section 43-21-263 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, provides for the sealing of all juvenile court records, once a person has reached 20 years of age.