Election is fast approaching and in less than a month, millions of registered Filipino voters around the country and all over the world would be casting their votes and would be electing our new president. As the election day is nearing, it is very important for the Filipino people to choose wisely who among the presidential candidates is the most qualified for the top leadership position in the Philippine government because their choice would certainly play an important role in what will happen to our country in the next six years. Among the five presidential candidates, Miriam Defensor-Santiago is probably the most senior among all of them and is always the one lagging in popular poll surveys, but ironically, she is the most popular among …show more content…
First, many would say that it is waste to vote for a person who would eventually die, but don 't these people think that the other candidates are not expelled from the likeliness of dying soon as well? Who would forget that the much loved late President Magsaysay and former DILG Secretary Jesse Robredo both died of a plane crash? These were unexpected accidents and these are just examples that anyone at any moment could die. Death isn 't something that everyone prepares for. Second, many would say they are disappointed with the senator 's choice of running mate who is Bong Bong Marcos, the son of the late Ferdinand Marcos. I believe that Senator Miriam 's choice of running mate might be because of the convenience that it brings to both of them because the two of them are available and looking for partners. Unlike in countries like the United States of America, we are not forced to vote for both the president and vice president candidate of a political party. Just like what Tort (2015) wrote in one his articles, the choice of running mate is an insignificant factor compared to the individual merit of a presidential candidate. He even cited examples of many elections in the country which resulted to a president and a vice president coming from different parties. In a country where the election system works differently, pairings of candidates is not something that one should really focused on when making decisions. Lastly, the consistent low rank of Senator Miriam
Karen Rodriguez Professor: Dr. Kathryn DePalo POS 4072 10 November 2014 The Race for Iowa’s 2nd District: Dave Loebsack vs. Mariannette Miller-Meeks It has been three times that Dr. Mariannette Miller-Meeks has had to face off against her opponent Dave Loebsack a contest that has been dating back since 2008. Therefore as you can see Miller-Meeks is no stranger to her opponent and she clearly demonstrates that she is a fighter, who is not willing to go down so easily, even after facing off three times and having lost the previous races, Miller-Meeks has once again chosen to compete in the race for U.S. House Representative.
Huckabee has the experience that is needed to be president. He has great ideas that will improve the government 's systems. He lead his state to prosperity and he would do the same to the United States as president. Graham has great military background and political experience. “He was awarded the Bronze Star in 2014 for meritorious service for his role as a senior legal adviser to the Air Force during combat operations in Afghanistan.”
Every great nation started with a great leader. A person that can provide and lead a nation to greatness and success. Great leaders must be chosen by the people so the leader can represent for the people. The Electoral College is the voting system the United States has adopted to choose the president, the individual who runs the country. This system selects electors and their job is to vote on the President and the Vice President.
Essay topic: Explain why Hamilton and Madison called for a Constitutional Convention in 1787 and discuss the proposed plans. Discuss and describe the struggles and the many compromises that were reflected in the final version of the U.S. Constitution. How and why does the Constitution divide government power among three branches? America needed a new organization to keep it from falling apart, however America also feared a strong controlling government. Each state was so independent that they all had their own constitutions ,consisting of a bill of rights guaranteeing certain freedoms and legal protections to the state’s citizens, and their own currency.
Briefly, in the evolution of the Texas political system, Texas’s history has been through many situations that shaped the political structure in Texas to become to what it is today. Many changes were responsible for the impact in the history of Texas such as the Texas revolution, the Alamo war with Mexico, military reconstruction act in 1867, etc. Before the war with Mexico, one of the most important impact in Texas history was the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836. Texas and Mexico have an escalating tension and is responsible for the new change in the Texas state constitution. For the cause of the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836, Texas begins by declaring its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and decided to adopt the new constitution.
Australia is a Democracy Never before have there been so many democracies in the world or so many competitive elections conducted at national, subnational and region levels. Democracy is now prescribed as inseparable from good governance and an antidote to corruption. The key aspects of what makes Australia a democracy being the electoral role, Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), referendumsm, the rule of law The separate colonies of Australia gained self-government during the nineteenth century and less than half a century later Australia became the first nation to vote itself into existence through popular referendum. How does Australia’s democracy in today’s modern age stack up on those early days of a fledgling democracy.
One of the things that makes America so great is its election process. The US elections are fair and not rigged by the people in power(as far as the public knows.) Despite this, there are still some people who try and get the elections to go one way. This is called voter fraud. Voter fraud can take many different forms, switching ballots, tampering with results, pressuring voters, and voting in the place of others.
The Gilded age was a period in the late 1800s (1865-1900) that showed tremendous increase of wealth caused by the industrial age. The lifestyle of the rich during this period hid the many problems of the time that eventually brought about the progressive era movement. This was a movement for reform between 1900-1920s. Progressives typically held that the irresponsible actions of the rich were corrupting both public and private life. Forces such as immigration, the Populist Party and industrialization that led to the progressive era also impacted the American government both in its activeness and its democracy.
The United States of America is not truly a democracy. America’s government is all over the place and pretty much a mixture of everything, it never has been just democracy. The characteristics of a democracy are where the majority wins but that never really happens. For example the president election majority does not elect the president. The United States of America is not a democracy for many reasons; Rule by law, we are more a republic than a democracy, and the founders of a nation didn 't want a democracy.
Gerrymandering; the process of manipulating district boundaries in order to gain a political advantage, and also one of the most controversial politic topics in today's government. Many people are for, and also against, changing the redistricting process in an effort to eliminate gerrymandering. The textbook and attached video provide answers, and then some to any questions about gerrymandering. To begin, the redistricting process takes place every 10 years. It takes place every ten years because the national census takes place every 10 years, allowing the redistricting to follow directly behind the census.
She does not find it fair that only men are given the right opportunity to vote. Shaw’s tone is persuasive when she gives the definition of a republic to prove
Uglow, Frances Hinton, and Maggy Hendry. 4th ed. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, 2005 3) Valerie Knowles, First Person: A Biography of Cairine Wilson Canada'as First Woman Senator. Louiseville: Dundurn Press Ltd., 1988.
Throughout the recent years the majority of the able voting population are exercising their privilege to vote. Even during the presidential elections the voter turnout rate was 50% or less than that. The act of voting should be a personal responsibility of every citizen meaning it should be a obligation. But to specify on this statement, it should not lawfully required to vote because people also have the right not to vote too (and it would be weakening personal liberties) , but it should be a personal responsibility for citizens if they are to complain about how the government run rather than every citizen. A personal responsibility is when we are the cause of our own actions.
Everyone has the right to vote, but many don’t take that opportunity. In the article “Should Voting Be Mandatory?” Eric Liu tells us that “mandatory voting would prompt more Americans to pay attention to the choices;” people usually never pay attention to their choices, and then complain about it later when everything has already happened. (Par 5). Mandatory voting means that every citizen of the age of 18 and above that has a right to vote must vote.
Many people believe that the election plays the most important role in democracy. Because a free and fair election holds the government responsible and forces it to behave on voter's interest. However, some scholars find evidence that election itself is not enough to hold politicians responsible if the institutions are not shaping incentives in a correct way. In other words, the role of the election on democracy, whether it helps to serve the interest of the public or specific groups, depends on other political institutions. I