Presidential Pardons
A persuasive argument is an argument that stands upon reason and logic to persuade others. Charles Lane’s article “Forget Chelsea Manning. This is the Obama pardon you should be mad about” is a good example of a persuasive argument. He puts forth the claim that it is not the recent pardoning of Chelsea Manning that the masses should be angry at. Rather instead he insists that if they are going to be outraged by a presidential pardoning they should direct their attention to the concurrent pardoning of Oscar Lopez Rivera. In his article, Lane first starts out by explaining what a presidential pardon is and how they usually work, then he starts to point out the glaring differences in the two cases. Lanes article is more persuasive because he mainly focuses on and
…show more content…
While on the other hand Rivera continues to refuses to take responsibility for his actions and shows not even the slightest sign of remorse. Lane quotes, “’Rick Hahn, the now-retired FBI special agent who helped investigate the original case against Lopez Rivera, told me. ‘But people I know who were victims of the FALN say that if the guy would just say he’s sorry, they’d all say, ‘Fine, let him go’.” Here lane is using a bit of ethos to bolster his argument by highlighting the thoughts of an officer of the law, a reliable source. Lane is playing on his reader’s emotion, one would think a prerequisite for someone to receive an unconditional release should be that they show at least a tad bit of remorse for their crimes. It is hard for the average person to support the unconditional release of someone who is not sorry in the slightest for their actions. Lane is trying to show the divide between the two cases in this passage by highlighted how one supposedly is sorry for their actions. Whilst the other still stands firm and refuses to denounce violence that they enacted and the violence that they had
Overall, Stanley “Tookie” Williams did not deserve clemency. First, according to the article, “As a Criminal” it says “Williams scheduled to be executed at San Quentin State Prison Dec.13 for the shotgun murders of four people…” In other words Williams killed 4 people for what he was held in prison
Butler does not view the punishment for Tuner appropriate, but sees the sentence as progress. The claim Butler makes as an excuse for the judge is bias for whites. With support from Angela Davis, Butler approaches the Stanford situation that happens regularly and is expected. Butler’s last reason to not have a recall is punishment. Butler believes that judges will have harder punishments.
In regards to Hart and Daughton, the role of analysis in rhetorical criticism plays an important role in a variety of ways. From persuasion, to structure and form, to syntax, each showcases a significant faction of analysis in rhetorical criticism. Persuasion, relates to several differential logic forms – human and informal, which tie together arguments considered thin, and those considered higher in class. In analyzing, persuasively, it is important that an individual does not immediately classify a reasoning put forth by a rhetor, to be not credible. This is due to the assumptions, or biases people bring with them in daily life; such as, the idea that people have reasons for doing what they do, and the idea that persuasion is generally credible.
My rhetorical situation for this argument is to bring to light the corruption of the Michigan Judicial system, focused more on Sobriety Court. My audience is directed towards students and instructors at NMC. My stance is that the Sobriety Court system needs to be more supportive to their partakers. My context is derived from a personal experience with my topic.
Persuasion or manipulation, one lets you select the choice yourself and the other attempts to make the choice for you. Persuasion is the action of cause someone to do something through reasoning or argument. Henry’s Speech in the Virginia Convention and Franklin's The Speech in the Convention both are prime examples of persuasion. There are numerous ways to persuade someone, whether it’s antithesis, restatement, repetition, or rhetorical questions; These are examples of rhetorical devices are exceptional tools for persuading an audience. Franklin uses antithesis as well as logic to persuade his audience to unanimously pass the constitution, while Henry uses parallel rhetorical questions and appealed to the audience's sense of logos and ethos to persuade his audience that we must go to war with Britain.
The arguments and claims presented in “Rough Justice” are not just briefly explained. Instead, the author develops and conveys his message consistently throughout the whole passage, avoiding any illogical claims or fallacies. For example, the author constantly reiterates how “‘In Britain and in America, they keep very strongly to the presumption of innocence’” (Reyes 182). By being persistent and and reiterating his message, Alejandro Reyes avoids the use of illogical
No one deserves to die, and no one deserves death. Some executions are justified, but David Herold’s was not. Herold was a skilled and talented man who was deprived into a corner to help a killer. James L. Swanson’s novel, Chasing Lincoln 's Killer, a diary entry, “Last Diary Entry of John Wilkes Booth,” and an article, “Lincoln Writ of Liberty” contain evidence that proves Herold’s innocence. Herold did help a murderer; however, he is like everyone, in that he is susceptible to violent threats.
There's no going back. ”(Shane, 1953), when we go back and follow that same idea, and let those who “deserve to die, die” and we turn our backs to this our we pray for a lynch mob almost as crazy as the Salem witch trials. So how about instead of fighting to kill someone who has killed, how about we fight for either a) a life time sentence or b) investing in a better rehabilitation programs in the
“ I won’t write a word because I am innocent. ”(Ha 472) Mr. Chiu still believes that his plead of innocence will help him win his freedom. He does not realize that he is not in a place of influence or power to sway their decision. His complaints have no impact on those in charge of him.
The power of persuasion is one that has proved its influence all throughout the history of humanity, convincing the masses to think as one body. This talent is not without practice or order however, even those talented with influence must be organized and eloquently sew their words together to prove a point. Only arguments that can appeal to all are able to be successful. In President John F. Kennedy’s Speech “Peace Speech”, examples of Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion are used. Kennedy uses the appeal of his credibility (Ethos), emotion (Pathos), and logic (Logos) to support his argument against war.
Judge Danforth Explains that “I cannot pardon these when twelve are hanged for the same crime” (119). Danforth knows that Procter is right, but he is not trying to please solely Procter. Danforth has an entire community to worry about, in a town where nearly everyone is considered crazy, Danforth is the last solid figure they have. If Danforth starts to second guess himself, he fears that people will be very upset, if he admits he unjustly killed 12 people, then he is the worst murderer of them all.
One of the rhetoric strategies Louv uses to develop his argument is asking questions. After establishing his stance on the separation between between people and nature, Louv presents two questions to his readers. Louv asks, “Why do so many Americans say they want their children to watch less TV, yet continue to expand the opportunities for them to watch it? More important, why do so many people no longer consider the physical world worth watching?” In the first question, Louv is referring to the television sets that can be found on the back of headrests now.
It is not just” (Miller 129). Mr. Danforth refuses to pardon the condemned not because it is unjust but to save his reputation. Mr. Danforth knows he will look like a fool, he put his
In Darrow’s closing argument he gives his famed “A Plea for Mercy” to the judge. This plea not only acted as a conclusion to his defense, but it also acted as an introduction the eradication of the death penalty. Darrow uses a mix of ethos, pathos, logos, and other rhetorical devices to impose a merciful effect on his audience in hopes to reduce his clients punishment and the use of capital punishment. Darrow gracefully uses all three appeals when referring to the rise of crime after war “I know that it has followed every war; and I know it has influenced these boys so that life was not the same to them as it would have been if the world had not been made red with blood.
Persuading by appealing to readers emotions. It depends on the language choice of affect to the audience's emotional response. Pathos can make the argument very strong. Many world class athletes have strength, focused on one goal and love is very common in sports today. Nike adds fuel to these emotions by adding ," just do it".