Presumption Of Innocence Essay
The presumption of innocence is widely accepted as an integral and significant principle of the criminal justice that lawyers all over the world adhere to as it is a tenant of the Criminal Law. The presumption of innocence can be defined as a misnomer; a name that is wrongly or unsuitably applied to a person or an object. It also can be described as an assumption made towards an innocent that is included in the absence of opposing evidence. It is shown in the case of Taylor v Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 98 S. Ct 1930, 56 L. However, it is not considered as an evidence of the defendant’s innocence and it does not require any compulsory inference that are favourable towards the defendant from any facts of the evidence.
In some countries like South
…show more content…
(Mueller, Christopher B.; Laird C. Kirkpatrick (2009). Evidence; 4th ed. Aspen (Wolters Kluwer). ISBN 978-0-7355-7968-2. pp. 133–34.) This was expressed in the phase “innocent until proven guilty” which was coined by an English lawyer, Sir William Garrow (1760 – 1840) (Moore, Christopher (1997). The Law Society of Upper Canada and Ontario's lawyers, 1797–1997. University of Toronto Press.) The presumption of innocence is actually a legal instrument that was created by the French cardinal and jurist, Jean Lemoine, in order to favour the accused based on the legal position that not everyone is a criminal. (Words and Phrases 1914, p. …show more content…
Despite all of that, questions may arise from the topic such as is it right to detain a person before trial just to have him to be presented on the day of trial in case he is deemed guilty or is it right for one to confiscate a suspect’s money (bail money) to be certain that he will pay for the fine later as part of his sentence? Such actions made are clear that it is violating the presumption of innocence as it was only ‘assumed’ that the person is indeed guilty and applying a pre – trial detention is based on the reliance of ‘double suspicion’ as such to the case of Sheldrake v DPP. [cite]
The point is further discussed by Lord Bingham based on the case of Sheldrake v DPP, “The overriding concern is that a trial should be fair, and the presumption of innocence is a fundamental right directed to that end. The Convention does not outlaw presumptions of fact or law but requires that these should be kept within reasonable limits and should not be arbitrary. It is open to states to define the constituent elements of a criminal offence, excluding the requirement of mens rea. But the substance and effect of any presumption adverse to a defendant must be examined, and must be reasonable.”
Summary Of The Petitioner V. Collins
603 Words | 3 PagesCollins, 506 U.S. 390). The case was complicated because the state had already met its expenses and burden to prove during trial that the convict was guilty of the capital murder beyond judicious doubt. The presumption of innocence disappears when a person is convicted. According to the petitioner, he claims that the evidence that was not presented in court proved him innocent the verdict notwithstanding.
Racial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesOn the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.
Dear Zachary Essay
929 Words | 4 PagesThe film Dear Zachary, directed by Kurt Kuenne, makes an argument in response to a very specific situation: the murder of Kuenne’s best friend Andrew Bagby and Bagby’s son Zachary, both killed by Andrew’s ex-girlfriend Shirley Turner. Kuenne argues that bail should be denied to anybody accused of a serious crime who also has custody of a child. While this argument is reasonable, it only provides a solution for very narrow circumstances. For the greater protection of society as a whole, an expanded version of Kuenne’s stance on bail laws is necessary. Bail should be denied not only to people accused of a serious crime who have custody of a child, but also to anybody suspect of a violent crime.
Innocence Project Thesis
1227 Words | 5 PagesSince the founding of our judicial system there have always been individuals claiming innocence to a crime that they have been found guilty of, traditionally, after their sentencing no matter how innocent they may or may not be would have to serve, live and possibly die by the decision of their peers. The Innocence Project, founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck alongside Peter J. Neufeld faces this issue by challenging the sentencing of convicted individuals who claim their innocence and have factual ground to stand upon. The Innocence Project uses the recent advances in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing to prove their client’s innocence by using methods that were not available, too primitive or not provided to their clients during their investigation,
To Kill A Mockingbird Innocence Analysis
811 Words | 4 Pages“Mockingbirds don’t do one thing but make music for us to enjoy… That’s why it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird” (Lee 119). Innocence is just like a mockingbird, it is robbed away from children who have done nothing wrong. The novel To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee takes place in the 1930s during the Great Depression, in a small-sized town called Maycomb in Alabama. Jem Finch and Dill Harris are young children that have to experience and see new things as they grow up and in the process lost some of their innocence. However, Scout Jem’s little sister is the only one that keeps her innocence throughout the novel.
Examples Of Innocence In 12 Angry Men
333 Words | 2 Pages“A person is innocent until proved guilty in a court of law” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence, the three that are in doubt are the old man hearing “I’m going to kill you!” as well as the weapon of choice and how it was replicated, and finally the woman’s testimony. In my opinion, the boy could have been proven guilty, based on these the boy is not guilty.
Convicting The Innocent Summary
955 Words | 4 PagesConvicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong In Brandon L. Garrett 's book, Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, he makes it very clear how wrongful convictions occur and how these people have spent many years in prison for crimes they never committed. Garrett presents 250 cases of innocent people who were convicted wrongfully because the prosecutors opposed testing the DNA of those convicted. Garrett provided simple statistics such as graphs, percentages, and charts to help the reader understand just how great of an impact this was.
Toops V. Case Brief
718 Words | 3 PagesApplication/Analysis: However because no Indiana case has specifically set forth the elements of the necessity defense. In that regard we agree with the Californian count’s holding People v. Pena (1983), 197 Cal. Rptr. 264,271, that the following requirements have traditionally been held to be prerequisites in establishing a necessity defense (The Rules)
How Does Tom Robinson Show Innocence In To Kill A Mockingbird
732 Words | 3 PagesIn the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee the term mockingbird symbolizes innocence in a person. In the novel it focuses on the fact that innocence, represented by the mockingbird, can be wrongfully harmed. There are two characters: Tom Robinson and Arthur “Boo” Radley that are supposed to represent the mockingbird. In the novel, Tom Robinson is the best example of a mockingbird because he is prosecuted for a crime he did not commit. Also, he was judged unfairly based on the color of his skin in his trial.
Double Jeopardy Case Study
1291 Words | 6 PagesThe petitioner was subsequently arrested with the offence of obtaining money by false pretences contrary to Section 313 of the Penal Code. He invoked the principle of autrofois convict which the court dismissed by stating, that it is generally agreed that proceedings before the Committee relate to “professional misconduct, which expression includes disgraceful or dishonourable conduct incompatible with the status of an advocated” – Section 60 of the Advocates Act. Criminal prosecutions on the other hand relate to the “determination of the guilt or innocence of a person charged with crime” . Origin of The Double Jeopardy Rule It is believed that ancient Jewish law contained references to principles encompassed by double jeopardy.
Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesReasonable doubt proves that critical thinking is important when someone’s life is in someone else’s hands. “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, is a play about twelve jury members who must deliberate and decide the fate of a man who is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men must unanimously agree on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty without reasonable doubt. Just like the jurors, the readers of this play have not witnessed the crime that took place before the trial started. Everyone, but the writer, is in the dark about who committed the crime.
Thin Slicing Examples
617 Words | 3 PagesWe have seen a lot of situations where innocent people are accused of something they didn’t do because of the existence of biases or a specific personal experience. So, even though this kind of thinking might be useful, it should be taken into account that it is based only on the “judge” inner feelings and thoughts. B-
Presumption Of Innocence In Woolmington V. DPP (1991)
836 Words | 4 PagesThe question requires one to discuss as to what extent has the “Presumption of Innocence” as articulated by Viscount Sankey in Woolmington v DPP [1935] , has changed in light of Human Rights Act [HRA] 1998. Woolmington v DPP is a landmark House of Lords [ HOL] case where the Presumption of Innocence was first articulated # . In delivering his judgement for a unanimous Court, Viscount Sankey made his famous "Golden thread’ speech . ‘Throughout the web of the English Criminal Law one golden thread is always to be seen that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt subject to... the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception. If, at the end of and on the whole of the case, there is a reasonable doubt, created by the evidence given by either the prosecution or the prisoner...
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Mens Rea
1312 Words | 6 PagesThe mens rea is the mental element of an offence. It refers to the mental state of the accused in terms of the offence. If no mens rea is present the accused cannot be convicted with the exception of absolute or strict liability. In order for a person to be guilty of a specific crime it is expected that the defendant has the necessary mens rea.(4) ‘Intention means the conscious objective or purpose of the accused.’(1) Intention is not the same as motive or desire to achieve a particular result.
Cardinal Principles Essay
1076 Words | 5 PagesEvaluate the effectiveness of the ‘cardinal principles’ enunciated by Prof. Ian Dennis vis-à-vis reversal of burden onto the defendant in criminal cases. To what extend does it achieve it’s purpose? Introduction In Woolmington v DPP, Viscount Sankey LC laid down the golden thread rule (also known as concept of presumption of innocence) which presumed the defendant is innocence until proven guilty by the prosecution by proposed “Throughout the web of the English criminal law, one golden thread is always be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner’s guilt…”
More about Presumption Of Innocence Essay
Summary Of The Petitioner V. Collins
603 Words | 3 PagesRacial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesDear Zachary Essay
929 Words | 4 PagesInnocence Project Thesis
1227 Words | 5 PagesTo Kill A Mockingbird Innocence Analysis
811 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Innocence In 12 Angry Men
333 Words | 2 PagesConvicting The Innocent Summary
955 Words | 4 PagesToops V. Case Brief
718 Words | 3 PagesHow Does Tom Robinson Show Innocence In To Kill A Mockingbird
732 Words | 3 PagesDouble Jeopardy Case Study
1291 Words | 6 PagesReasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesThin Slicing Examples
617 Words | 3 PagesPresumption Of Innocence In Woolmington V. DPP (1991)
836 Words | 4 PagesAdvantages And Disadvantages Of Mens Rea
1312 Words | 6 PagesCardinal Principles Essay
1076 Words | 5 Pages