The Complexity of Forgetting In Love and Honour and Pity and Pride and Compassion and Sacrifice by Nam Le, readers are acknowledged the reason behind the conflict between the two protagonists, the father and the son, in the story that it is rooted from overly strict nurturing. Not to let readers dislike the character of the father too far, the story of Thanh, the father, about his experience in Vietnam War is inserted to offer the reason of his suffering from the memory of the war which, perhaps, leads him to bring up Nam, the narrator and his son, strictly as if his life is in the war camp. The story probably arouses some readers' pity, understanding, or interest in his attempt to forget the battle in both his action and speech. Yet, in the …show more content…
I'll remember… Sometimes it's better to forget, no?" (p.25). In one dialogue, his speech is different and confusing. It is definite that Thanh does not want other people to know his story; yet, the case is, it seems he, himself, does not certain that he wants to remember or to forget. It does not clear here whether he wants his son to remember as if two of them have a common secret, as stated in the beginning of the dialogue; or he wants his son and himself to forget as he asks at the end of the dialogue. Besides, the conversation implies that he feels it is better to forget, but it has the sense that he says this because he does not achieve so. Further, by saying 'sometimes', maybe he just says it like an intro word which means nothing; or, interestingly, it suggests that there are other times that it is not necessary to forget. These other times maybe include the time he names his son after Vietnam – Nam – also. Considering the paragraph on page 20 which Nam states that "[T]o my father there was no other name – only mine, and he had named me after the homeland he had given up." The first sentence has two interpretations. The first is that he is the only one who his father cares. The second is that the title my name – Nam – is very significant to his father that no other names can win over his mind when he entitles Nam with this name. Naming his own son after the homeland where the events took place is strange if he really wants to forget the nightmare. It might be very irritating recalling gory events in Vietnam every time he calls his son, but he still denominates his own son with that 'Nam'. In a sense, it suggests that Thanh lives with his son as he has to live up with this name through his life. That is to say, he realizes that he cannot pass over those brutal experiences in Vietnam, so he decides to live with it frankly; he will not try to cut it off anymore.
“Shifty- Shifre. She could remember that.” Pg. 47. But, even though they’re small details in the book, they do create a huge theme. Since remembering is a huge contribution, there are many other parts of the story where remembering is a factor.
He writes: - “For the survivor who chooses to testify, it is clear: his duty is to bear witness for the dead and for the living. He has no right to deprive future generations of a past that belongs to our collective memory. To forget would be not only dangerous but offensive; to forget the dead would be akin to killing them a second
He himself can’t seem to come to terms with the atrocities his battalion committed--which is why he keeps revisiting the memories--
I lost something there. Like a path I was walking that dead-ended, and now I am alone and lost in the forest, and I am here and I do not know where here is anymore.” (Gaiman, 2013). As mentioned in the story, the man is unable to remember many of the words and names that he has learned over time, but he has not forgotten concepts, he just has to describe them to himself in order to remember and we can sense his growing frustration in doing so. I saw the same thing happen with my grandfather, I knew his memory was still there, but it was just so hard for him to recall it easily and it was heartbreaking to
Some people might say this, “Very frightening. I can’t even imagine it. We really have to protect people from wrong choices.” pg. 93 Hisjob was to hold memories to protect the people from choosing wrong, but it stops him from living like the others do.
Everyone has a father, whether their relationship with him is good or bad. Webster’s Dictionary defines the word father as follows: a man in relation to his natural child or children. “My Papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke and “Those Winter Sundays” by Robert Hayden are two poems with themes set around a father. These poems deal with accounts of the poets’ fathers as they reminisce about certain scenes from their childhood. “My Papa’s Waltz” and “Those Winter Sundays” show similarities and differences in structure, literary elements, and central idea.
He begins listing simple things, such as the moon, how the grass swayed from the wind of a helicopter, and a red clay trail. Then it grows more serious, from listing a hand grenade to the sight of a young dead man that he killed. The contrast from the petty memories to the young dead man makes his killing stand out. The purpose of the comparison and contrast is to emphasize the abrupt brutalness of death and fear during a war. The significance of the repetition of his age was to show how much time has passed from serving in the Vietnam War, but is still affected by the memories.
Regret is a powerful emotion that has the ability to scar someone for the rest of their life. Moments of regret can come from relationships, self-made decisions and life changing events. The idea of regret also applies to “A Marker on the Side of the Boat” by Bao Ninh and “On the Rainy River” by Tim O’Brien. Although these two literary pieces are very different in many ways, both authors describe the experience of the Vietnam War as a time of regretful decisions that negatively impacted people of both the American side and the Vietnamese side. Both authors tell a story about a character that recalls of flashbacks of the war, where they grieve over the past decisions that have affected them for the rest of their life.
In this passage, his memory revolves around surviving. “I am running. That’s the first thing I remember. Running. I carry something, my arm curled around it, hugging it to my chest.
Lastly, the two words the son and the man add to the complexity of the relationship. This shows that the man can’t picture himself being a father, especially after knowing he can’t meet the child’s expectation, but will always picture his son being a child in his eyes. In conclusion the author uses literary devices to add depth and emotion to the complex relationship between the two characters. He does this by changing the point of view throughout the poem from son to father. He uses a purposeful structure from present to future coming back to present to demonstrate with the complexity of the father's
The older man 's behavior contrasts with that of the persona who is young and has barely experienced life. Whereas the speaker is eager to discover life and have new experiences to escape her reality, the older man avoids his truth by focusing on mundane details of his experience in the Vietnam War. Furthermore, the older man was once a young man himself, surely eager to have new experiences, as he enrolled in the army. Instead of having these desires fulfilled, his memories of the war have caused his view of the world to greatly deviate from that of the persona and
“Love and Honor and Pity and Pride and Compassion and Sacrifice” Nam Le’s “Love and Honor and Pity and Pride and Compassion and Sacrifice” is categorized in “ethnic story” narrated his Vietnamese life in order to meet an upcoming deadline even though finally he can’t submit his story because his father burns his work. Throughout the story, Nam the narrator talks about “the past” which he experiences when he was young including the recent experience that he has got from his father reunion. Not only does the story tell us about the past which, but it also shows a connection of time between past, present, and future. Likewise, the story shows the relationship between son and father which is the main theme of this story; and shows how the past is important and affect to them differently. Also, the story of the past could lead to the end of the story that can be interpreted like a prediction of the direction of their relationship in the future.
This action shows that the boy obviously misses his father and wants him to come back. He had no one else and now is all alone in the world. The boy is sad because his father died, but also because of his desolation from life. The boy is so secluded from life, he weeps for his
The memories that are reflected upon in the story are very random and can across as odd. Wolff chooses to ignore common memories to really emphasize the meaning behind the story.
Memories help you remember the important parts of the past. Without memories, you forget things like war and violence. On page 125 of The Giver it says, “He could hear noises: the sharp crack of weapons. He perceived the word guns.” Without the memory of guns he would not know what a gun was and what he could do.