ipl-logo

Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's The Munich Agreement

319 Words2 Pages

The Munich agreement was created in order for the World War II to be averted. In his speech in defence of the Munich Agreement, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain reassures everyone in persuading them that the right decision had been made: to hand over Czechoslovakia to Germany. ‘Time was essence’ he reminded and it was crucial to reach the right decision as soon as possible. Chamberlain believed that if too much time passed a provocation could unnecessary conflict. Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain mainly highlights in his speech that ‘the real triumph’ was the fact that all 4 great powers had succeeded in coming together and making a decision without violence, fighting and chaos. We learn that in The Munich Agreement, Czechoslovakia was

Show More
Related

  • Treaty Of Versailles Dbq

    471 Words  | 2 Pages

    After millions of deaths occurred during World War I, a peace treaty known as the Treaty of Versailles was created to maintain peace as well as prevent war; however, coincedently, the same treaty that was made to sustain peace helped prompt the start of yet another bloody war known as World War II. During the end of World War I, Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles as punishment for Germany and her allies being the aggressors of the war. Reparations, the War Guilt Clause, territorial loss, and restricted military were all factors as to how the Treaty of Versailles helped trigger World War II. War reparations were payments that Germany were required to pay as punishment to World War 1. Document C displays how Germany was set

    Read More

  • Kennan's Opinion Justified?

    171 Words  | 1 Pages

    Additionally, Germany has also weakened the Czech’s security system with more power from the appeasement. This illustrated the importance of the differences between

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Versailles Dbq Essay

    799 Words  | 4 Pages

    Negotiations, if done correctly, create peace among the sides. The Versailles Treaty was a sad excuse for a negotiation which resulted in even more conflict than ever before. Between the years of 1914 and 1918, powers such as Germany and Austria-Hungary engaged in war against France, England, Russia, and the United States (Hook). This resulted in the fatality of 17 million military officials and civilians throughout the warfare (Hook). Once the bloodshed concluded, leaders of the world met and planned to create a treaty to end all wars.

    Read More

  • Roosevelt And Churchill's Four Problems: The Yalta Conferences

    347 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Yalta Conference dealt with four problems. The first one was the status of Poland. Roosevelt and Churchill agreed that Poland should be able to choose its own government. The Polish leader who left Warsaw when Germany invaded demanded that pre-war anti-Russia and anti-communist government was seen as the real Polish government. Stain, who had set up his own little government before Yalta had no intention of giving the power back to the Polish leaders who had left Warsaw.

    Read More

  • How Is Hitler Justified In 1939 Dbq

    1431 Words  | 6 Pages

    . had he continued to move toward war”(GK 7). Although Germany was a powerful country at the time, they were only starting to rebuild from the Treaty of Versailles. Germany had many weaknesses in their economy and politics, many other countries were much stronger and more prepared for war than Germany would have been. Appeasing Hitler multiple times, gave Nazi Germany time to grow stronger and prepare for the war they created.

    Read More

  • Who Was To Blame For Ww2 Dbq Essay

    1129 Words  | 5 Pages

    Neville Chamberlain had thought that with this agreement to give the Sudetenland to Germany, Hitler would end because the other countries feared him and wanted to avoid what happened in 1914-1918 (The Munich Conference). This fear, however, drove Hitler even more to continue. This appeasement was a great mistake by the world leaders at the Munich Conference because they showed Hitler that they were afraid of him, allowing him to do more things that went against the Treaty of Versailles without any counteraction. Showing Adolf Hitler the fear of the other European countries and allowing him to take control of the Sudetenland was one of the greatest mistakes that the great leaders could make at the Munich

    Read More

  • Causes Of Appeasement In 1939 Dbq Essay

    504 Words  | 3 Pages

    During 1939 Hitler and his party Nazi was a powerful party that was trying to take over everything. The world was plunged into World War II because of the Treaty of Versailles because Germans didn't like how all the blame was put on them,also the world plunged into World War II because of Hitler's party being very aggressive towards others. The most effective response to aggression would be collective security because, Hitler doesn't care,the failure of appeasement,He gets everything he wants. Hitler wasn't happy with the Treaty of Versailles where Germans troops Were forbidden to enter the Rhineland. Hitler still sent his troops to invade Rhineland and didn't listen.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Fdr And Reichstag Speech

    892 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the “Reichstag Speech” Hitler speaks of his vision for a strong and unified Germany that would be free from the constraints of the Treaty of Versailles and eradicating the Jewish people of Germany (Hitler, 1939) C. After World War I, Germany was forced to pay the reprimands and damages done which in turn made Germany’s

    Read More

  • World War Dbq Essay

    752 Words  | 4 Pages

    The nations thought that if they ignored Hitler, he would become dissuaded to do what he planned for Germany. The nations continued this for quite a while, even going as far as giving Hitler Sudetenland just to avoid a world war that would start in Europe (Doc 4). This made many Europeans ecstatic, but the Czechs were angered. The gullible British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, believed that appeasement was the answer to all their problems (Doc 5) and that if they let Hitler do whatever he pleased, everything would go away. Appeasement did not go as far as Chamberlain thought it would and it still

    Read More

  • World War II DBQ Essay

    889 Words  | 4 Pages

    This is demonstrated when Winston Churchill states that if the Allied powers had worked together to protect Czechoslovakia, then that could have prevented World War II (document 6). Churchill’s statement shows that collective security is the way to respond to aggression and that appeasement only provokes a war. The war lasted six years with many different battles between the Allies and the Axis’s. Hitler did not only invaded Poland, but from there fought his way through many other parts of the world such as Greece, France, Britain, and the Soviet Union. The quote, “It is us today.

    Read More

  • Should US Entered WWI

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    Finally, Germany wasn 't going to give up. They wanted to win this thing. President Wilson said "Victory would mean peace forced upon the loser. " Meaning, if the Allies won the war, then Germany would have to face the consequences, which would end the war (deaths,

    Read More

  • Munich Bombing

    1067 Words  | 5 Pages

    Munich, Germany is where the Nazi Party was formed in 1920. Munich was a major industrial and transport center and that is what made this city a major target for the allied bombers. Munich also created the first concentration camp 10 miles west of the city. Munich was important to the rise of Nazism and the Nazis called Munich the “Capital of Movement.” The Nazi Headquarters were also located in Munich.

    Read More

  • Was Neville Chamberlain's Policy Of Appeasement Justified?

    1045 Words  | 5 Pages

    Neville Chamberlain used many policies when it came to deciding on how to deal with Hitler. One of the main policies he pursued was appeasing Hitler. Chamberlain was a pacifist and didn’t want war so many historians believe that he used appeasement to prevent another world war. Other Historians believe he used appeasement because Britain wasn’t ready to go to war and so he was buying time so the country could prepare for war. Finally, other historians believe that he used appeasement because he wasn’t a good leader in general and that he was a pushover and was just giving in to Hitler’s demands.

    Read More

  • Yalta And Potsdam Speech Analysis

    917 Words  | 4 Pages

    Regarding the Yalta conference,the first agenda was demanding Germany to surrender the war, because the victory of allied power was inevitable and the defeated of Germany was obviously seen. Therefore, the big three met at Yalta to discuss the future and the fate of Germany and they agreed to divide Germany into four parts among the big three with France, once the war end. The second attempt which was discussed at the conferences was the fate of Japan, it was decided and agreed that Stalin should take a control and invaded Japan to end the war, hence, it could take the revenge over

    Read More

  • The Causes Of The Treaty Of Versailles

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    “When the peace treaty is signed, the war isn’t over” (Marlantes). When the fighting stopped on the battlefront of World War I many leaders of different countries gathered together in Paris. They were there to discuss the Treaty of Versailles that would ensure permanent peace. The treaty that was created was extremely unfair to Germany. The Treaty of Versailles was far from perfect, but some of the biggest faults were forcing Germany to take the blame for the whole war, demanding they give up all of their colonies and decrease the size of their military, and paying reparations to the Allies.

    Read More

More about Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's The Munich Agreement

Open Document