Primrose: Sovereignty In The US

We see examples of popular sovereignty all over the world today, from Scotland wanting to become independent from the United Kingdom through peaceful government processes to Ukrainian revolutions within the country. The world today is quickly shaping to be more focused on popular sovereignty because more people want a governing system that mimics one of the United States’ doctrine and ideals. People want a government in which all people are considered equal and have individual worth. They want a government that isn’t tyrannical and a government in which the populace has a say in government affairs. Essentially they want equality and freedom, although that entails having popular sovereignty because these people want to have a voice. But why is popular sovereignty needed in order to have freedom and equality? It’s because the idea of popular sovereignty entails that the government needs the consent of the people before enacting any sort of law or regulation because the people are seen

The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational

The United States government today is still very similar to the way the colonies worked. There are also many differences between our government and their government. Since then, we have broken away from England and we the people get a say in our government and in the way we run things. Throughout the years the basic workings of our governments have stayed the same.

Saltspring island, a lightly populated (25 families) farm driven colony of British Columbia, desired government granted protection because of “unhappy

Individuals lay the foundation of America. The Founding Fathers of this unique nation broke their allegiance with Great Britain to create an improved governing body. They desired an individual-centered authority as opposed to Britain’s monarchy, which ruled with tyranny. These Founding Fathers experienced a neglectful democratic monarchy that cared little about the ethical treatment of its people. The domineering actions of Britain challenged these historic individuals to form a new cultural identity. This new American identity opposes injustice. Justice stands as an important moral and political concept. A prominent component of justice is liberty, which frees society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's lifestyle. Another

To establish which amendment in the Bill of Rights is the most influential to the preservation of liberty, one must first determine the true meaning of the word liberty. The Oxford dictionary defines liberty as “The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behaviour, or political views.” Not only is this one of the core values ingrained into the base of our American culture, but it is also one of the main characteristics of a successful community (“First Amendment.”) Many societies argue that citizens do not have basic rights, the first amendment does the best job at protecting the nation's rights from the government by giving individuals freedom of speech, religion, and freedom of petition. The First Amendment has five freedoms guaranteed for the American people’s such as the right to religion, speech, and petition. This is arguably the most important amendment to liberty, and a person’s right to free will. The first amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or

In federalist paper #4 John Jay, explains the pros of having one strong national government to protect the people from foreign forces and influences; Rather than having 13 or 4 separate states or confederacies. Jay explains in depth how essential it is for America to be one nation with one government in charge of all states (colonies), and be able to commanded and provide safety to all of the states and its people. He states how much more efficiently one government can,” harmonize, assimilate, and protect several parts and members, and extend the benefits of its foresight and precautions to each.” Through maintaining the upper hand over foreign nations in trading, managing finances efficiently, maintain strong militia, free and united powerful

Try to imagine life without the Constitution. Without the Constitution we eventually would end up with some form of tyranny. Within the Constitution there are sections to ensure all powers were equally distributed and that no one group or branch has too much power over the other. That section of the Constitution guards against tyranny. Tyranny is when a person or a group of people have absolute power. The idea of the Constitution came when some believed the Articles of Confederation were weak. The Article of Confederation were weak in ways such as weak central government, no money so they could not tax, boundary disputes, states are fighting and arguing and no respect for small nations and states. While framing a new Constitution James Madison was worried that this Constitution, that was meant to guard against tyranny would possibly lead to some form of tyranny. With the careful writing from our founding fathers the Constitution guards against tyranny by using a system of Checks and Balances and the system of Separation of Powers.

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

In the early years, after winning independence from Great Britain, the American colonies set up their government in accordance with their first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. This means that the majority of the power laid in the hands of the states and Congress, “the only institution of national authority” (Brinkley 151) at that time, had very little power. This distribution of authority was the manifestation of the American’s fear of a strong, central government. However, as time passed, more and more people came to agree that the national government was too weak and needed to be strengthened. For this purpose, a special convention was held in Philadelphia for delegates to “overhaul” the Articles of Confederation and “render the constitution of the Federal government adequate to the exigencies of the union” (161). During what came to be known as the Constitutional Convention, many issues were debated and

Popular sovereignty was first named “squatter sovereignty” by John C. Calhoun and that name was adopted by its rivals. The more familiar meaning of popular sovereignty is that the government is created for the people and by the people. But before the civil war, popular sovereignty was referred to as a political policy that the people who live in a specific area should chose how they are governed. Then in U.S History, it was applied mainly to the idea the settlers of federal lands should decide the relations under which they would join the Union, but mostly applied to the position of free or slave. Congress attempted to make popular sovereignty the “law of the land” with the Compromise of 1850.

The Articles of Confederation was the original United States Constitution. The articles were written and agreed on by delegates of the states, but it still did not do it’s job and many people were frustrated with it. They chose this as their first system of government to keep the states together as a nation, but let the states have their own equal governments. After just ending a war against Britain, the United States knew they could not have a national government that was too strong, as the British had. This led to the Articles of Confederation which gave most of the powers traditionally held by the national government to the states. This spread out the power within the country, with 13 different governments. There were many reasons the colonists felt they should do this, but there was also many difficulties with this. Eventually though, the states decided it was for the best to band together and create a new constitution.

In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, the government is most like a strong central government. In the story, the people are almost “brainwashed’ into thinking what the government wants them to. The government controls what their people know and their knowledge about other countries. And all books are banned, because of the possibility that people will read about how other societies are better and might rebel. The schooling there is completely different, and they learn practically nothing. Also it seems like more crimes and “killings” happen in this book. Clarisse loses more than 6 friends to murders and car accident. Some might say that totalitarian government is needed to have a stable government and that it's practical to have higher up powers make all the important decisions. However, Mixed government is actually the best way to go. It's the best of both worlds, and allows citizens to have freedoms that other countries might not have.

This paper examines whether the poet Anne Bradstreet managed to write autonomously even though she was part of the patriarchic Puritan community. As considering all works of her life would go beyond the limits of this paper, the focus is only on her first publications. Therefore, a short definition of autonomy and gender are given. Secondly, information about the Puritan community as well as Anne Bradstreet is provided. Next, several poems of Anne Bradstreet’s first publications, The Tenth Muse as well as ‚The Author to her book‘ are analyzed in relation to the evidence of autonomy. Finally, the paper concludes by analyzing to what extent Anne Bradstreet accomplished to write autonomously based on the preliminary research.

A country that has this type of government usually has stability since someone is designated as the head of state for a long time until he or she abdicates or dies and therefore it gives a country more stability while other countries that change every few years.