Under integrity it states that members must be straightforward and honest in professional and business and also fair dealing and truthfulness (Langfield Smith, 2015). If Priscilla choose to support Richard and provide false information to the director than Priscilla is failing to comply with integrity with the company and herself. She is failing to be honest with the company and failing to have strong moral principles, which can lead to a negative consequences in the future that can cause her job to be lost and her accountant title to be taken away from her. I strongly suggest that Priscilla provides the company`s director John Lawrence the report analysis Jackie Chen has prepared, the analysis that is prepared will show an clear and accurate result for the company so that the company can make the most accurate decision which will benefit the company. I understand that Priscilla is under pressure to make decision which will benefit her partner and his department but as an accountant she owns to the company to act in the best interest with honesty therefore she should strongly follow the right pathway and provide the company with the accurate report of analysis while complying with the code of
Devlin would have thought the act of polyandry to be immoral and disintegrates the society however, being a moderate moralism he would not have wanted to intervene with the privacy of other unless the act has become very widely practiced and start causing harm to the society. However, if the was a law to be passed to make polyandry legal, Devlin would have disagree with this because once it has been made legal it will drive and encourage many to conduct this immoral act. Devlin did not say that every immoral act is to be prohibited. Devlin used the jury box morality of average right minded citizens where moral standards of behaviour are the standards of behaviour of a reasonable man. Will a reasonable man think the act of polyandry as something good and to be done?
Ethical constraints fear limits our ability to acquire new knowledge when the subject could be offensive or cause harm to living things. The great American philosopher, Joel Feinberg, determined that “his examination of rights should include a careful discussion of the extent to which offense can ever be morally/ethically justified and if there are circumstances in which it should be legally prohibited”. However, some knowledge cannot be acquired without questioning and experiments. Occasionally, those two methods touch sensitive topic or require some sacrifice to be processed. In order to idealize our living society, nobody should feel scared or threatened to express his or her thoughts and ideas.
While granting to its citizens liberty of belief, faith and worship, the Constitution abhorred discrimination on grounds of religion, etc. Not only in fundamentals rights (as has been discussed above) protected by the Right to Constitutional Remedies, but the Principle of Secularism has been incorporated (although implicitly) in the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) and the Fundamental Duties as well. In the DPSP, the Articles of 38, 39, 39A, 41 & 46 not only attempt to promote equal opportunity for growth and sustenance for all, but these principles, coupled with the most basic objective of the state, the doctrine of ‘Parens Patriae,’ promote secularism in all of its forms. Although not justiciable but the onus of maintaining the cordial atmosphere among all the religions and caste, creed and sex is also the responsibility of the citizens as per the Fundamental Duties, especially according to Articles 51A(b), 51A(e) &
Therefore, an individual accepts the rules of authority figures; therefore, a person focuses primarily on external consequences that specific actions may bring. Consequentialist would perceive the action as morally wrong because the offender is punished. The individual 's perception of the act is according to the severity of the punishment for the act. Therefore, the consequentialist sales person desires to obey rules because as an employee of the medical device company the employee signed the contract to maintain the company 's information confidential to avoid being fired. At the next stage of making decision, an individual shows a limited interest in the needs of others to the degree where it might advance the individual 's own interest.
“Convictions generated through plea bargaining are less related to the evidence, and, hence, to actual guilt, than convictions generated by trial” (GilChrist). This serves as an injustice to society because the plea has no restrictions or prerequisites. In order to reform the policy, the article suggest that plea bargains must have some type of evidence of actual guilt before the plea can be given so it will not put those who are innocent in the same category of those who are truly guilty. Allowing the innocent to believe they stand a chance in a trial is important. “Compelling the innocent to lie in order to secure the beneﬁt of a plea bargain further undermines the perceived integrity of the legal system by denying the defendant of a meaningful opportunity to be heard” (GilChrist).
This is because there are no strong based-arguments or reasons to explain his action and under what circumstances can the ‘average Joe’ being made the winner. His only reason is to get better news story and increase publicity for his company. Mr Johnson’s request is unacceptable as it involves rewarding an individual who does not win the competition. For ethical reasons, Paula should have spoken up during the decision process. Moreover, she strongly disagreed with the decision and knew it was ethically wrong for her client to act in such a way it denied the rights of the other participant.
It is important to see the two sides of this argument in order to weigh the consequences. First of all, the idea of spying on people or getting information without consent has never been considered ethical/the right thing to do, even when there has been enough reasons to justify it in other cases. This might compromise the company’s integrity and image with their customers. With this in mind, it is important to mention that even though some net browsers put this into practice, the information they acquire is less personal and the ads are directed in a more general way depending on the demographic. Moreover, people don’t blame those networks because they mostly advertise things that they had looked up online, which some people might find useful.
Code of Conduct of General and Administrative Division The code of conduct of General and Administrative division is to perform honest and ethical conduct that compliance by the law and the standard of company database and record in order to provide detail financial statements. General and Admininstrative division in Mad Cafe shall never manipulate, fraud the firm independent transaction record. Financial division is expected to perform honesty and integrity. Financial division should be fair, transparent, and accurate in transaction report and documents of the company. Transaction record of company shall be protected.
I do not think that a company has the right to monitor emails or phone calls of an employee, no matter their reasoning behind it. That is extremely unethical and wrong in my opinion. The company should at most be able to monitor the websites that are visited at work or obtain a background check. Overall the top level manager will decide what is acceptable and what is not, but the employees should always speak up if they feel their privacy or rights are being violated. The