Gun Enforcement Thesis Statement

Gun control is a very wide reaching and deeply rooted issue to the American people. There are arguments made by both sides, against and for gun control. Some proponents argue everything from the constitution 's wording and date to the very central argument of reducing violence when there are fewer guns. Along with all of these arguable benefits of gun control there are some justifiable disadvantages. Some opposition of gun control would argue that; guns are valuable for self protection, criminal will get guns no matter what, and lower crime rates with more firearms.

This makes us wonder why people can be so defensive over something like a gun that is so dangerous and has lead to a lot of deaths in the American society. Gun control is essential in our society today because it will help prevent unnecessary shootings and crime rate Gun control will play a major part in the decrease of the crime and murder rate. Therefore, in my point of view, guns should be totally controlled and regulated by the government. If gun ownership is controlled by the government, only a limited number of people will be allowed to own guns. In addition, the regulations will make it difficult for people to access guns unless they have a concrete reason as to why they need the weapon.

I also think that handling a gun can tempt someone to do something bad. This further demonstrates that opponents say that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns; that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders; and that gun ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime. On washington post it has many information about handling guns. This shows that some people think handling a gun makes them feel safe. Some people also think that handling a gun can make a kid do something bad with it.

Martin Luther King Jr and Senator Robert F. Kennedy which led to the creation of the Gun Control Act in 1968. Furthermore, there have recently been some mass shooting incidents that have brought about huge debates on the issue of gun control. These debates emphasize the need to strengthen the gun control laws that are currently in place, which are meant to regulate the buying, selling, and owning of gun. Lastly, even though gun control goes against the right given to individuals by the second amendment, having stricter gun control laws is beneficial for the safety of the nation because gun control can significantly decrease the number of deaths that occur because of mass shootings and gun control can also prevent students from shooting up schools. The enforcement of stricter gun control laws would be extremely beneficial for the safety of the people in the United States.

Gunwalking and Gun Control are two different things, because people need laws to be able to walk around daily with guns which is gun control; gun walking is when the USA use operatives to catch people who sell or buy American guns across the border illegally. Morrow4A little bit of background information for gun control would be that gun control has been used since “1966 to 2012 because those were the most mass shootings” (Dilascio); it is still being used today because there

One recommendation to better prevent and be aware of hate crimes is to push the federal government to require all agencies to include hate crimes as a classification in their records and to report these to the FBI. This will allow for better understanding of most at risk areas, and will also encourage agencies to take hate crimes seriously. As the current hate crime statistics are so low, many individuals may no longer think that hate crimes are a problem in the U.S. States. Federal and state lawmakers could also consider harsher sentences for hate crimes, as the current sentence is relatively low, as compared to non-violent drug related crimes for example. Harsher sentencing could send a message to people that the government does not tolerate hate crimes and the punishments for committing one are severe.

In the midst of such hardships like the Sandy Hook and Aroura Shootings and recently the tragedy in Orlando, gun control has become one of the most controversial topics in our society. Many use the fact of the second amendment that American citizens have the right to bear arms to support the debate on both sides. The ones who are in

Gun control is a law in which determines how firearms are used, sold and who have the right to use them. There are statistics that show how most of the population of a country is in favor of owning a firearm for self-defense. In my opinion, gun control should be enforced because it will make us safer and would reduce crimes. If people use guns as self-defense then they would increase the homicide rate.

“A study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that "legal purchase of a handgun appears to be associated with a long-lasting increased risk of violent death"(-https://gun-control.procon.org/). There is such a thing as an unlicensed dealer selling handguns without a background check and proper documentation and it is legal. Those gun buyers are mainly causing chaos with mass shootings and yet others think the Second Amendment defends the right to own a weapon for “self-defense”. It is time for tougher gun control laws; the safety of the citizens depends on a safe environment free of guns from those using them for villainous purposes such as mass shootings or homicides.

Responsible gun owners know how to treat a gun when they buy it, that’s why we have developed an organization to separate these people from irresponsible people who choose to act by a distinct set of the ruling. (Sola, par. 3) This means that some people will have guns, but only the ones who choose to use them for necessary causes. This suggests that people who don’t want their guns to be taken away or banned, will possibly be able to keep them if they show responsibility, and if they don’t, then they will get punished by losing their guns.

Still another program is force harsher punishments for criminals who utilize guns over the span of their

We 've got to stop the madness! The problem isn 't the guns, it 's the criminals

If you recollect about it, this really should be an anticipated effect of gun control, though most people don 't remember far enough past the words "gun" and "control" to see it. When you do give up and recollect about it though, the criminals who are committing crimes at present are the ones still making this a relevant issue of discussion in the foremost position. They are the aces who are either getting access to certain weapons that are already illegal and/or the ones who are using legal weapons illegally. If it weren 't for them disregarding laws and causing these crime rates to fail up, gun control would not still be in

Discussion- This article has given insight into what is going on around the world as this article shows us how gun violence has played a huge role in the world we live in today. The problems that this initiative had was that the ability to be allowed to do consent to search made it hard for officers to abide to others rights. This did solve problems in the beginning as this did reduce gun violence however as this did lower gun violence people felt that this infringed on our first amendment rights. The partnerships that would have made this initiative much more successful would be the help of those in the community as this could put awareness towards the potential crime that is going on.

Back to Honduras, President Maduro called in the country 's’ military to help the police force fight against the gangs. He also changed Article 332, with massive public support, to make it illegal to belong to a street gang. It’s called illicit association, and breaking this law can send boys and young men to jail. In Central America gang tattoos are as influential as having or not having criminal